Twodadsinlondon

1
RubyTuesday39 said:
Must admit, I quite like Rich but since Lew stopped working he’s gotten really full of himself.
Click to expand...
He really has!
Iknow it’s a simple thing, but it was the hot dog chat that got to me 😅 both turning there noses up at hot dogs 🌭 the poor girly must have been exited and then they were saying what they did 🙃
And Lew really needs to admit defeat with his receding hairline!
 
How is it ok to have so much of the detail of these kids’ lives on a public social media account? I know they don’t use their names but given we know where they live, what they look like and their entire educational and medical history let alone the fact they are adopted and one of them has biological siblings, the names seems a bit of a small point tbh.

All to make money and a bit of fame for the parents. It’s so very wrong. I honestly think lots of these kids will rebel and then be very hurt when they are old enough to see how their identities were monetised.
 
smirkingpot said:
How is it ok to have so much of the detail of these kids’ lives on a public social media account? I know they don’t use their names but given we know where they live, what they look like and their entire educational and medical history let alone the fact they are adopted and one of them has biological siblings, the names seems a bit of a small point tbh.

All to make money and a bit of fame for the parents. It’s so very wrong. I honestly think lots of these kids will rebel and then be very hurt when they are old enough to see how their identities were monetised.
Click to expand...
Totally agree. It's all fun and games now with the money, but this could backfire on them when they're old enough to know.
 
I really don’t understand what the big issue is now with regards to their names! I know in their heads they think it protects them but like someone has said previously since they have showed their faces we seem to know enough that doesn’t protect them. We know where they live, they exploit them more than ever for ads, even their surnames which they never said but know we know because of the book. If you are going to have boundaries with social media that’s fine but don’t use it as when u see fit for financial gain
 
I continue to be so shocked how much they feel it is appropriate to share about those kids just to get likes and engagement (and ultimately I suppose ££).
today he has come straight on to give details of a school meeting about the little girl’s EHCP. That’s incredibly personal and private information that she cannot consent be shared. The other parents from the school must be open mouthed.

I find it truly shocking. Lew needs constant validation that he’s popular and the best parent.

And then the other day he was saying how hard it was as they don’t have a circle of support when both their families are close and involved and even go on holiday with them. It was all attention seeking.
 
smirkingpot said:
I continue to be so shocked how much they feel it is appropriate to share about those kids just to get likes and engagement (and ultimately I suppose ££).
today he has come straight on to give details of a school meeting about the little girl’s EHCP. That’s incredibly personal and private information that she cannot consent be shared. The other parents from the school must be open mouthed.


I find it truly shocking. Lew needs constant validation that he’s popular and the best parent.

And then the other day he was saying how hard it was as they don’t have a circle of support when both their families are close and involved and even go on holiday with them. It was all attention seeking.
Click to expand...
I can’t add anything else to this, except he wants to try parenting an SEN child completely alone, and dealing with all the meetings and paperwork solo too. He has a lot of support.
I can’t agree enough that some of this shouldn’t be shared. That little girl needs some privacy.
 
smirkingpot said:
I continue to be so shocked how much they feel it is appropriate to share about those kids just to get likes and engagement (and ultimately I suppose ££).
today he has come straight on to give details of a school meeting about the little girl’s EHCP. That’s incredibly personal and private information that she cannot consent be shared. The other parents from the school must be open mouthed.

I find it truly shocking. Lew needs constant validation that he’s popular and the best parent.

And then the other day he was saying how hard it was as they don’t have a circle of support when both their families are close and involved and even go on holiday with them. It was all attention seeking.
Click to expand...
Totally agree with everything. For two 'supposedly' intelligent adults, they must have forgot once something is on the Internet it's very hard to get rid of it. So one day those kids will be curious teenagers Googling their pictures and names, and all this private information is there to read.
 
hhturbo123 said:
Did anyone see their live last week? My friend did and she said the reason they don’t say the kids names is so a stranger doesn’t walk up to them and make out they know them.
sounds plausible I guess, but maybe just don’t put the kids on social media at all??
Click to expand...
Exactly. When you think back how protective they were by blocking out their faces etc.. How times have changed since money and gifts were introduced.
 
Looks like they’ve been reading up about themselves on here again
 

Attachments

  • IMG_3630.jpeg
    IMG_3630.jpeg
    110.5 KB · Views: 27
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top