LeonorG
VIP Member
The bowel bro thread is full of screenshots of publicly available data and pictures involving bowel bro and people around him. Tattle seems fine with it. I don't actually understand some of the rules. Someone's comment is removed for allegedly trying to moderate someone else's comment but other people's comments which do the same are left there. Maybe moderators don't keep such a close eye on comments and it's the matter of whether they notice itVery detailed information in previous threads wasn't removed, so, clearly, Tattle did not consider what had been written as a compromise on someone's privacy. Privacy as concerns a public figure is nebulous. The very detailed information that had previously been provided is publicly available information. This site did not consider what was written to be a breach of privacy. Again, privacy as a concept is unclear when dealing with public figures and publicly available information.
In previous threads, readers will find that sharing someone's name, for example, is not a breach of privacy on this site. Sharing liquidation forms that showed that about 25,000 pounds of business loan was unpaid by Tiffany was allowed. Sharing birth dates of Geoff Ferris was allowed. Sharing information found on Facebook profiles was allowed. Sharing screenshots of the medical forms that Tiffany had provided on video was allowed. Sharing photos from Facebook and any type of screenshots from the videos themselves was allowed. The only information that was flagged was when the phone number of the Royal Marsden had been written in a comment. However, one can easily go to Google and find that information in less than a minute. I believe that sharing phone numbers is where the line is drawn on this site. It is informative to have this type of summary so that people know what type of information has already been shared. The good old method of trial and error also can be attempted.