The Ingham Family #354 Sarah gormless Ingham can’t see what’s happening in front of her eyes

[hssdrs]

Yet Sarah shows she has put about 6 cheap phone cases in the December basket for the girls , surely they should have got one of their OLLi ones

They should be seen out & out with the Mech on plus the phone case. However they can't because they don't have any of the mech as it's done through a company that makes/prints when the orders come in hence why it's so expensive.

 

[Rosie Tatler]

They should be seen out & out with the Mech on plus the phone case. However they can't because they don't have any of the mech as it's done through a company that makes/prints when the orders come in hence why it's so expensive.

Shows how hard up they're then that they couldn’t order some phone cases for the girls ,

Surely at least Chrish should have a hoodie and a beany on !

Then again that will confirm who he is to people that might see him creeping out and about !

 

[MissWinnie]

‘They look dope’ - the chances they even have one in hand is slim to none. If it was decent, quality merchandise they’d have samples of everything themselves. I bet if the case arrives it will have the ‘made in China’ wording on it. Making claims like that he knows not to be true falls under false advertising.

Someone complaining about Baby and Me not making a return

Also noticed Cash4Kids is a Bauer Media owned charity. Anyone contacted them, especially if they’ve got under 18s volunteering on the premises?

 

[heidilouxx]

‘They look dope’ - the chances they even have one in hand is slim to none. If it was decent, quality merchandise they’d have samples of everything themselves. I bet if the case arrives it will have the ‘made in China’ wording on it. Making claims like that he knows not to be true falls under false advertising.

Someone complaining about Baby and Me not making a return

Also noticed Cash4Kids is a Bauer Media owned charity. Anyone contacted them, especially if they’ve got under 18s volunteering on the premises?
View attachment 3298512 qView attachment 3298530 q

“Logistics between our supplier and here were too difficult to be ready in time” - so the supplier is in a different country & the products wouldn’t be ready in time? But it’s not from China?

 

[EyeSpy71]

Me neither

 

[Neck lace]

Four memories for this week's Memory Monday. The first is from October 2019, just after brave Charlie Dyball came forward with her account of how Granny Jane had befriended and groomed her when she was 16. Jane told her that she loved her; gifted her Ingham merch; told her information on the Inghams that other fans didn't know and then asked Charlie to do things for her in return - such as run a 'get Jane back' campaign and to ask Jess to take down her tweets about Chrish. Charlie was manipulated and used by Jane and when she realised what had happened to her, she recounted on twitter all of what she had been through with Jane. Jane put up a story on her Instagram the next day, claiming that she was 'bemused' if she had made Charlie feel uncomfortable and that she was 'very confused as to why Charlie would feel that there was anything unsavoury or abnormal about our chats ever'.Typical narcissist. Doing dreadful things and then claiming to have not done anything wrong. Always the victims are Jane and her dreadful son Chrish. Jane took her story down almost immediately after posting but someone managed to screenshot the first part of it.

The second memory is from March 2021, when Sarah bought a very lot of Easter eggs in her local Morrison's and said that she had put them all in a food bank donation bin. @BD10Massive posted that she shopped at the same Morrison's as Sarah and that there was not a food bank donation bin in the store...In the Easter Sunday vlog from that year, we saw the girls receiving eggs that looked very much like the ones that Sarah said she had donated.

The third memory, also from March 2021, is when @Ziggzaggz said that they had great respect for Nanna - for telling Sarah that she was "stupid" every time she got pregnant .

For the last memory, we remember when in April 2021, tattlers were suggesting that Sarah may have a CMV virus, which is a herpes virus. @paolo researched the virus and listed the symptoms that a mother with CMV can pass to her baby. It can apparently cause hearing problems and vision problems for the baby. Tattlers have recently pointed out that Aurora seems to have the same eye problem as Jace and may also have a hearing problem - because she makes very few sounds. Hopefully, Aurora has not been affected and starts babbling soon. It is obviously not Sarah's fault if she does have the CMV virus. It's just that she needs to find out if she has it and then she can choose not to breastfeed her next baby (the virus can be passed through breast milk).

