BurlieWhurlie
Active member
I think she’s deleted that Merc post on her grid. Can’t see it anywhere.
Oh and her follower count has dropped.......
Oh and her follower count has dropped.......
There is absolutely NO need for her to have the Mercedes.With Motorbility it is paid for via the higher rate Mobility payment from your DLA/PIP to be honest I cannot see how he was awarded higher rate as he is still so young and is learning to stand and hopefully walk. If you want a more luxurious model of car it requires a down payment which is non refundable and has to be renewed in 3 years time.She rushed to get the GLA model as it was either being removed from the scheme or it had almost sold out.The down payment will have been around £4,500 plus she got the sunroof for J so another few grand. So who knows what she paid, seriously how can she use her son to justify her grandiose spending?Does anyone know why they need a merc car if J sits in a car seat in the front? In what way is it adapted for his needs? Sorry I only wondered this when I saw the title of the thread
I think she’s deleted that Merc post on her grid. Can’t see it anywhere.
Oh and her follower count has dropped.......
I doubt she will mention Tattle as she is probably shitting herself thinking her followers may read the truth about her! Or she will do a full on breakdown and say the Tattle trolls have destroyed her mental health and she has lost carers,missed meds as she is SO tired in the hope that someone sets up another Gofundme to pay for a well deserved holiday,clothes shop,deposit for a huge house (her council house is now clearly beneath her lifestyle)Snap Just checked and wrote the same
Where is that post from??OMG! Do we reckon this is referring to Baby girl Kayteee? The words are practically the same as my post earlier on here ( Promise it was not me on IG) Imagine if Eucerin demanded their money back due to a conflict of interests in her ads She was a complete twit posting the three products one after the other ( Benefit,Beauty Pie and Eucerin)
And then plugs the magazine app she gets paid to advertise. You couldn't make it up with her. So she don't really give a tit on what you think about the article. Just swipe up to read it. Joker.I can’t quite believe what I’m seeing, her discussing how the portrayal of disabilities is shown online/ the media.
head needs another wobble there lass, YOU are the worst for it!!!!
Ps I joined tattle so I could contribute to this thread and here I am with a thread title, what a day
pps I too have screenshots of the merc post
And then plugs the magazine app she gets paid to advertise. You couldn't make it up with her. So she don't really give a tit on what you think about the article. Just swipe up to read it. Joker.
Wow! Just wow! Surely she should of used the hashtags in the first post stating #ad #afflink #paidpartnership? So f’ing manipulative and a fraud.She posted this article yesterday that I wanted to read but obviously she placed text over the top of the corner,mystic Meg here predicts that Glamour magazine was part of the ad campaign she did for online magazines That would seriously be taking the piss out of a very sensitive topic of conversation just to boost her engagement.Surely she will not stoop that low?
Where is that post from??
Where is that post from??
[/QUOTE
It’s on Eucerin Uk’s IG page
OMG! Do we reckon this is referring to Baby girl Kayteee? The words are practically the same as my post earlier on here ( Promise it was not me on IG) Imagine if Eucerin demanded their money back due to a conflict of interests in her ads She was a complete twit posting the three products one after the other ( Benefit,Beauty Pie and Eucerin)
Maybe her management company are speaking to her legal team at the momentIf she’s reading this, she’ll not do what everyone expects her to do. She’ll either bring it up for the sympathy or just pretend it doesn’t exist and carry on but (hopefully) be more aware of her actions