Archie is ~6½ according to their wiki...not that that makes it any better, but he is a bit older than he seemsArchie a 4/5 year old got a ps5 and what looked like a TV too
The piles of presents infront of each person is actually sickening taller than them more so when they sat there and said the kids aren't spoilt get one main present and some smaller things that aged well didn't it!
Ipads, iPhone,uggs shoes and earmuffs, 2 silver cross prams, endless dolls, huge dolls houses/campers, computers and such and so much more on top of the week long disneyland trip.
Not one of the kids appreciated what they got mostly because of sue and her camera waiting impatiently for them to open everything.
The boys didn't get much attention bless caspar just enjoying his chocolate amongst the chaos the only calm child.
How has noone investigated where the money comes from its not the pies or the youtube channel either
Yes they get paid for the show but it can't be endless.
With the bills, shopping, general life, house buying it doesn't add up.
I think I've worked it out. Someone on an earlier thread said they might get DLA for some of the kids. DLA is not checked. I've had ours since October and I spoke to the benefits advisor at the council today (for something unrelated to DLA) and she was telling me it never gets checked ever. As long as the child recieving it is living with that parent then thats how.
I claim carers allowance, again it's not checked. Say 4 kids on DLA, 4 of them claiming Carers allowance. It'll get them round the 3 child UC rule as any child on DLA is ignored for the purposes of the cap, it'll also be how they get round fines and taking the kids out of school. My daughters school told me I can take her out and I will not get fined because she's on DLA.
And a family member of mine gets attendance allowance as their spouse had a serious stroke and has been left dependent and it doesn't even cover the weekly care bill for one half hour visit daily.
These greedy lot have their hand in everything don't they? Is there something a little less than legal going on?
Are they all being sponsored by EasyJet?The matching pyjama and present shot says it all.
The children are identikit. Their parents have no idea about the children’s individual likes or styles.
Just nauseating…wasnt long ago they didnt even have sheets on their beds let alone matching pajamas…scrounging, lying, leeches who revel in all this vulgar display of ill gotten wealth and proceed to rub everyones nose in it…hope they enjoy it while it lasts- feckless, sponging twats…They must have spent thousands. New iPhones, PCs, iPad, Lego, UGG boots, Barbie dream house and camper, so much stuff, and then a trip to Disney straight after
View attachment 2668156 qView attachment 2668161 qView attachment 2668162 qView attachment 2668163 qView attachment 2668164 qView attachment 2668165 qView attachment 2668166 qView attachment 2668167 qView attachment 2668168 q
The matching pyjama and present shot says it all.
The children are identikit. Their parents have no idea about the children’s individual likes or styles.
Who was that gormless twit boy who opened up that iPad and just said “oh cool I do actually need a new one”. Then just proceeded to put it down.
Sorry, what. A new one? So you’ve already got one? And where’s the “thank you”??!
I would absolutely not be ok with posting this online for the world to see. I would be highly embarrassed if these were my children.
Sue really does put so much on those older girls, doesn’t she? So many times in the present vlog you hear the littles asking for Katie/Aimee/Ellie to show them things or ask for help. They didn’t even open their presents right away as presumably they knew they wouldn’t have any peace. Notice the older boys didn’t.
They clearly know they’ll get more attention from their siblings than their own parents, and on Christmas Day of all days. And then it’s Ellie (and Noel) thinking to pull out the big bags while Sue sits in her grinch pyjamas amongst all the paper like an overgrown toddler.
Those three didn’t even seem to recognise what the Ugg headphones were, so I assume they didn’t ask for them and that was Sue just buying “designer” things. Ellie seemed more pleased with the hot water bottle!
I’m really not surprised they’ve all ended up as young parents with no proper careers so far, as they’re just not given a chance, are they?
they'reControversial opinion but I don't feel like the kids have anything to be grateful for having those two as parents. Yes they seem to be provided for in a material sense but there's no actual nurturing towards them, not to mention their parents exploit them daily. That lifestyle is funded by the kids essentially as there the ones that bring the views in because it peaks interest on how a large family copes. Normally I'd agree that kids should be polite and say thankyou for things but honestly in this scenario the parents in question don't deserve any thanks whatsoever.
I understand what you’re sayingControversial opinion but I don't feel like the kids have anything to be grateful for having those two as parents. Yes they seem to be provided for in a material sense but there's no actual nurturing towards them, not to mention their parents exploit them daily. That lifestyle is funded by the kids essentially as there the ones that bring the views in because it peaks interest on how a large family copes. Normally I'd agree that kids should be polite and say thankyou for things but honestly in this scenario the parents in question don't deserve any thanks whatsoever.
---
*
they're
---
Not sure I've explained the point of view very well but basically imagine having a camera shoved in your face 24/7, being given small portions, not clothed properly (as in incorrect sizing, looking at you susan), not having your basic emotional needs met, being made to go to school jet lagged for an unnecessary holiday, being rail roaded into babysitting your younger siblings constantly, not being given your own space, I could go on the list is endless. But it's okay because we've spent x amount of £'s this year with some branded/designer gifts, I don't know what sane person would show any gratefulness for that
Regardless of how much they have spent on them in a year, there's no excuse for children not having basic manners. Once or twice I might forgive, blame it on over excitement, but those kids never say thank youControversial opinion but I don't feel like the kids have anything to be grateful for having those two as parents. Yes they seem to be provided for in a material sense but there's no actual nurturing towards them, not to mention their parents exploit them daily. That lifestyle is funded by the kids essentially as there the ones that bring the views in because it peaks interest on how a large family copes. Normally I'd agree that kids should be polite and say thankyou for things but honestly in this scenario the parents in question don't deserve any thanks whatsoever.
---
*
they're
---
Not sure I've explained the point of view very well but basically imagine having a camera shoved in your face 24/7, being given small portions, not clothed properly (as in incorrect sizing, looking at you susan), not having your basic emotional needs met, being made to go to school jet lagged for an unnecessary holiday, being rail roaded into babysitting your younger siblings constantly, not being given your own space, I could go on the list is endless. But it's okay because we've spent x amount of £'s this year with some branded/designer gifts, I don't know what sane person would show any gratefulness for that