Sensational Seven #3 Ten, corrected

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
1
Loveitme said:
Came here to say the same thing ! My boy is 1 second week of august .6 weeks time takes you to the 16th of august and she was due considerably earlier than me because I can remember her going on about it so much .What’s her obsession with them being small and early ?They we’re barely prem! Hence why they were average sized babies for twins !
Click to expand...
Shouldn’t she be happy she has 2 full size healthy babies. The obsession. Over having 2 small sickly babies is odd
 
Coffee-Addict said:
Did anyone notice her slip up!?

“Erm the boys was 6 weeks early well 4 but that depends “ and then she cut ot off 🤣🤣🤣🤣
Click to expand...
Is that not because twins usually only go to 38 weeks? So she means 6 weeks early to 40 weeks but 4 weeks early in twin terms?
That’s how I’ve taken that but not sure if that’s correct

I’m sure they were born at 34 weeks that’s what her post says when they were born
 
noseymama1234 said:
Is that not because twins usually only go to 38 weeks? So she means 6 weeks early to 40 weeks but 4 weeks early in twin terms?
That’s how I’ve taken that but not sure if that’s correct

I’m sure they were born at 34 weeks that’s what her post says when they were born
Click to expand...
So full term for her twins would be 37/38 weeks (non id separate sac and placenta I believe). They aim to deliver/induce in the 37th week. I have the same type of twins. I don’t “correct” their age despite being born just before 37weeks. Because you wouldn’t correct the age of a single baby born around that time?

Anyhow a year later and I still can’t get over Arhlo. Why the H????
 
Dipdab said:
So full term for her twins would be 37/38 weeks (non id separate sac and placenta I believe). They aim to deliver/induce in the 37th week. I have the same type of twins. I don’t “correct” their age despite being born just before 37weeks. Because you wouldn’t correct the age of a single baby born around that time?

Anyhow a year later and I still can’t get over Arhlo. Why the H????
Click to expand...
Yeh the H in Arhlo is unnecessary and i don’t think I’ll ever get over August as a name either tbh..
 
Dipdab said:
So full term for her twins would be 37/38 weeks (non id separate sac and placenta I believe). They aim to deliver/induce in the 37th week. I have the same type of twins. I don’t “correct” their age despite being born just before 37weeks. Because you wouldn’t correct the age of a single baby born around that time?

Anyhow a year later and I still can’t get over Arhlo. Why the H????
Click to expand...
Exactly - why are they always ‘corrected’ I’ve never heard anyone say the about a premature baby before… mine was 1 week late, do I need to start telling people that when they ask her age 🙄🙄
 
noseymama1234 said:
Is that not because twins usually only go to 38 weeks? So she means 6 weeks early to 40 weeks but 4 weeks early in twin terms?
That’s how I’ve taken that but not sure if that’s correct

I’m sure they were born at 34 weeks that’s what her post says when they were born
Click to expand...
Twins go to 37 weeks - but the weight of the twins is a massive factor in relation too , as she says “ very early babies “ .
She has done this time and time again making things up for content
 
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Back
Top