Those Happy Days #4 Abandoning vehicles is our game, but obviously it’s others we’ll blame.!

1
It's just insane that they've apparently paid and ordered one of these things without having tested it - and immediately on testing it in the UK have found it's too small, they can't sleep in it, they're cold etc etc.
---
They barely have more space than they did in that Berlingo.
 
It's just insane that they've apparently paid and ordered one of these things without having tested it - and immediately on testing it in the UK have found it's too small, they can't sleep in it, they're cold etc etc.
---
They barely have more space than they did in that Berlingo.
Good for a short trip, nothing more. I don't understand why they're so insistent on 'living' in these impractical vehicles. If they really were full time vanlifers they'd have the likes of a Sprinter or a Transit.
 
Torturing myself watching the vid... can they fit in it? they didn't think to check. The fridge is in the way of wurzel's legs... oh god.... why would anyone let them endorse their products or lend them a van? what is their combined I.Q? Who needs a fridge anyway? What a stupid invention. I might just throw mine out of my kitchen to give me more room.

8.04 mins in anti cancer mushroom drops... I reported it to youtube, don't think they will do anything, but I reported it.

The light really has gone out in Nana's eyes... this is her life now... just an endless stream of silly vans... being cold... sh*tting at tescos.....

'we just need to get our life in order' - famous last words there, Nana

out goes the pillows now.... bye bye fridge... strip it all out.... who would have thought that a plastic tub on the back on a truck was small to live in....

just put the food on the roof, Wurzel, that'll keep it cool. Fridges are so overated.

it's back Fridge 2: revenge of the food cooler. This time it's personal. Bad luck Wurzel.

More bad luck. Wurzel stepped in dog shite, then gets into the truck, stinking it up. A plastic tub on wheels smelling of dog shite.

They need some diesel - won't it run off the fumes of the dog shite he stood in?

what does this panel do? what do these lights mean? who knows. Huh? What?

6ft 2 Wurzel can't fit in a 6ft space!

join them next week for more complete and utter incompetence.

Just look at Rudolph, he can't wait until they join him at Lapland
auroras-raindeers-lapland-sure-voyager-travel-971126349.jpg
 
Very doubtful that's even a defense as he was babbling on about lions mane at that point. Then clearly switches over to babbling on about the other type - both by mentioning and visually, so in my view he's up to his scrawny neck in a clear breach.

Let the ASA do their thing.
 
Problem is Worzel old chum - you're too bleeping tight to have used up the £5 you put in in Asda Gloucester just before you leave, so your diesel will have frozen somewhere slightly north of Billund. Yes, dear Tattlers, I know thats in Denmark, but Worzel ain't known for his geographical nous. Also, whats the betting he won't get his bobblehead around the filling system on that gas tank - oh, and there's the slight issue of finding somewhere that will legally allow you to fill it - I think there's 1 in South Wales that I know of for example and you have to have an account already setup with them, so its not just a rock up and fill situation.
 
I had a reply back from ASA:
~~~~



Thank you for contacting the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) recently about Liam & Janine Day, and for your patience while we considered your complaint.

You may be interested to know we received similar complaints about this advertiser.

The ASA received nine complaints.
  1. Most complainants challenged whether the posts were undisclosed marketing communications.
  2. Four complainants objected this advertiser was promoting CBD products on social media using medicinal claims, including “anti-cancer” claims.
Thank you for bringing this issue to our attention. We acknowledge the concerns you have raised about this advertiser, and I have forwarded the details of your complaint to the CAP Compliance team for them include in their enforcement action.

Unlike with cases which require further investigation by the ASA, where additional commentary or input from a complainant can be necessary to fully understand the issues, your complaint touches on an issue which we know is a clear problem under the rules. In those circumstances, the Compliance team has all the information it needs and will work directly with the advertisers to bring about compliance.

The Compliance Team doesn’t report to complainants or routinely publish the details of its work but please be assured they will take the most appropriate course of action. If the advertiser does not comply, the Compliance team can apply sanctions, and may ultimately refer the matter to our legal backstop, Trading Standards.

In regard to the cancer treatments claims more specifically, I would advise that these are not covered by the advertising rules the ASA enforce. Cancer treatment claims are specifically prohibited by legislation under the Cancer Act 1939. As a non-statutory body, the ASA cannot interpret or apply legislation directly and so this issue is best tackled by Trading Standards.

We would therefore recommend that you contact the Citizens Advice consumer service, who offer free, confidential and impartial advice on consumer issues, and can make referrals to Trading Standards in regards to issues relating to legislation, such as breaches of the Cancer Act. You can contact their helpline on 03454 040506 (Monday to Friday from 9am to 5pm) or you can find further information here: https://www.citizensadvice.org.uk/c...if-you-need-more-help-about-a-consumer-issue/.

In terms of Issue 1, thank you for making us aware of these posts. Advertising should contain nothing that is likely to mislead. We base our decisions on the content of the ad, when and where it appears, the audience and the type of product or service. When assessing complaints in this area, difficult subjective judgements are often required and we aim to strike a balance between allowing an advertiser a platform for their product while ensuring the high standards of the advertising rules are met.

After careful internal assessment, the posts did not score highly enough to warrant immediate action. Please be assured your complaint has been considered fully, in line with our Non-Broadcast Complaint Handling procedures. However, if you would like to submit a further complaint about undisclosed marketing communications from this advertiser, please visit Make a complaint - ASA | CAP.

While we won’t take further action this time in regard to Issue 1, we shall keep a record of your complaint for reference in our future assessments. We shall also take your complaint into account in our regular, proactive ‘intelligence gathering’ sweeps, where we analyse a range of information – including complaints made to us – to spot significant or emerging issues.

I hope this helps to explain our decisions, and thank you again for contacting us with your concerns.


