The Ingham Family #64 Everyone's being groomed. Except Prinny.

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
1

Attachments

  • 547AAE82-4F1A-40ED-8447-6BC94B2A216A.png
    547AAE82-4F1A-40ED-8447-6BC94B2A216A.png
    88.8 KB · Views: 188
  • 3FE82A95-4B1A-4E60-9547-6CFBF46A9FD0.png
    3FE82A95-4B1A-4E60-9547-6CFBF46A9FD0.png
    77.2 KB · Views: 181
  • A13F75A4-AED2-445B-ACFD-72A1CFF93B4E.png
    A13F75A4-AED2-445B-ACFD-72A1CFF93B4E.png
    90.2 KB · Views: 176
  • 75C92576-9C15-4440-AAD7-F3D7D5648D57.png
    75C92576-9C15-4440-AAD7-F3D7D5648D57.png
    77.4 KB · Views: 170
Web30 said:
We felt the same when we went thier last year. Its a rip off like those blankets.

Id also like to know what skate company hes working for, sounds a bit cash in hand as sarah said it would cover spending money plus trips for thier holl. Wouldnt get it that fast if it wasnt surely?
Click to expand...
Hmm ,guess that`s more undeclared income... :unsure: Wonder if they`ve paid their tax bill yet??
 
louisana said:
I've been reading some of these posts over the past few weeks and not knowing whether to post or not. Chris has been grooming young girls for a very long time. This is not a recent thing. Back to the days when there was MSN I remember him adding me and he went under the name as 'Rich' who lived near Leeds. This would be dating back to 2005-2006 when I would have been 15-16 years old. I always remember him sending numerous inappropriate messages and asking to meet up if I was ever visiting Leeds. Watching that video of him hugging those young girls is just disturbing. Why does he think it is acceptable to do this? I cannot understand why this woman is with him. He makes me feel sick.
Click to expand...
Thanks for sharing your story, I’m certain you’re not alone x
 
The only people here who seemingly believe they are untouchable and can say or do what they want without consequence is you Chris, you, the lying dirty, cheating scumbag, that disgusting, lowlife cretin wife of yours and not forgetting gruesome, grooming granny!
You are the ones seriously unhinged here, no one else!!
 
BattyBits said:
Oh my word... homeless
Click to expand...

He's such a BSer. Trying to manipulate young girls again, so the Inghams can keep their gravy train of not working apart from using their small children to sell their private life to the world. I don't think adults should be allowed to make money from using small children like that. It reminds me of Victorian times when children could be used to make money. Hope there are people in that support group who won't let Chris manipulate young, innocent girls for his gain.
 
BattyBits said:
Oh my word... homeless
Click to expand...
Thanks for sharing.
He will now be checking here to see if it has been posted, he is so transparent - keep it off the main social media but still try and get his little message across 🤣 what makes me laugh is he actually states a couple of times how long they have been “trolled” for - leading exactly back to when his n activities all came to light.

Dear Chris Mingham,
Sorry perv - it ain’t trolling. People saw you for what you really were - 18 months ago as you helpfully state - when your dirty little habits were exposed. Intimidating your young fans won’t achieve anything. I won’t ever stop until you stop 😉 ps, cut your fingernails
 
BattyBits said:
Oh my word... homeless
Click to expand...
He continues to say this and yet none of the girls who were named in the paper have had anything “legal” from them and that speaks volumes.🤷🏻‍♀️ That’s worded so manipulative & also talking about when he says about the girls who “you all look up to” does that not give the impression quite a few of the members of this group are young teens? So surely messaging them, regardless of whether it’s public or not is still somewhat suspicious? Especially with the undertone of this.

I do not understand why they continue to talk about the lies when literally more evidence is coming to light? Even just the way they talk, things that have been said - down to the whole thing with Jane and Charlie.. how can that much evidence be falsified? It truly cannot.,

but thank you Chris for just bringing up again what happened 18 months ago because you have just brought the attention truly back on it & away from some somewhat debatable attempts at good parenting.
 
I’m genuinely curious as to what they receive and go through on a daily basis, at first I gave them the benefit of the doubt and thought that if they genuinely were receiving hateful or worrying messages then they should absolutely have the full force of the law behind them but I’m really wondering now if they see Twitter or us magnificent beasts over here on Tattle as direct abuse? If so they could just not access Twitter or tattle maybe? Then they wouldn’t have to go through this immense battle every day, if it’s the young girl contacting brands, well you e made your own bed there, I wouldn’t expect to be taking my pick of the advertisement deals if I’d done what he has. From the way he portrays it they’re opening up parcels of exploding dogshit every morning and somehow I doubt that.
 
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Back
Top