The Radford Family #57 Only famous for how much they breed, will the next Radford baby be named “Sweed”

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
1
HoppingAlong said:
Exactly what I said! How many thousands in Disney? Could have donated that instead 😡
---

I think you’re right! I think the only cars there were their own!
---

Not enough! Archie was 100% sat on the floor between seats 😡
Thick. Selfish. Uncaring.
---

Hit a nerve Sue? It’s only what lots are thinking even if they don’t dare say it!
---
Katie caught up with her friend Sophie…. That conversation was not between friends!! It was stilted and uncomfortable.
Does Sue have any emotion? When Noel told her about Sophie , her expression never changed. And thinking about it, you never see her hugging or cuddling the children. I’m always being affectionate with mine!

So many things wrong with this programme:
Cashing in on Sophie’s cancer story
Archie on the floor of the minivan
The dogs cramped into those cages
‘Selling’ stuff to raise funds when all of it just gets replaced at Christmas… they could have donated that money instead

I really despise this family right now.
Click to expand...
That is such a good point. I have never ever seen Sue or Noel just sitting down with the kids, cuddling and reading a story. She holds them when they are babies then that's their lot. The rest of the time they play on the floor with her sitting chilling with another coffee. She is emotionally stunted as well as educationally stunted.
 
AllieBee said:
That is such a good point. I have never ever seen Sue or Noel just sitting down with the kids, cuddling and reading a story. She holds them when they are babies then that's their lot. The rest of the time they play on the floor with her sitting chilling with another coffee. She is emotionally stunted as well as educationally stunted.
Click to expand...
That’s the beauty of having so many. You don’t “need” to entertain them even as they play amongst themselves. It’s what makes them great parents. Produce and walk away. Just be there to break up the fights. I mean, the one left behind with the abused dogs was amazed a microwave meal had instructions on the back. He said he’d love to cook with his dad and gain that “skill”. My kids have helped cook and prepare meals from when they were old enough to have a knife. What did they do with this kid? Chicken ding and he thought it was revolutionary! Beggars belief.
 
lissy8219 said:
Did anyone else notice Archie sat in between 2 carseats but without a carseat himself and I'm not sure if he had his seat belt on either. Another clip a girl Phoebe/Hallie not sure again no carseat /belt on.
Click to expand...
Yep, I mentioned it in my post above. Life is obviously cheap to the Radfords.
---
wowee22 said:
Tillie is 13. I think this needs reminding to the radford duo. Would they be happy her being pregnant. Plus, Sue might’ve been pregnant at 13. And she fell pregnant the first time?
Click to expand...

Someone did say something on their page about that and Sue laughed it off saying it happens and she wasn’t the only one….
 
wellwellwellitsanotherad said:
Absolutely ...complain about channel 5 glamourising peadophilia and statutory rape and child.pregnancy. They are basically televising that if you have sex with and get a girl pregnant when she is 13 and you are an adult ( or at all) and then keep doing it that you can make millions out of it. They should.not be trying to normalise it
Or putting him on a pedestal.

Similarly loose women on ITV did the same the other day. But that would be a separate report

I wonder why Sally Lindsay hasn't stepped back. She must hate knowing the truth of what he did and having to narrate all the bullshit.
Click to expand...
She's getting well paid to narrate and if she had anything about her she would step back...lord knows she's not short of work....
 
wowee22 said:
Tillie is 13. I think this needs reminding to the radford duo. Would they be happy her being pregnant. Plus, Sue might’ve been pregnant at 13. And she fell pregnant the first time?
Click to expand...
what's scary is that Sue has responded to a question directly asking about this before. her reply was that although she wouldn't be happy if Tillie - at age 13 - were to be impregnated by a17/18 year old guy, she wouldn't be "happy" about it, but she would accept it because "hey, it happens!" basically revealing that if her own daughter were a victim of grooming/sexual assualt/statutory rape, it wouldn't faze her. she wouldn't step in to protect Tillie from the predatory older guy, and would instead roll her eyes at yet ANOTHER 13 year old pregnant with a much older guy - which apparently was very normal when she was at school. due to her own experiences with Noel, I don't think she would even see Tillie as a victim - just the usual "it takes two to make a baby" spiel, as though her child is equally as responsible. 😔😡
 
AliceInWanderLost said:
what's scary is that Sue has responded to a question directly asking about this before. her reply was that although she wouldn't be happy if Tillie - at age 13 - were to be impregnated by a17/18 year old guy, she wouldn't be "happy" about it, but she would accept it because "hey, it happens!" basically revealing that if her own daughter were a victim of grooming/sexual assualt/statutory rape, it wouldn't faze her. she wouldn't step in to protect Tillie from the predatory older guy, and would instead roll her eyes at yet ANOTHER 13 year old pregnant with a much older guy - which apparently was very normal when she was at school. due to her own experiences with Noel, I don't think she would even see Tillie as a victim - just the usual "it takes two to make a baby" spiel, as though her child is equally as responsible. 😔😡
Click to expand...
The amount of posters on Ok's Facebook page when they posted the article about how young Scratty was when she first fell pregnant of people saying "it takes 2" made me feel sick. She was 13!! 13!! 😞🤢
 
Sue, if you’re reading here which is seems like you probably are, here’s your to do list for the week, you thick, selfish individual:

- Walk your dogs. All of them (that includes Lola)
- Look at an in car safety video - you’re familiar with YouTube so have a look and note that your children should be wearing seatbelts. All of them.
- Cuddle your kids
- Make sure your kids brush their teeth for more than a second
- For god sake clean your house you bunch of filthy gits

I think that’s probably all your stunted 13 year old brain can deal with for now. We look forward to seeing you document it on one of your socials.
 
Sunday nights episode really irritated me for so many reasons. How can their following not see the hypocrisy of it all? They'll do episode after episode flaunting how much money they have, lavish holidays, cars, new houses, expensive toys for the children etc, yet their "best friends" are in desperate need of financial help for their sick daughter and the Radfords expect their followers to pay? The cost of 1 of their trips to Florida could probably pay for a fair chunk of Sophie's treatment.

Sue's comment about how they have so many children so the risk of something serious happening to one of them is higher absolutely sickened me. Why make it about yourself.
 
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Back
Top