 

[Footballgirl]

They are using their own address for any contact or refund issues It’s not on the contact info but it is buried in the Privacy Policy if you scroll right down the page. I’m sure they are missing some other legally required info but haven’t had a full read. I can’t see any VAT registered details on the website? Has Katrina finally put her foot down to any business activity at her address?

Also, Google ShopOlli and the website was originally linked to a woman’s clothing brand. Nothing to do with this newest scam comes up at all unless you use the web address in full View attachment 3297579 qView attachment 3297580 qView attachment 3297581 qView attachment 3297582 qView attachment 3297583 qView attachment 3297584 q

They changed the business address to the accountant in York when it was pointed out on here they had a outstanding CCJ Katrina probably didn’t want any high court enforcement going to her home

 

[skyelau]

Won't this latest shop have to be registered to Dubai not to pay tax on it? The quote on store about saving the earth etc etc and then their house is rammed with plastic tat lol

 

[GreaseMop]

If Jace and Mila are now into the elves and get them, hopefully that means they'll keep Esme and especially Isla out of being so heavily overinvested in them. They can just go along with it for the younger ones but no crying because Chrish 'nutted' one, no carrying them round the house in a glass and no being scared of them and banning them from their rooms.

 

[mags]

Also noticed Cash4Kids is a Bauer Media owned charity. Anyone contacted them, especially if they’ve got under 18s volunteering on the premises?

Not yet but I intend to! (I suspect that Sarah's "friend" might head up that particular centre so I'll contact HQ directly.)

I assume that the no under 18s policy is probably due to safeguarding and/or insurance restrictions, so it could have serious repercussions even if it seems a bit of a trivial gripe.

Obviously my main concern is the Ingham Family brand undermining the good work of the charity. A kids charity being linked to a controversial brand synonymous with child grooming is not ideal.

Then there's the greed and overconsumption angle. Fancy having the cheek to promote the "Mission for Christmas" campaign when your own mission is to go viral again, recreating this...

Not a good look!

Most people in the UK will already be very familiar with this charity (advertised across the Bauer/Rayo radio station network) so I doubt this puny effort would've made any difference. Yes, the whole family should generally be doing A VERY LOT more to help others but this PR stunt was pretty farcical.

 

[Web30]

It'll be intresting to see if Esme posts anything about the elves on her tiktok or if it'll just be reactions for the vlogs. I can't see her admitting she believes on there when she's posting about romance novels and brands she's in to.

 

[mags]

Do the Inghams have some kind of business relationship with Emirates Airlines?

Just wondering about their Vlogmas intro. Does anyone know if this brand imagery would be protected by copyright/trademark law? It's obviously a simplified version of the real design but still instantly recognisable livery so I wonder if they have any necessary permission.

 

[MissWinnie]

Do the Inghams have some kind of business relationship with Emirates Airlines?

Just wondering about their Vlogmas intro. Does anyone know if this brand imagery would be protected by copyright/trademark law? It's obviously a simplified version of the real design but still instantly recognisable livery so I wonder if they have any necessary permission.

View attachment 3298646 q

Good point and very doubtful any permission has been sought.
---
As if he’s used the name Rordy in the sign off on the description when everyone else gets their actual names written down. That poor girl.

 

[Sakkiedekock]

Good point and very doubtful any permission has been sought.

Now if someone should inform, I would image Emirates has attack dog lawyers ready to strike!

 

[Abbvay]

It makes it so much worse to have the volunteering segment in the same vlog as the December box haul. Their over consumption generally makes them a bad choice to represent a charity based around ensuring that all children at least receive something for Christmas. But to show the girls (especially Esme) looking so bored and acting like she's tired out from the "work", then minutes later showing the huge amount those same girls will be receiving just as a starter to Christmas doesn't sit right and they should be ashamed to not only not care whilst vlogging it, but totally ignore or not realise when editing either.

Talking about how full the car was for however many children from a school like they would be getting so many presents - when they have to take a trailer/campervan away with them at Christmas just for their own children's presents.

