The Radford Family #56 Ding Dong Merrily no pies, The Radford's house is minging!

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
1
mammaof3 said:
Seems they may have just been achieved to stop any deletion lol. 🙃

archive.today

Sue Radford was pregnant age 13 as Noel under fire from 22 Kids viewe…

archived 18 Jan 2024 20:51:19 UTC
archive.today archive.today
archive.today

The Radford Family: Every scandal they have been involved in

archived 18 Jan 2024 20:56:35 UTC
archive.today archive.today
Click to expand...
the amount of fans in the comments arguing and fiercely adamant that Sue was 18 when her first child was born - even mentioning "the maths", as Sue is 48 and her eldest is 30 🤯 - part of the issue seems to be that Chris not appearing in the show means that they have successfully fooled much of their audience into thinking Sophie is the eldest of their brood, and given the backlash in some of the comments with valid accusations of statutory rape, it wouldn't surprise me of they are having regrets about publishing their book, as that seems to have opened people's eyes to the fact she was a child when Noel impregnated her. hardly surprising it was a detail very much glossed over by Channel 5. also very telling that so many of their so-called fans are adamant that both Sue and Noel grew up in care, entirely unaware that they were both adopted as babies and raised by their adoptive parents

that said, there are still loads of the usual defensive responses - happily married, they stayed together, hard-working family, things were different back in the 80s and nobody would have seen statutory rape as a crime "back then" etc - with the worst being that it wasn't rape because they both consented - as though a 13 is able to give consent 🙄 - plus the usual spiel about teen pregnancies not being uncommon, blah blah blah, as though they were both young teens and not a 17year old abusing a child he had first met when she was 7 years old. 🤢

not to mention a comment I saw that said Sue was likely a typical teen who had lied to him her older boyfriend about her age, and looked far older than she was - anyone who has seen the photo of Sue holding baby Chris, it is blatantly obvious that she is a young girl. even if Noel hadn't been aware of her age - which he was, having known her since she was a young child - it would be veyy obvious from her appearance that she was far younger than 16, and that he was sexually attracted to a CHILD.
 
AliceInWanderLost said:
the amount of fans in the comments arguing and fiercely adamant that Sue was 18 when her first child was born - even mentioning "the maths", as Sue is 48 and her eldest is 30 🤯 - part of the issue seems to be that Chris not appearing in the show means that they have successfully fooled much of their audience into thinking Sophie is the eldest of their brood, and given the backlash in some of the comments with valid accusations of statutory rape, it wouldn't surprise me of they are having regrets about publishing their book, as that seems to have opened people's eyes to the fact she was a child when Noel impregnated her. hardly surprising it was a detail very much glossed over by Channel 5. also very telling that so many of their so-called fans are adamant that both Sue and Noel grew up in care, entirely unaware that they were both adopted as babies and raised by their adoptive parents

that said, there are still loads of the usual defensive responses - happily married, they stayed together, hard-working family, things were different back in the 80s and nobody would have seen statutory rape as a crime "back then" etc - with the worst being that it wasn't rape because they both consented - as though a 13 is able to give consent 🙄 - plus the usual spiel about teen pregnancies not being uncommon, blah blah blah, as though they were both young teens and not a 17year old abusing a child he had first met when she was 7 years old. 🤢

not to mention a comment I saw that said Sue was likely a typical teen who had lied to him her older boyfriend about her age, and looked far older than she was - anyone who has seen the photo of Sue holding baby Chris, it is blatantly obvious that she is a young girl. even if Noel hadn't been aware of her age - which he was, having known her since she was a young child - it would be veyy obvious from her appearance that she was far younger than 16, and that he was sexually attracted to a CHILD.
Click to expand...
Worst one was a thicko claiming Nowall was an immature 18 year old so doesn't count 🤦‍♀️🤦‍♀️🤦‍♀️
 
Has anyone watched the New Year’s Eve vlog? Sue is talking to Hallie and Phoebe and in the background Heidie is screaming, in a voice Satan himself would be proud of, “Mummmmmy, MUMMMMMY, I WANT ONE OF THEM, MUMMMMMMY, MUMMMYYYYYYYYYY…”. Little brat, why the hell Sue doesn’t say to her “don’t talk to me like that” or “you’ll only get something if you’re being good” etc etc etc. God almighty woman, give Veruca Salt some discipline and stop giving her stuff until she can behave.
 
