Blondeangel2515
VIP Member
Iām not just on anyones side but this thing of Shannon āchose to have kidsā could be the same as Charlie āchose not to use protection. We donāt know maybe Shannon is against abortions? I know someone who was in a DV relationship and got pregnant, her own dad told her she could get rid if she wants but she was against abortions full stop so went ahead with having a pregnancy.She chose to have these children though and now having a third so clearly likes it? I canāt feel sorry for her when sheās wanted these children and done nothing to avoid it. Having them once a week might not be ideal but how do we not know he doesnāt work all week or do 12 hour shifts. We donāt. At the end of the day if she doesnāt work and doesnāt intend on working and gets all the benefits then in my eyes she should be taking that responsibility to have her children in the week? Also itās gonna be easier for her to live alone and āget on with itā because her rent will be paid so u canāt really compare it to someone who wonāt qualify for all that. Iām sure if he got his rent paid he would have his own place. I think heās a tosser but I donāt feel sorry for Shannon and the kids look happy once a week with their dad out doing things.
We arenāt sure what Charlieās job is but likely he would probably qualify for UC top up and find a cheap flat or maybe he could sleep on his parents couch and the kids could sleep in his bed. If he stays at his parents Iām sure they would move things around for there grand children. Me and my cousin would sleep on the living room floor or couch at my nans when we stayed the night.
My nephews nan made a room for her grand kids too stay.
The staying in the hotel seems very odd too me