Taylor Swift #34 capitalist poets department

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
1
EnoughAlready said:
I don’t think with how image conscious she is that she’d particularly like the bad optics of airing all your dirty laundry in public if it went to counter suits etc and got ugly! So guess we’ll have to decipher the lyrics again as per!
Click to expand...
I don’t think airing dirty laundry is a concern of hers somehow.
joe would never actually follow through with any law suits, NDAs are usually dealt with by out of court settlements
---
ishant said:
probably. We don’t know when / if the Emma stuff actually happened either
Click to expand...
Emma and Joe shot a movie/show or whatever together in Feb/March I believe
 
Can you imagine the headlines last year if it had come out that she had been cheated on? This is Taylor. She wasn't going to let that tit out without being 'super happy' in her next relationship already.

You're losing me was already written/produced. It was damage limitation. It was actually the only thing that made me feel less uneasy about Emma.
 
ishant said:
The only person that I’d rinse would’ve to be Joe but I’m waiting until we’ll inevitably find out more 🚬🚬🚬
Click to expand...
And yet weirdly I think so many of Taylor’s fans would say “it’s justified” if she cheated and still rinse Joe.
Not justifying Joes action if he did, but the narrative is super interesting when you compare It to the non-reaction with Taylor cheating on Calvin/Tom.
 
Folkevermore said:
And yet weirdly I think so many of Taylor’s fans would say “it’s justified” if she cheated and still rinse Joe.
Not justifying Joes action if he did, but the narrative is super interesting when you compare It to the non-reaction with Taylor cheating on Calvin/Tom.
Click to expand...

hmmm yeah I guess. But then she wasn’t with Calvin / Tom for 6 years? I think it does make a difference.

also my guess is part of the problem is the way she found out about it?

Like. Were the photos on Tortured Men Group (💀💀💀🤢)? Is that why he looked shady?
Who knows
 
ishant said:
hmmm yeah I guess. But then she wasn’t with Calvin / Tom for 6 years? I think it does make a difference.

also my guess is part of the problem is the way she found out about it?

Like. Were the photos on Tortured Men Group (💀💀💀🤢)? Is that why he looked shady?
Who knows
Click to expand...
She was with Calvin for over a year though so it’s not like it wasn’t a long term relationship.
If it’s true, the “lose them how you get them” thing is clearly true
 
Also thinking if these little “crumbs” are starting to appear here and there just because Joe had the audacity to go out looking classy and well, in a week that Travis has behaved questionably and looked like a neanderthal, then the PR machine is well and truly churning, and Blondie maybe feels like being a little bit petty Betty!
 
Imagining for a moment this is true; the cheating etc doesn’t bother me as much as it could (seems things were on the rocks a long time, potentially she had something with Matty etc, etc).

It’s the weird post referencing it and effectively rubbing it in her face that would anger me more, assuming the whole narrative re the Bowery is true.
 
EnoughAlready said:
Also thinking if these little “crumbs” are starting to appear here and there just because Joe had the audacity to go out looking classy and well, in a week that Travis has behaved questionably and looked like a neanderthal, then the PR machine is well and truly churning, and Blondie maybe feels like being a little bit petty Betty!
Click to expand...
I think it’s worth mentioning that if this is true, she’s just deliberately done something that she knows will result in Emma getting death threats. Somehow I don’t think she’d do that.
 
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Back
Top