Yeah she’s taking this too far to be sharing this much detail so many weeks after, it’s very self involvedHow the actual duck is she still dragging this out!!?
Yeah she’s taking this too far to be sharing this much detail so many weeks after, it’s very self involvedHow the actual duck is she still dragging this out!!?
Absolutely disgraceful!I had an email re the ballot for next year - it says you hear in November if you get them - she clearly had them before begging for her shameful "for the gram day"
Wonder if she did a Zanna special and blocked everyone who said they didn’t want to see wedding content because it was the “wrong” answer?
No back view though with the fat spilling over the back…not so stunning thenI do genuinely think her ‘second look’ dress is stunning! It really suits her.
The fact she’s now called it wedding “content” and is asking if we’re sick of it. And the set up camera for the greatest showman dancing… maybe it was a big content fest after all sigh, can these influencers literally do anything without posting it on Instagram in the back of their minds? Also each to their own but I wouldn’t be sharing personal moments from the speeches with anyone other than my close friends and family
My friends and family have seen less of my wedding photos than I’ve seen of Tally’s - and I generally skip by most of her stories.Yeah she hired an actual wedding content creator to capture content!
It looked like a lovely wedding and I'm admittedly nosey... but I agree, I wouldn't want to share every personal moment that happened, just leave it at a few nice snaps and be done with it!
She can claim it as an expense when she’s filed her tax return so it will reduce her income and she’ll pay less taxIs some of the wedding a tax write off if she uses it for work content (like the photography and videography)
I would have to be demonstrably 'wholly and exclusively for the purposes of [her] trade' - definitely don't think she'd get away with that!She can claim it as an expense when she’s filed her tax return so it will reduce her income and she’ll pay less tax
Yeah she’s not getting that past HMRCI would have to be demonstrably 'wholly and exclusively for the purposes of [her] trade' - definitely don't think she'd get away with that!