No Pavlina to ensure they were secure at night.
Let’s play a Dump murder mystery game……
This doesn’t add up. It is a little strange that Fanny specifically stated that the 2 beloved by cd viewers cockerels ( who were heavily featured in many videos) went missing/died
while she was on her trip to Vienna. Pavlina took care of the chickens. When Pavlina left, Marie took care of the chickens. Stephanie was in London for New Years and returned to the Dump the first week of January, 2024. Marie left for her uk cooking classes at or around January 8, 2024. Fanny and Snorts left shortly thereafter for London and Vienna . Who was responsible for feeding and safeguarding the chickens and cockerels during that time? Amaury and/ or Ñutty. If they locked the cockerels up at night, then they would roam during the day.
Stephanie specifically made sure to state that the deaths occurred when she was out of the country. Why?? Why would this be something she had to put in the video? Hmmmmmmm……
Who was left at the Dump while Fanny, Snorts, and Marie were gone?
Nutty likely wouldn’t kill a cockerel
Amaury likely wouldn’t kill a cockerel
Molly too old to give a
tit about killing a cockerel and was not bred with an intensive prey instinct.
Ratso- untrained, neurotic, nippy, aggressive ratter dog with very high prey drive who had repeatedly been taken to visit chickens and the cockerels up close by Stephanie. Ratters are known to attack and kill chickens/ cockerels.
Has anyone thought Ratso might have chased, attacked, or mortally wounded / caused the death of one or both of the cockerels?
For example, is it possible that Ratso went with with Ñutty to feed the chickens and attacked and killed a cockerel or was outside with Nutty, who is usually talking to Amaury, or out with Amaury in the morning to go to the bathrooom with Molly, or was in the workshop with Amaury and Molly, and Ratso saw, chased and/ or attacked a cockrel in the courtyard or wandering around the Dump?
Who knows, she rarely ever tells the truth, but Stephanie claims one of the bodies of the cockrel was found, they thought it had died of natural causes? Why? No bite marks? Did it die of a broken neck or a heart attack? Why wasn’t it eaten by the predator who killed it? A well fed ratter can also kill for the joy of chasing and killing and satisfying its high prey instinct. Did Amaury and Ñutty not realize what had happened until the second cockrel disappeared or saw Ratso trying to chase chickens or one of the cockerels previously? They had not been around Ratso a lot of time before Ratso was dumped on them for care. Amaury is used to an obedient, old dog without a high prey drive.
Most dogs are not trying to deliberately kill your birds, but ratters have a very high prey drive. They are tenacious and energetic. At times, they may
simply want to chase, but even chasing can be fatal, because chickens often break their necks trying to get away, or die of heart attacks if they have no where safe to escape. Did it have a broken neck or a heart attack?
Some dogs will simply chase them until they die; some will shake a chicken to death; some will kill with one hard bite and move on to the next... but well fed pet dogs will rarely actually eat a chicken. They chase and kill just for fun. Ratters have a high prey drive/ instinct, and have chasing and killing instincts when it comes to chickens.
She claims the other cockrel was not found and must have been taken away. Could Ratso have presumably killed a second cockrel, and they haven’t found the body, or the body was left and a local scavenger like a fox ate it they are just lying? He has a taste for going after the chickens now. Do you think Ratso has killed mice in the Dump?
Stephanie have been warned by viewers about the dangers of Ratso around the chickens.
What do you think, could Stephanie be covering up that Ratso may have killed the beloved cockerels? And if Ratso chases or attacks chickens in the future, she can claim she didn’t know about his propensity to do so?
Let’s see what happens with the chickens or Ratso in the future.
