ADDITIONAL POSTS BY THE FAKE RETIRED VET ACCOUNT. Sorry if I repeat myself in this post and it is long. I am thinking through these comments and typing at the same time. File all of this as IMHO, allegedly, speculation or potential working theories about the lies and cover up of the death of Ratso by the greedy gruesome twosome. As time passes, and more fake facts/ facts/ circumstantial info, behavior, etc. are considered, or discovered, the pieces of the puzzle surrounding the death of the dog continue to subtly shift
more crap from actor, loser Philip poorly playing the role of a rude, bullying, condescending, patronizing, cd fanatic/ sychophant, U.S. fake vet/ vet tech who is a defender of loser Philip. So predictable.
However, he slips up and reveals a bit of information in between allegations of vet malpractice, misinformation, lies, fake storylines, control by chaos bullshit, and continues the fake and false narrative that it was just positively establish that the tiny dog chewed on a stick or ate a peacock feather, ( which should have torn its anus/ anal region instead of punctured his esophagus, as a licensed surgical vet talked about as one source of esophageal perforation in another forum), etc. The fake account deliberately steers away from a dog bite in the throat of the tiny, thin-skinned dog, being a source of an esophageal puncture or injury ( that likely ct imaging and necessitated surgical repair, and follow up monitoring in a vet clinic).
Philip has blamed and made disparaging comments about the vet over 30+ times with this fake account. You will notice, as usual, there will be some slight variations in phrasing, and or words used to describe items differently than the average American Would use.
B
@philspurling6414
1 day ago
@jbr7300 I'm a Vet nit wit. this is not rocket science. You don't have to like them, but they didn't do anything to the dog. The Vet F'ed up big time!
LOOK, WHAT HAPPENED, SOMEWHERE IN BETWEEN DAYS OF COMMENTS, THE LOSER PHILIP RETIRED FROM HIS JOB AS A BOTH A FAKE VET AND VET TECH. 
He evidently was immensely skilled, serving both as a foul mouthed bully veterinarian and a veterinarian tech to himself at the same time! Idiot! Read what he states that “the vets at the idiot vet clinic are to blame.” I don’t believe they took the dog to two separate vet facilities. I think it was treated at the same vet clinic, that is why they would not show the outside of the clinic or any identifying information about it. They try to use the fake storyline of two separate vet at two separate clinics, screwing up and causing the death of the dog. It is all control by chaos as usual. He continues to make excuses for any neglect, or abusive conduct that has been noted in comments or forums concerning Phillip. Why so sensitive, Phillip?
@philspurling6414
3 days ago
The dog was very happy, these are short clips in time.
most pets don't like being picked up, this is no news flash! The idiot Vet Clinic, Vet's are who you should blame.
As a former DVM Vet.
Tech, it was obvious it was not an allergy and they sent him back to stephanie. It's obvious in ALL the vlogs the dog was happy and also close to Stephanie and Marie. A
lot of animals don't trust men and he never seemed that into Phillip and vice versa, that's for sure.
The dog didn't hate P, would have rather been with Steph.
No abuse at ALL was ever evident. the nails on stone and wood always sound like that with tiny dog breeds and cats. We also have stone & wood floors. There is also an inbetween stage where it is louder.
It's the Vet's fault, he swollowed part of a stick sharp end of a feather something etc...as most dogs do. He's very tiny.
More times than not, you will find the the cause to this injury in & around the anal area, with this not so common medical condition. Blame the vets, I
was sick to my stomach how ignorant these Vets were on their way to the South Of France. I don''t blame the dog, I'm not a fan of Phillip either.
Also most dogs are not in porters like cats in travel. Heck many ride in the bed of pick up trucks. Not a good idea, but if this was a big dog in the back seat, no one would have care.
again, it's the Vet's fault. Time is everything and they blew it off as an allergy! Have a good day.
