The Ingham Family #343 Dubai Yourself A Wig, Chrish?

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
1
1335teddyade said:
A friend of mine went through this with his son. Split from the partner, she manipulated the son into thinking the dad was a very bad man (abusive, didn't care etc) which couldn't be further from the truth. Lied to the courts, blocked the dad from the child's social media and threw away any letters he wrote in an attempt to communicate with his son. She essentially told her child that if he ever decided to have contact with his dad, she would cut him out of the family and never speak to him again. Thankfully he is an adult now and has a great relationship with his dad and is making up for many years of missed time with him.

We don't know the situation with Izzy's real Dad. Maybe he is a deadbeat and doesn't care. But maybe he has tried his hardest to have contact with Izzy, but unfortunately Sarah and Chris have manipulated her and got in her head. It's unfair of us to make assumptions or judge when we don't know the full story.
Click to expand...
Whatever his excuse may be, there is no getting away from the fact that ‘his hardest’ wasn’t good enough.
 
MissWinnie said:
Sarah’s talking about Nana Jean starting to use WhatsApp & how it’s the ‘cutest thing ever’. Chris in the background immediately says ‘no it’s not’. What a vile little gnome he is 😡 Nana probably doesn’t have many years left and he’s dragged her granddaughter and great grandchildren half way across the world for his own benefit. To then say things like that on camera is just awful. Sarah holds up a phone screen full of missed calls from her :( Dropping themselves in it again though as it is illegal to make voice or video calls on WhatsApp over there. View attachment 3060919 q
Click to expand...
That is so sad and proves what a controller he is, get the family as faraway as possible from close family, so you are the one they rely on, then make derogatory remarks about said family and sabotage contact.
For all we know about Sarah, and I make no excuses for her, she probably could have been a much better person without him controlling her. He picked her out, a vulnerable single parent with insecurities stemming from childhood through to young motherhood and the type of girl that feels she needs a man in her life constantly.
Poor old Nana Jean, brought her up, and is now practically tit on, ignoring her calls etc... I actually don't believe Sarah is happy about this situation at all.
Again, I dislike the woman, her defensiveness , her parroting chrish's views , but I feel he is a lot to blame and found a victim in her.
 
Just watching the interaction between them all as they floated around the pool was sad.
Isabelle happy to stay in Dubai, hanging out with her toddler siblings playing mum. Her life is completely empty and she is in absolutely no rush to do anything about that. In fact she seems to be in her element. Most exciting thing that happens is her shopping for cute hello kitty niknaks. Tragic.
Esme and Isla interacting they way you would expect far far younger kids to.
Sarah not satisfied with her earlier ranting, felt the need to bring it to the pool and involve Isabelle.
Answering questions she wants and dodging ones she wants to forget.
Not many right thinking people see these kids as spoiled or lucky. They have been robbed of their privacy and often their dignity. And their safety is just an afterthought to their money greedy parents.
 
I believe that Izzy’s dad didn’t want her on YouTube, Sarah and Chris then really worked to poison Izzy’s mind against him, they are the type to throw serious allegations at him and manipulate Izzy into saying things that weren’t true.

I really feel sorry for him and his family as knowing how Chris controls everything I don’t think they had any chance of keeping her in their lives
 
charlotte_98 said:
Just watching the interaction between them all as they floated around the pool was sad.
Isabelle happy to stay in Dubai, hanging out with her toddler siblings playing mum. Her life is completely empty and she is in absolutely no rush to do anything about that. In fact she seems to be in her element. Most exciting thing that happens is her shopping for cute hello kitty niknaks. Tragic.
Esme and Isla interacting they way you would expect far far younger kids to.
Sarah not satisfied with her earlier ranting, felt the need to bring it to the pool and involve Isabelle.
Answering questions she wants and dodging ones she wants to forget.
Not many right thinking people see these kids as spoiled or lucky. They have been robbed of their privacy and often their dignity. And their safety is just an afterthought to their money greedy parents.
Click to expand...
The thing is, if she loves children so much she should have had the opportunity to pursue that career wise. She was robbed of that, just like she's going to be robbed of the chance to have a child of her own. She's 19, lives in a cupboard and has no autonomy. He stepfather confiscates her phone, that's such a gross overstep.
 