~~~
I think therefore that means they're not doing anything with it? But they know the anti-cancer thing is bad and suggest I do more with it by reporting to trading standards? Or am I misreading that?
 
I've had the same email - word for word.

I read it as they'll give them a shakedown and keep half an eye on them going forward. Its quite shocking that they seemingly 'couldn't care less' about blatant law breaking and want members of the public to take it up with trading standards, despite trading standards, in their words, being 'our legal backstop'.

ASA do your bloody jobs - as it sounds like your just some toothless quango that just take a wage for issuing the odd 'slap on the wrist' - I am very disappointed.
 
Oh oopsie for them on their vegan page, trying Gregg's vegan festive bake and Janine got given the meat one. Apparently she didn't realise and the initial review was about how "meaty" it was. Only people commenting saying that was not the vegan one made them realise. Odd I'm veggie and can usually tell pretty quickly if I've accidently been given a meat item (happened with spring rolls and a pasty but not often).
Interestingly some comments on the post saying the page has got lazy recently about not being clear or being a bit misleading. Seems similar complaints cropping up there about them as on their van page... This is their job they really need to sharpen up and pay attention of they want to continue the grift, I think people expect higher standards from people who shill their lives on SM now and being sloppy/inconsistent/untruthful will not do you any favours.
 
Oh oopsie for them on their vegan page, trying Gregg's vegan festive bake and Janine got given the meat one. Apparently she didn't realise and the initial review was about how "meaty" it was. Only people commenting saying that was not the vegan one made them realise. Odd I'm veggie and can usually tell pretty quickly if I've accidently been given a meat item (happened with spring rolls and a pasty but not often).
Interestingly some comments on the post saying the page has got lazy recently about not being clear or being a bit misleading. Seems similar complaints cropping up there about them as on their van page... This is their job they really need to sharpen up and pay attention of they want to continue the grift, I think people expect higher standards from people who shill their lives on SM now and being sloppy/inconsistent/untruthful will not do you any favours.
No excuse now considering Greggs even print the bake patterns on the bloody paper bags they dish the grub out in. See - I said they were closet vegans for 'work'
 
Oh oopsie for them on their vegan page, trying Gregg's vegan festive bake and Janine got given the meat one. Apparently she didn't realise and the initial review was about how "meaty" it was. Only people commenting saying that was not the vegan one made them realise. Odd I'm veggie and can usually tell pretty quickly if I've accidently been given a meat item (happened with spring rolls and a pasty but not often).
Interestingly some comments on the post saying the page has got lazy recently about not being clear or being a bit misleading. Seems similar complaints cropping up there about them as on their van page... This is their job they really need to sharpen up and pay attention of they want to continue the grift, I think people expect higher standards from people who shill their lives on SM now and being sloppy/inconsistent/untruthful will not do you any favours.
Wow I can’t believe she didn’t notice either, so dopey!
 
This is what makes me strongly suspect they're not vegan at all. When you really don't eat meat it's obvious when you are eating an animal product.
And it's often the smell before you even eat it that is the giveaway. Especially if it's hot.
I know being a veggie/vegan doesn't automatically mean you are healthy eaters - but bloody hell they eat a lot of crap. So much processed tit. No wonder they both look so awful and puffy.
 
Back
Top