*
Look how loser Philip tells on himself?…”It's funny, everyone's a Vet now.” . Well, no not everyone is a vet, he is now back to being a vet tech versus a veterinarian In this comment And doesn’t mention that he is retired. Look at the damage control he is doing, blaming the vet. Did you notice how he has decided that the diagnosis was not that another dog bit thin skinned tiny Ratso in the neck and punctured its esophagus but instead his clung to a possible cause of esophageal injuries that could be caused by eating a stick or feather and repeatedly presents it as truth, and as a dispositive diagnosis made by medical professional too late due to vet malpractice, and that the dog died as a result in the gruesome twosome and sadly and unfortunately, caused the death of their irritating and annoying tiny dog.
The account then goes onto erroneously state that usually you have a tear in the anus rather than an esophageal puncture? Recall video of loser Phillip rubbing Ratso’s neck and throat at the vet office. Was he rubbing the neck and throat to hide the puncture wounds? Was the video taken prior to the diagnosis by the vet on the first evening? Did that exacerbate or worsen the puncture wounds in the esophagus of the dog? Is that why portions of the video were blurred and it wasn’t because they didn’t wanna show the dog in pain? Stephanie didn’t care about showing the dog drugged up on morphine after having air removed from underneath its tissues? What changed?
Revised theory with new info. I’m starting to believe that the first visit to the vet after they arrived at the rental home in the south of France, was actually immediately after Ratso had been bitten in the neck by Spud the dog. There was no vet visit for allergies. Allergies are the go to fake excuse of the gruesome twosome. When all else fails, they both claim to be allergic to something. if you look back at that video, Philip keeps prompting Stephanie about some of the facts that they were supposed to talk about in the car, e.g., they had a script they followed about panicked phone calls to the vet, Stephanie praising Philip for being able to remove the collar off of the dog so it didn’t suffocate, etc. (another theory, if the dog has a tight collar on its neck when it was allegedly bitten by Spud, you would have puncture marks under the fur through the flesh, but also, if the dog bit into Ratso’s collar, or pulled on the collar, those actions alone could also have caused a perforation or tear in the esophagus.)
Could it be that the dog was likely diagnosed with a potential puncture in the throat, but the gruesome twosome did not want to pay for a ct scan or pay to have the dog monitored overnight. They wanted to enjoy their vacation without dealing with the annoying and irritating dog. Remember how all the sudden Stephanie decided to blur video of the dog immediately after this visit but showed video of loser, Philip rubbing the dogs throat while waiting for the first vet visit?
They took the dog back to the rental home, the dog‘s condition deteriorated, and they took it back to the same vet office the next day, where the vet removed some of the excess air that had a escaped into the dog’s body, the least invasive procedure, but the dog probably needed a scan and surgical intervention to repair the damage to its esophagus hours earlier, but the gruesome twosome were too cheap, negligent, and uncaring to pay for the appropriate testing, and also pay for the appropriate surgery, which would cost easily in excess of a thousand euros. They wanted to take the dog home and take their chances to see if it would just heal up and get better . They did not want to pay for overnight, observation, additional testing, or potential surgery.
I have a feeling that perhaps Ratso ‘s tiny body, heart, etc.had been under such excessive stress and strain due to the esophageal puncture(s), pressure, and the delay in running the appropriate testing to determine the extent of injuries to its esophagus and the need for any surgical intervention to repair the esophagus that the dog’s condition had deteriorated to the point that it could not successfully undergo surgery OR they did a CT scan and found that the puncture/damage to the esophagus was too large, complicated, etc. and that complicated, expensive surgery would be necessary which the gruesome twosome would not pay for, OR that the dog was in such a compromised position that it likely would not recover or would have permanent deficits and the specialized care and attention from the gruesome twosome.
The cheap, gruesome twosome decided to let the irritating and annoying dog die. Stephanie lied and stated that the dog was sent home because it was so anxious and then it just had to have Stephanie’s emotional support Because it was so anxious and missed her so badly. Bullshit. We all saw the drugged out dog in the car that Stephanie kept trying to shove under her chin and close to her chest And clean that the dog was trying to cuddle with her. That was a bullshit story line. She also would not show the throat of the dog close up at all. She cut videos off immediately under the chin.