AliceInWanderLost said:
the amount of fans in the comments arguing and fiercely adamant that Sue was 18 when her first child was born - even mentioning "the maths", as Sue is 48 and her eldest is 30 🤯 - part of the issue seems to be that Chris not appearing in the show means that they have successfully fooled much of their audience into thinking Sophie is the eldest of their brood, and given the backlash in some of the comments with valid accusations of statutory rape, it wouldn't surprise me of they are having regrets about publishing their book, as that seems to have opened people's eyes to the fact she was a child when Noel impregnated her. hardly surprising it was a detail very much glossed over by Channel 5. also very telling that so many of their so-called fans are adamant that both Sue and Noel grew up in care, entirely unaware that they were both adopted as babies and raised by their adoptive parents

that said, there are still loads of the usual defensive responses - happily married, they stayed together, hard-working family, things were different back in the 80s and nobody would have seen statutory rape as a crime "back then" etc - with the worst being that it wasn't rape because they both consented - as though a 13 is able to give consent 🙄 - plus the usual spiel about teen pregnancies not being uncommon, blah blah blah, as though they were both young teens and not a 17year old abusing a child he had first met when she was 7 years old. 🤢

not to mention a comment I saw that said Sue was likely a typical teen who had lied to him her older boyfriend about her age, and looked far older than she was - anyone who has seen the photo of Sue holding baby Chris, it is blatantly obvious that she is a young girl. even if Noel hadn't been aware of her age - which he was, having known her since she was a young child - it would be veyy obvious from her appearance that she was far younger than 16, and that he was sexually attracted to a CHILD.
Click to expand...
Chris is actually nearer to his mother in age than he is to most of his siblings 🤯
Absolutely mental that.
 
Prince fan 1999 said:
Worst one was a thicko claiming Nowall was an immature 18 year old so doesn't count 🤦‍♀️🤦‍♀️🤦‍♀️
Click to expand...
same with the "he was 17! he was a CHILD, not a man!" for a start, he was only a few months away from turning 18, but by that logic, Sue was an infant, having barely started secondary school! they all seem to be okay with it on the basis that they were both teenagers, and teen pregnancies happen - as though a 17 year old raping a 13 year old girl, and potentially abusing her from a much younger age, is in any way the same situation as two 15 year olds and an accidental pregnancy. also hilarious that their fans argue Noel wasn't an adult at age 17/18, yet "things were different back then", as kids left school at 15 and were working, so far more grown up and mature than kids of a similar age nowadays - yet conveniently that seems to have applied only to girls, as 17 year old males were still "boys".

whether or not he was technically an "adult" by definition is irrelevant - he was over the age of 16 and Sue wasn't, by default that is statutory rape, just as it was in the late 80s. the constant attempts to create excuses to defend and protect Noel as opposed to his child victim are mindblowing - even more so those actually BLAMING Sue for the abuse, because "it takes two to make a baby". WTF?! 🤯
 
This is the thing with the book it will have to describe Sue and Noel meeting, starting a relationship and conceiving their first child, when Sue was just thirteen and Noel seventeen/eighteen.
How is the book going to do this with its sickly sweet most wonderful family ever theme when describing child sex abuse.
 
sebanna said:
This is the thing with the book it will have to describe Sue and Noel meeting, starting a relationship and conceiving their first child, when Sue was just thirteen and Noel seventeen/eighteen.
How is the book going to do this with its sickly sweet most wonderful family ever theme when describing child sex abuse.
Click to expand...
Chances are they will deliberately leave out any age references to avoid any mismatched information.
I'm sure sue tried to say she was 16 before now and others apparently think she was 18 despite Chris being living proof against that.
 
AllieBee said:
90s Life FB page has a cracking headline, Sue was 7 when they first met. I would like to think that they are insinuating that Noel the Paedophile groomed her from that age. Comments on that aren't as complimentary as some we've seen!
Click to expand...
Oooooh, any chance of som screenshots please?? 🤭
---
Blue_ocean said:
With the new house is it fenced or quite open??
Hadn't thought about it before but the dogs are so used to being confined within the garden walls if it was quite open then wouldn't it be an issue for the dogs?
Most people train their dogs so it's just this lot that I can see potential run offs.
Click to expand...
It’s your chance Lola!!! Run girl…be free!!! 🐕‍🦺🐾🐾
 
Honey JuJu said:
Oooooh, any chance of som screenshots please?? 🤭
---

It’s your chance Lola!!! Run girl…be free!!! 🐕‍🦺🐾🐾
Click to expand...
Here you go, tbh there's 2.4k comments, but interestingly to nearly every leave them alone comment there's a reply saying he's a n.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20240119_213312_Facebook.jpg
    Screenshot_20240119_213312_Facebook.jpg
    47.2 KB · Views: 44
  • Screenshot_20240119_213928_Facebook.jpg
    Screenshot_20240119_213928_Facebook.jpg
    56.4 KB · Views: 43
  • Screenshot_20240119_214317_Facebook.jpg
    Screenshot_20240119_214317_Facebook.jpg
    73 KB · Views: 39
  • Screenshot_20240119_214439_Facebook.jpg
    Screenshot_20240119_214439_Facebook.jpg
    64.9 KB · Views: 36
Intothedark said:
Lovely, another holiday. All the while the tax player is shelling out for social housing, the nhs and schooling for her huge brood. I often wondered if either of their biological parents would come forward, but they’re probably too embarrassed by Noel and Scratty. I’d have a tiny bit more respect if they talked about budgeting, secondhand clothing or managing a large family but they’re greedy pigs.
Click to expand...

The Genes are so strong in all those kids I’m now watching wondering if Sue & Noel are in fact related!
 
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Back
Top