So so so sorry if I’m late to the party, life gets busy. But I’m just sat watching some IG stories on my break and this ad comes up?! She’s working with Amazon?!
IMG_5908.png
 
Emzykins said:
So so so sorry if I’m late to the party, life gets busy. But I’m just sat watching some IG stories on my break and this ad comes up?! She’s working with Amazon?!
View attachment 3062274 q
Click to expand...
Yep, I messaged Amazon a few days ago to proclaim my disgust 😂 cancelled my Amazon kids subscription and said that’s the reason why. (I was already planning to cancel it before this, but they don’t need to know that 🤣) they haven’t responded to me yet.
 
Malcolm Conkers said:
Whatever his excuse may be, there is no getting away from the fact that ‘his hardest’ wasn’t good enough.
Click to expand...

Whilst I do agree to some extent, I imagine Izzy's wishes would have also been taken into account where court is involved. She would have been very young and impressionable. We already know she is controlled and manipulated. It's not far fetched to think that Sarah and Chris may have put ideas into her head, or even emotionally blackmailed her. If Izzy has refused further contact with her Dad for these reasons, there's not much else he can really do other than sit, wait and hope that one day she reaches out to him. We can only hope that the day comes where she opens her eyes and he welcomes her with open arms...
 
1335teddyade said:
Whilst I do agree to some extent, I imagine Izzy's wishes would have also been taken into account where court is involved. She would have been very young and impressionable. We already know she is controlled and manipulated. It's not far fetched to think that Sarah and Chris may have put ideas into her head, or even emotionally blackmailed her. If Izzy has refused further contact with her Dad for these reasons, there's not much else he can really do other than sit, wait and hope that one day she reaches out to him. We can only hope that the day comes where she opens her eyes and he welcomes her with open arms...
Click to expand...
They have never mentioned court though, have they? And Sarah definitely would have pulled that one out of the bag, how she won in court or got full parental rights etc. I have no idea what happened, but odd that so many defend him having no clue that he has done anything to even try and help Isabelle. All we see is her stuck as a prisoner, no education, forced to work for most of her childhood and living with two very dangerous parents.
 
1335teddyade said:
Whilst I do agree to some extent, I imagine Izzy's wishes would have also been taken into account where court is involved. She would have been very young and impressionable. We already know she is controlled and manipulated. It's not far fetched to think that Sarah and Chris may have put ideas into her head, or even emotionally blackmailed her. If Izzy has refused further contact with her Dad for these reasons, there's not much else he can really do other than sit, wait and hope that one day she reaches out to him. We can only hope that the day comes where she opens her eyes and he welcomes her with open arms...
Click to expand...
You give up because it’s not worth the bother in things like parking disputes, not your child’s life being ruined for money, and to prop up an infamous child sex predator.
 
1335teddyade said:
Whilst I do agree to some extent, I imagine Izzy's wishes would have also been taken into account where court is involved. She would have been very young and impressionable. We already know she is controlled and manipulated. It's not far fetched to think that Sarah and Chris may have put ideas into her head, or even emotionally blackmailed her. If Izzy has refused further contact with her Dad for these reasons, there's not much else he can really do other than sit, wait and hope that one day she reaches out to him. We can only hope that the day comes where she opens her eyes and he welcomes her with open arms...
Click to expand...
I agree. I bet When she was away from home the other two got to do loads of things she would’ve liked and to be fair, we do not know whether this therapy wasn’t part of a court case. I can’t see lazy and creepy shelling out for anything like that despite being minted at that point. Coercive Creepy would not have volunteered for Izzy to open up to a stranger unless he was very confident about the control he had over the situation.
All of those kids have been coerced into appearing on camera. Lazy admitted that in her latest tit show when she said about them living their best lives thanks to YouTube
 
YoungHollywood said:
They have never mentioned court though, have they? And Sarah definitely would have pulled that one out of the bag, how she won in court or got full parental rights etc. I have no idea what happened, but odd that so many defend him having no clue that he has done anything to even try and help Isabelle. All we see is her stuck as a prisoner, no education, forced to work for most of her childhood and living with two very dangerous parents.
Click to expand...