On the way back from the second vet visit, Stephanie filmed video of herself “comforting” the tiny dazed, drugged tiny dog that she knew was going to die as Philip happily shopped for new shoes and loads of hard dog biscuits suitable for large dog likes Spud. Philip gave the big speech about how he was getting treats for the upcoming arrival of Spud. Supposedly, the Jannsen parents and dog had all arrived the prior evening at the vacation home rented for all 4 of them for the the mini vacation. Remember that Phillips parents invited them to join them at the rented vacation home in the south of France. The elusive parents and dog were not spoken about or seen on camera for the rest of the mini vacation, with the exception of the five minute nervous rambling speech about buying dozens of hard dog biscuits.
When they left the vet’s office, the dog had been given morphine to sedate it until it died. Gruesome twosome could’ve been given additional morphine medication or sedative medications to administer to the dog for the next several hours or day. You never saw the dog eat or drink again. The dog died at the rental house. Stephanie then shot video with a dead dog and a dog bed by the pool, pretending it was still alive and that she was concerned and doting on the injured dog While eating olives by the pool. They had several days to craft additional lies in their story line about how the rogue unidentified vets from two separate unidentified vet practices, both victimized the gruesome twosome, and killed the dog. I have a feeling that some of the night video in the car was filmed after the dogs death as well as other portions of video
Speculation/ theory: Stephanie and Philip had already filmed video on the night that the dog was bitten in the throat, and they came up with a fake allergy storyline, with the sudden massive swelling of the dogs throat, that was so quick that Philip could barely get the collar off the dog before it suffocated/ choked, they claimed that they told the vet that the dog hadeaten nothing different for dinner. Was it difficult to get the dog collar off after it had been bitten in the neck by another large dog and its neck with swelling from the injuries? Philip always kept the collar way too tight on the dog to begin with.
See what they did, they placed the dog’s throat issues as beginning with its nightly meal ( which could’ve been the situation when Spud ate some of Ratso‘s food, Ratso attacked the larger dog in defense of his food, and the larger dog bit Ratso in the throat ( who knows how many times) to defend itself? The gruesome twosome we’re supposed to be going on a mini vacation over the weekend and we’re supposedly staying with Phillips parents ( and dog Spud). I bet they all met up at the rental home for dinner and their weekend vacation ( Philip said in the video that they were going to eat dinner with Phillips parents and he was preparing hamburgers for all of them). Philip never shows Spud the dog in the south of France, or at the dump.
loser Philip loves to use the wordsm “be a grown-up.”
@philspurling6414
22 hours ago (edited)
Almost all puppies get car sick, that's just a fact. They are also upset when first leaving the Mother & other pups i.e. home. Literally by the time they got to the hotel he acted as if he always belonged to them. He was a great dog and hardly even cried.
The Vet F'ed up, he should have never been sent back to S & P. They needed to complete all the tests ASAP and then do the nessessary surgical procedures.
Many times than not, the tear is in & around the anal canal.The dog chewed on a stick, bark, feather etc and swallowed a bit...
he lives on a farm! So much for emergency Vet care in Europe! Been there done that,
thank goodness I'm a Vet Tech...or my cat would have died.
Blame the Vet if you're being honest with yourself. It's funny, everyone's a Vet now. lol
You can dislike S&P and be a grown up and know they had nothing to do with their poor dogs death. The world is lost, sad.
look at loser Philip countering the likely scenario that the dog actually died at the rental home, and try to generate pity for the gruesome twosome as blameless victims of horrible vets.
@philspurling6414
20 hours ago (edited)
It died all alone, in a cage at a useless Emergency Vet clinic. The dippy Vet treated a deadly condition as an allergy and then sent it back to them! Then thought it was "possibly" GSE (it was, obviously) and
waited again for more tests the following day and he died with zero care waiting for help the following day. GSE has to be treated ASAP.
They even sent the dog home, terrible. I was a DVM.
S&P did nothing but try and save their dog, regardless if you like these people or not.
What's up with the tattle hate everywhere?
