Uh… guys?
Yeah. I saw that too. Yikes
Welp there is some absolutely delusional scary obsessive nonsense if you click through all that
Last edited:
Uh… guys?
Yeah. I saw that too. Yikes
Welp there is some absolutely delusional scary obsessive nonsense if you click through all that
What do you mean withdrew the list?Apparently, they withdrew the list and now probably investigate? Not sure (I read it on twitter). But that was expected given they put together list of people who have together combined more stalkers and crazy "Fans" than Backstreet Boys in their prime....
What do you mean withdrew the list?
Surely people will be vetted as they bid etc? But £35K is a LOT of money!!!
Well, they will have to verify the data of the winner of the auction and, well, if she complies with everything she owes, she will have her breakfast with Tom, whether we agree or not.
I think that the man knows how to take care of himself and I also think that he realizes all the rubbish they write on the internet, I really am biased but I don't like the behavior of the fans of the two actors, it is really unfortunate to see people fighting for two people who don't they know about them.
It is a lot of money... rich stalker or savings of a lifetime?What do you mean withdrew the list?
Surely people will be vetted as they bid etc? But £35K is a LOT of money!!!
I don't know, but one thing gets me is that there's people on Twitter saying this woman runs a certain account. How are they so sure? As for the money, does she really have it to spend?It is a lot of money... rich stalker or savings of a lifetime?
If I understand you, it's just that I don't like to fight violence with more violence, at this point you become that stalkerIt’s a LOT of money, like I honestly kind of judge anyone who spends that much money on something like that but I guess it’s going to a good cause regardless? Even just spending $1000 on a lunch with someone who ultimately does not impact my life seems excessive when I could spend it in more productive ways. However, if it’s not hurting anyone then do whatever works for you!
Agreed, if they vett the person and she seems fine then it is out of our hands and won’t make any difference to us. I see what you’re saying about fighting for someone who doesn’t know us, but I’d like to think someone would do the same for me whether I’m famous or not if I’m about to step into a potentially bad situation. But yes at the end of the day whatever happens happens and it’s not up to any of us.
Apparently the fans have already investigated the woman to where she works and are giving the data, I think this overstepped the limits, they say that the woman produces harassment against her actors and these fans do the same with her.I don't know, but one thing gets me is that there's people on Twitter saying this woman runs a certain account. How are they so sure? As for the money, does she really have it to spend?
I don't know, but one thing gets me is that there's people on Twitter saying this woman runs a certain account. How are they so sure? As for the money, does she really have it to spend?
If I understand you, it's just that I don't like to fight violence with more violence, at this point you become that stalker
I know everything will be fine, I want to believe that Tom has everything under control.
There is a lot of money being talked about and if you have it, we can do nothing.
Apparently the fans have already investigated the woman to where she works and are giving the data, I think this overstepped the limits, they say that the woman produces harassment against her actors and these fans do the same with her.
It is a lot of money... rich stalker or savings of a lifetime?
Eddie also has stalkers. https://www.hellomagazine.com/celebrities/2017091442420/eddie-redmayne-stalker-five-years/
I hope they are careful. I recognize the account of the person who won. Lots of nuts out there!
Eddie also has stalkers. https://www.hellomagazine.com/celebrities/2017091442420/eddie-redmayne-stalker-five-years/
I hope they are careful. I recognize the account of the person who won. Lots of nuts out there!
That is why I am always worried, even though I know that Tom and others are aware and have protection and I am sure these events are handled well.
I know Hugh Jackman used to have a stalker who insisted on marrying him and "didn´t matter he had a wife". If I remember correctly, she ended up in some mental institution because she was, indeed, sick.
So I think they have precautions for this type of things. Also, I tend to think that as much as they crazy talk online, they would probably never dare to do something "physically" in a realy life.
However, I always remember the news when Monica Seles was stabbed and it was before social media when people at least didn´t have access to so much information about the person´s life (but maybe it was worse because the had to go to - literally - stalk the person?)
Anyway, I am pretty sure they have this handled when they do events like these.
On a brigther note...this is a great photo and I wonder if the interview is online somehwere? Or if any BAFTA interviews are online already? I haven´t seen much
Even if Tom is safe, having lunch with a person who has run an active hate campaign against your fiancée isn’t something he should have to do.Braydon who is in the pic there replied to me on Instagram on Friday saying that the interview would be up soon.
I'm wondering if he's going to mention TES at all in it.
I remember the Monica Seles thing myself and also John Lenon as that was a stalker too. Obviously these were both extreme cases.
As a generalised rule though most stalkers are wanting to get the attention of said obsession and to them an experience like a dinner would give them access to be in the company of the person. So generally an experience such as this would give them the attention that they crave from the person. Most tend to be relatively harmless when in the company of and getting the attention they crave. Its when they don't get what they want that things go south.
But yeah I'm sure all involved will have measures in place to ensure Tom's and the others safety.
Even if Tom is safe, having lunch with a person who has run an active hate campaign against your fiancée isn’t something he should have to do.
I think there would be checks etc, they don't want someone that's either going to be a danger or an embarrassment!!!I completely agree with you there. Fingers crossed that it's all vetted etc first. Some people online are saying that some previous bids were rejected early in the auction as the bidders were problematic. So hopefully they are running checks etc.
Even if Tom is safe, having lunch with a person who has run an active hate campaign against your fiancée isn’t something he should have to do.