Wibblewobble has shared the text between Sharryn & Chris
care to explain????
So much drama!!!!!!
Let's also remember a child is involved here ❤❤❤
Well I guess if she’s not actually really calling them…She needs to be careful the police might black list her too
omg
She tries to fool her new followers.
I literally have no idea. I came away from the live feeling as though I had about 80% fewer brain cells than before
Said she was 2 faced,slagging her off to Nicky
I was thinking that,her association with Fontain looks so forced now,all the back up messages.
It’s like a brainwashed “cult” where they have to chant their love for their leader
I can just see her at the back of the class, with her hand held high , hopping from one leg to the other “please Shazza can I be your special person the one that spies on them Tattle People, I promise I’ll do it 100 times a day for you “SP really is a picnic short of a sandwich. Does she really not see how desperate she is to please Sasha? It’s uncomfortable to watch.
when she said in response to someone, why keep looking on there, she has to look on tattle it’s important, I nearly choked on my glass of red
Was like a toddler when you give them a special task to do.
I literally have no idea. I came away from the live feeling as though I had about 80% fewer brain cells than before
it was hilariousI know it’s pathetic she ain’t even met the dollop so why do it’s dirty work like bloody school kids the other joke niki barrelcakes turnout neither have really said nothing on social media dollop screaming they’ve plastered it all over tictok few posts on Niki account that she’s now deleted saying barrelcakes blocked and tattlers your right about herIt’s like a brainwashed “cult” where they have to chant their love for their leader
I can just see her at the back of the class, with her hand held high , hopping from one leg to the other “please Shazza can I be your special person the one that spies on them Tattle People, I promise I’ll do it 100 times a day for you “
He doesn’t have tunnel vision- he is just dim and doesn’t understand
Now stop it @Smithy883 you know SF will have no idea what non molestation order will mean! Ask google will be on top for her again this morning
I'm not sure I'd be making threats to ex
♂ again
will not attend millionaire's row due to time wasting 
(@nottobeforgotten) I’m sure @sofasloth01 will keep you entertained 
She was “allegedly” told by the boys in blue to stay off tattle, then came the bizarre announcement that they had “blocked” her computer from accessing it… 2mins later she’s reading the threads and being prompted by the fringe of dreams, “yeah refresh it,”
I’m out today, A day in London with my hubby, No ice cream in bed for us. We shall be dining at The Ritz… Don’t be jealous Tash
See you later Dave, I’ll drop wine in on the way
..could be Kev in his cop fancy dress..make sure to check ID ladies .crime number too..you can't be too sure
well after a busy day out yesterday with the chap and being wined n dined in the sunshine it's a day on the terrace for me in the sun .. give my tan a start before I take off next week for a couple of weeks to kick the years holidays off ..how about you Sharon..just another day in your flat staring at a screen and ranting and screeching we are all liars and shitcnuts? Have a lovely day everyone . Even you Snatcha fans
but not from what is being spoken about on here. Her 101 call yesterday was fueled by an ex who she claims should be keeping away from her (no evidence he has even been near her?), and it's pretty obvious any past 101 calls have got nowhere given she was moaning yesterday that the police are a waste of time. There was then the writing down names (user names and guessing who people are behind accounts), which she read out in public, of people on here who she claimed she was going to get arrested. 10 people from memory. Very silly/embarrassing move as law doesn't work like that. Example, are you in danger because someone on Tattle wrote you are pretending to be sick? Errmm no.
This sums her up perfectly. The frustration of the police being non committal is showing because they too can see she's got a history of playing the victim.A friend asked me why I'm invested in this person given I don't know her personally, and my simple answer was that there is a huge issue with creators/vloggers on social media that is being overlooked - as in they are sharing their personal lives on social media and getting away with claiming to be a victim when they are called out about their bad behaviour. I'm already doing a report on underage gifting on Tiktok, and think I've got my topic now for the next one.
I can only go on what I see directly, on videos and live streaming, and what I've seen is enough to convince me that people like her should not be able to get away with what they are doing. It's a different form of trolling, which they are doing themselves and could lead to serious consequences. Even if she is trying to take the route of a cyber bullying claim there just isn't any case because their first question would be to ask why is it happening. She may claim she doesn't know but it's pretty evident people are reacting to bad public behaviour, or are ex-friends who have been hurt by her.
Ps. My guess is she was on the phone to a solicitor the other day and she's trying to go down a libelous route. The Met would investigate direct harassment, which may be happening
She claims this is the same as what happened with evil queen but it's far from it. That crime was personal attack/vandalism and transphobia. She claims people are scared of her or won't prove she is lying, but 1) She blocks people who question her to avoid public debate and 2) threatens to 'batter' people who come to her door.
You can't claim bullying because you're reading about yourself on another site (give over pretending the police told you to keep off here when we all know it can be read without an account), when you can simply just keep away from it. It's just gossip, and if none of it was true there wouldn't be such a desperation to respond to it, which unfortunately for her just results in her getting stuck in a web of lies which leads to ammunition to keep on talking about her. She has already claimed it is helping her career being talked about anyway, so what harm is coming to her? She also needs to stop saying this has been going on for 10mths when a thread was started about her on the 9th December, and has just been discussion relating to what she is putting out there in the public domain. It's just one lie after another after another, sigh.
Anyway, given she claims the police/cyber crime are reading everything on this site then all this is for their benefit, so apologies for the essay. There has to be recognition that those who put their lives on social media can't just cry victim if disagreed with or called out for bad online behaviour, and can't get away with abusing and bullying themselves. I've seen verbal abuse (direct and indirect), doxing, potential charity fraud, illegal online selling, foul language and even pornographic content from this woman, on tiktok which is supposed to be a family app for fun. She mostly posts complaining videos, gauges a reaction for sympathy and anger based on no real facts, and then deletes the videos. However they are not deleted from Tiktok's server so the police could get to see them if they wanted to/had the time to see the bigger picture to understand the motives.
None of this should be happening anyway, social media should be fun, but for the sake of protecting the people on here it has to be made clear that there is motive of a serious nature, aside from the inevitable gossiping which happens with anyone in the public eye.