Runforestrun
VIP Member
I remember years ago on one of the tv programmes they were talking about when Noel got his vasectomy reversed and it was because he wanted more, not so much Sue. She said then that he was the one pushing for them all.
I remember years ago on one of the tv programmes they were talking about when Noel got his vasectomy reversed and it was because he wanted more, not so much Sue. She said then that he was the one pushing for them all.
I reckon he's a proper angry piece of tit. Wasn't there a fist fight or something with the oldest kid that ended with a TV getting broken? It was mentioned here but some time ago.On the point of coercive control does anyone else think that Noel looks like a nasty angry person? He always has red eyes and nose too a bit like a alcoholic
yeah, giving an unmarried mother registering a child with her maiden name isn't surprising - but in Sue's case, it wouldn't surprise me if it was also done as a way of protecting Noel - if Chris had been given the Radford surname as a baby, there would have been official documentaion which inadvertently accused Noel of rape, i don't know if he was listed as Chris' father or not, but even if he was, the baby having a different surname helps distance him from the situation so was probably done intentionally.Lots of unmarried women register with their last name so it’s not massively surprising. Even more so because she was young and people probably assumed the relationship wouldn’t last.
I remember hearing their "official " story & it was explained that she was on the pill for the years between Chris & the page 3 model. So clearly everyone knew (planned on ) him raping her whenever until they could get married.I don’t think they’res anything to suggest they’re against contraception is there? In early interviews, I remember them both saying they always wanted a big family. I think it’s disgusting what he did getting her pregnant so young, but there’s nothing to say it was him forcing her to have all the babies! It could equally have been her wanting them and then realising the money and attention they got from it!
yeah, giving an unmarried mother registering a child with her maiden name isn't surprising - but in Sue's case, it wouldn't surprise me if it was also done as a way of protecting Noel - if Chris had been given the Radford surname as a baby, there would have been official documentaion which inadvertently accused Noel of rape, i don't know if he was listed as Chris' father or not, but even if he was, the baby having a different surname helps distance him from the situation so was probably done intentionally.
If Noel isn't on Chris's birth certificate and they didn't name him as the father when asked by any medics or authorities at the time, there would still be DNA evidence that could be used to prove it.Some poster here recieved a solicitor letter saying to stop calling Noel as there is no evidence he's actually Chris's biological father (well apart from the TV programme). It was then stated that Chris was registered with Sue's maiden name.
If Noel isn't on Chris's birth certificate and they didn't name him as the father when asked by any medics or authorities at the time, there would still be DNA evidence that could be used to prove it.
I remember her mum saying this potentially on the show, that she was told not to report anything or they'd run away instead of protecting her young child she let it continue with an adult.
Loads of people could have stepped in but didn't
The doctor
School staff
Midwives
And yet it disgusts and sickens sue if someone questions if it were tillie.
This has just reminded me of that time on the show where they met up with the SON of the surgeon who carried out Noel's vasectomy (or was it his reversal?). That was so weird and I can't understand why the son ever agreed to sit and talk to themI remember years ago on one of the tv programmes they were talking about when Noel got his vasectomy reversed and it was because he wanted more, not so much Sue. She said then that he was the one pushing for them all.
£££This has just reminded me of that time on the show where they met up with the SON of the surgeon who carried out Noel's vasectomy (or was it his reversal?). That was so weird and I can't understand why the son ever agreed to sit and talk to them
If Noel isn't on Chris's birth certificate and they didn't name him as the father when asked by any medics or authorities at the time, there would still be DNA evidence that could be used to prove it.
Yes absolutely this. There are a few glimpses of this over the years, him loosing his temper! EtcOn the point of coercive control does anyone else think that Noel looks like a nasty angry person? He always has red eyes and nose too a bit like a alcoholic
He also has his temper,if stories are to be believed (I am thinking of the right one right? They all look the same.. ratty and I can't keep up)The eldest son looks the spit of Noel, so defo think it’s his child!
He also has his temper,if stories are to be believed (I am thinking of the right one right? They all look the same.. ratty and I can't keep up)