Renegadedancer
VIP Member
I read that too...same with George and Amal Clooney. Social climbing at its finest. She’s soShe hadn’t met Oprah before the wedding by all accounts
‘obvious’ with what she does. She will probably write a book next .
I read that too...same with George and Amal Clooney. Social climbing at its finest. She’s soShe hadn’t met Oprah before the wedding by all accounts
Now if they had held on for a bit and done some more work with their patronages, gone on tour to America, Meghan wore stylish clothes that put her on the top dressed lists, etc and then left the Royal Family they would have a better shot at getting work in America because the people would know them. But right now, because they worked for so little time whilst married, they haven’t been able to make their mark and stand out.I wonder how interested the American audience will be , she was never a big star there was she.
These two are going to be whining and complaining at the same time that Prince Philip has been transferred to a heart hospital and may not even be alive by then
Wow, could they get any lower?
Do we know that Harry hasn't been in touch with his grandparents? I haven't read anything around that (hark at me making it sound like I read anything, I totally rely on tattle to give me the news )
Is everyone watching the interview? I'm not. I wonder if people who say how much they hate Harry and Meghan and their thirst for publicity will actually tune in
I am! People might say ‘eurgh, you have no life’ and they’d be 100% correctIs everyone watching the interview? I'm not. I wonder if people who say how much they hate Harry and Meghan and their thirst for publicity will actually tune in
If they interest you fair enough. My point was those that dislike them and still watch it. I don't understand that personallyI am! People might say ‘eurgh, you have no life’ and they’d be 100% correct
I think Meghan’s choice of make up, hair and clothing is interesting for the Oprah interview. She usually has it down, but if it’s up it’s messy. When doing confessional type interviews you usually wear light colours (she’s wearing black, which might be nothing because she likes to dress in black) and clean ‘natural’ make up but she’s gone for a very heavy eye which looks a bit out of place. Harry looks ‘fresh’ in his light grey suit, no tie and open buttons but Meghan looks like she’s ready for a fight with her sleek updo and heavy eyelook. Those two look the opposite of each other, like night and day. It’s not very cohesive from an aesthetic point of view.
On one hand, I agree. If you're so bothered by some people, people you don't even know, people who aren't living off of your taxes anymore, why get all this rage? Sometimes I'm annoyed by the expression, but in this case it fits perfectly: Living rent free in some people's heads.If they interest you fair enough. My point was those that dislike them and still watch it. I don't understand that personally
There are ways of watching without adding viewing figuresI won’t watch but I will tattle about it. Don’t want to add to the viewing figures!
I can see your point. But there’s a theme with the type of programmes he’s going on and who’s interviewing. James Corden, Oprah, will it be Ellen next and the whole audience get a copy of Megs first book ‘ Living with the Royals - My Story’ . It’s all very reality show. I don’t know the answer but I really don’t think people are as interested in them as they like to think.On one hand, I agree. If you're so bothered by some people, people you don't even know, people who aren't living off of your taxes anymore, why get all this rage? Sometimes I'm annoyed by the expression, but in this case it fits perfectly: Living rent free in some people's heads.
Also, if you want interest to die, then you can't click on the articles, blog posts etc.
On the other hand, I think that if you're going to comment, you better watch and then be fair. As example just the most recent interview with James C, going by the way the headlines were written and the quotes etc it looked like a massive train wreck. Rapping with James, like, really?? But then watching it was a whole other thing and the "rap" was more of a recital of a couple of lines of a lyric goaded by James.
On the suggestion of putting out a statement by Harry of well wishes for Phil: Just no. That would go over like a lead balloon with the family, Phil and the public. You just don't do that. And whatever happens to Phil, it's only Phil's office/the family who puts out a statement and no one else.
There are ways of watching without adding viewing figures
Tbh I don't want to add to the figures, either, no way. But there are links, so you can watch a million times and it's not going to be logged.
I can see your point. But there’s a theme with the type of programmes he’s going on and who’s interviewing. James Corden, Oprah, will it be Ellen next and the whole audience get a copy of Megs first book ‘ Living with the Royals - My Story’ . It’s all very reality show. I don’t know the answer but I really don’t think people are as interested in them as they like to think.
You get a book, you get a book, everybody gets a book.
I'm not quite sure why anyone thinks Meghan owes it to the royals to give up her life for them. I'm not that keen on her but I can see why they left, life as a second string royal must be boring and they got a lot of hassle. I think a lot of the ultra royalists problems are that if senior members can up and leave then they can't be that special, the royal family hinges on the idea they're some how special and different from the rest of us. As soon as they're not, what is the point?