I literally cannot look at her post anymore. Was flicking through the comments and all the huns saying “I can’t believe you have to write a disclaimer”, “you’re such a good mum” and “you know what you’re doing after 3 other kids”. Urghhhh, took everything in me not to comment to say about the annex boys and direct them over here!!!!
It’s when they’re saying things like ‘as if you’d let your baby sleep with the dogs on the sofa?!’, utterly incredulous that she’s even had to write such a disclaimer about a thing when it’s so blinking obvious.
So, of course she wouldn’t let Rose
sleep with the dogs on the sofa, but it’s perfectly ok for her to
pose a sleeping dog draped all over her. Oh and this is a rescue puppy who she’s not certain of the background of and she’s had a matter of months. Right, yes, I’m glad they clarified that as it makes much more sense when it’s explained.
Dog forbid if that dog was startled, woke suddenly or for a myriad of other reasons we don’t know and probably wouldn’t understand not being dogs and all, snapped; it would take seconds. It doesn’t always have to be the worst case scenario like a bite either, what there was a sudden loud noise and Teddy (or Peanut) jumped up and either put all their weight on her tiny little body, scratched her with their claws or something similar? Since her ‘just being there’ involves her being a couple of metres away behind a phone it would have already happened before she then had time to react, however quickly that would be. Still, least she has got a lovely photo out of the whole mess hasn’t she?!
The sad thing is, like others have said, it’s not just her, stupid cow she is, putting her children at risk, it’s the then undoubtedly scores of her fans who then pose their sleeping children with animals in an effort to copy her.
I know to her being ‘famous’ means not having to have a proper job whilst having her sheep defend her every move however ludicrous her actions may be, but she also has a social responsibility and she should remember that. Her stupidity posted on line doesn’t stop with her as her doing it means she’s paving the way for umpteen others to do the same in a bid to be like her.
This then means that whilst Roess may remain unscathed (although that would be more good luck than good management), sadly another child might not be as fortunate. What would she do if one of her fans copied her and then their child got hurt? How would she feel? Or would she as I suspect not give a
tit apart from the glib platitudes I’m sure she’d spout. The woman is an utter disgrace and given all the other risks she seems intent on putting in her children’s way I fear it may not be long before they come to haunt her. So she can pettily call us names and write as many snide, bitchy disclaimers as she likes but she can’t say we didn’t warn her. I just truly hope we aren’t right, for her sake and also for anyone who has witnessed her twattish antics and decided to copy her. She really is a thoughtless, selfish cretin.