Sarah was too busy manipulating the narrative she had been abused by him, over and over. She got a lot of comments on that vlog about it by various people saying she was a liar, all deleted and she then claimed it wasn’t Isabelle’s dad to her on another vlog. They’ve been chased for benefit fraud, the letters shown by accident in a clip, as has other stuff. They hide the stuff they consider won’t paint them in a good light (and yes I know just how shocking it is that they think what they do post does). There’s no way they would have advertised that after what happened with her DV vlog, which I think was setting the stage for end of contact.

Her dad’s family reached out to her when she turned 18. There are screenshots on those threads proving they reached out and when they were blocked.

Sometimes a persons best just isn't good enough. Despite doing all I could police dropped the case I was involved in, supposedly ‘zero tolerance and automatic custody’ (he was released within 24 hours); when broke bail I was laughed at and told to do mindfulness; they didn’t even tell me I was being abandoned to live in a building with a dangerous man, eventually a complaint meant two officers turned up (in riot gear) to tell me everything was fine and if I had problems to phone 999, which I’d done repeatedly and was laughed at. Effort isn’t all it takes. I now must protect myself and can’t.

We can never know what happened and never will, but I know it’s not as simple as trying hard enough, or even the law being on your side because things just don’t work like that.

And, yes he could be useless. He could have taken money and sold his daughter off to have zero privacy and put all over the internet including dark web but then why would he and others in his family restart contact on her 18th? It sounds to me like it was some sort of court order than stopped when she became a legal adult.
 
Malcolm Conkers said:
You give up because it’s not worth the bother in things like parking disputes, not your child’s life being ruined for money, and to prop up an infamous child sex predator.
Click to expand...
We all know that family courts are skewed towards mothers who have custody of the children and in the absence of any legal aid it’s very easy to run down the resources of anyone with less money than you
 
curious cookie jar said:
We all know that family courts are skewed towards mothers who have custody of the children and in the absence of any legal aid it’s very easy to run down the resources of anyone with less money than you
Click to expand...
Exactly, there is no such thing as easily obtained legal aid now. The father has other obligations and limited resources as an ordinary person while Sarah and Chris had money at one time to throw at this. Add to this the nasty, lying, conniving characters of the pair of them. I have no doubt they would outright alledge anything to get control over their, then, chief money maker.
Izzy only knows what they tell her, she is dependent on them for everything and probably has a touch of Stockholm Syndrome.
 
curious cookie jar said:
We all know that family courts are skewed towards mothers who have custody of the children and in the absence of any legal aid it’s very easy to run down the resources of anyone with less money than you
Click to expand...

Totally agree. And whilst we will probably never know what Izzy's Dad has/hasn't done, it would be unfair to throw judgement that he hasn't bothered to try or has just given up. I won't sit and defend him, because I don't know the ins and outs of the situation but it's important to remember that there's many other factors at play. Every single minute of Izzy's life is spent with Sarah and Chris, as someone else says, she only knows and is influenced by what they tell her/believe.

As a side note, I grew up seeing my Dad every other weekend. I wanted to live with my Dad full time as my Mum was often busy with work and I was dumped on childminders and I had a closer relationship with my Dad. I spent most of my childhood being told by my Mum that my Dad didn't want the responsibility of looking after me full time and I believed it. When I was 16, I found many letters between my parents (and also court letters), where my Dad had begged to have full time custody of me because he felt he could provide stability and emotional nurturing. When you're young and naive and spend the majority of your life around one parent, you will believe anything they say and will be easily influenced in your decisions/thoughts.
 
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Back
Top