 

[MissWinnie]

Email for anyone wishing to contact Cashforkids. Not worth contacting the base they went to locally if it’s a ‘friend’ as someone else has said because it will likely be swept under the carpet. I’d be worried incase data protection was broken as well and it was sent to the Minghams. It’s unforgivable that they’ve posted that footage on the same vlog where she’s showing off bags of presents for just 6 kids to open 1st December but then also go on to release overpriced merchandise all within the same vlog.

I hope heads roll for whoever made the decision that it would be a good idea for this lot to attend.

---

It makes it so much worse to have the volunteering segment in the same vlog as the December box haul. Their over consumption generally makes them a bad choice to represent a charity based around ensuring that all children at least receive something for Christmas. But to show the girls (especially Esme) looking so bored and acting like she's tired out from the "work", then minutes later showing the huge amount those same girls will be receiving just as a starter to Christmas doesn't sit right and they should be ashamed to not only not care whilst vlogging it, but totally ignore or not realise when editing either.

Talking about how full the car was for however many children from a school like they would be getting so many presents - when they have to take a trailer/campervan away with them at Christmas just for their own children's presents.

She didn’t even batter an eye lid when saying that the value of the gifts those children would receive were around the £40 mark did she. No consideration whatsoever, this was a complete flex.

 

[mags]

Well it wasn't very difficult to figure out who Sarah's "good friend" at the charity is, based on the information Sarah herself has shared with the world. (An employee but not the Manager.) It's like Atlanta & her mum all over again....regular Disney-goers, longstanding ifam with ingham family merch etc, also fans of Radfords. I wonder if Zoe & Atlanta have been binned off now?

 

[lipsthefish]

Not yet but I intend to! (I suspect that Sarah's "friend" might head up that particular centre so I'll contact HQ directly.)

I assume that the no under 18s policy is probably due to safeguarding and/or insurance restrictions, so it could have serious repercussions even if it seems a bit of a trivial gripe.

Obviously my main concern is the Ingham Family brand undermining the good work of the charity. A kids charity being linked to a controversial brand synonymous with child grooming is not ideal.

Then there's the greed and overconsumption angle. Fancy having the cheek to promote the "Mission for Christmas" campaign when your own mission is to go viral again, recreating this...

Not a good look!

View attachment 3298607 q

Most people in the UK will already be very familiar with this charity (advertised across the Bauer/Rayo radio station network) so I doubt this puny effort would've made any difference. Yes, the whole family should generally be doing A VERY LOT more to help others but this PR stunt was pretty farcical.

I totally understand that I'm asking you to provide free labour, tell me to bugger off if you want! Would you be able to post a rough idea of what you email to the companies, if really like to report it too but I'm not the best at putting messages together.

 

[MissWinnie]

Well it wasn't very difficult to figure out who Sarah's "good friend" at the charity is, based on the information Sarah herself has shared with the world. (An employee but not the Manager.) It's like Atlanta & her mum all over again....regular Disney-goers, longstanding ifam with ingham family merch etc, also fans of Radfords. I wonder if Zoe & Atlanta have been binned off now?

Sure her name has been mentioned before? Or am I thinking of comments made? Why are they allowing their kids to create friendships with iFam - the mind boggles as these are strangers obsessing and pushing their kids onto the Ingham children any way they can do.

 

[mags]

Sure her name has been mentioned before? Or am I thinking of comments made? Why are they allowing their kids to create friendships with iFam - the mind boggles as these are strangers obsessing and pushing their kids onto the Ingham children any way they can do.

I'm not sure what the Inghams have mentioned previously but Sarah isn't exactly discreet so maybe it's common knowledge. (I'd not heard of this woman before but the daughter has possibly been mentioned...not too sure.) It's bizarre though, not keeping ifam at a distance, I agree.

Would you be able to post a rough idea of what you email to the companies, if really like to report it too but I'm not the best at putting messages together.

I can't atm, sorry. I'll try later, if you're still stuck, unless anyone else has something to hand? I know @Kikini Bamalam posted a template a while back, if you can search old threads for that, for pointers. I also like @MissWinnie 's idea of mentioning the Deezer takedown request as a recent example of a major organisation taking the grooming allegations seriously. I wouldn't get too hung up on the wording though, I'm sure they'll get the message x