Sarah’s Day #75 extensions dishevelled, her body a vessel, rude to followers but what’s new for Sessel?

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
1
Why'd she only take half her rings off 😂
Screenshot_20240614_134632_Instagram.jpg

Screenshot_20240614_134636_Instagram.jpg
 
Norqs said:
She got pregnant the next cycle after her January period, so technically she got pregnant around 30th Jan, but Svessel will definitely say Feb if the name has Valentine in it somewhere! It was meant to be!!
Due date is 22nd October
Click to expand...

Ah thanks so maybe she will sneaky some Valentine / Vally action in there then.
---
Spanner14 said:
Why'd she only take half her rings off 😂
View attachment 2993814 q
View attachment 2993815 q
Click to expand...

Because she can’t get them off her fingers haha. She was going on about how skinny her little tiny bird hands are when she isn’t pregnant so her wedding rings slip around when she isn’t pregnant, but fit her great when she is PREGGY. The other ones she can’t get off though lol.
 
If I were Kurt I'd be booking a vasectomy ASAP. The way she keeps saying it's the last 'planned' baby is super weird. Like, it's a given that if they are both still fertile there is a non-zero chance (depending on contraception etc) of another, but for her to say it out loud definitely makes me think she's hoping for it/might try to engineer it. Can you imagine a 4th baby, the 'oopsie' and it's another boy 😂
 
La_Pina_Collab_Copycat said:
According to Statistics Queen Svessel, with each baby she has, the higher likelihood of having a boy. Love the irony that she’s the rule and not the exception. You’re not special Svessel 😂
Click to expand...
Where did Svessel get that 70% statistic from anyway?? I can't find it online anywhere except for people debunking it as an old wives tale 😅 I feel like she heard it somewhere and held on to it to soften the blow of finding out it was a boy... Like it was inevitable and she's not just unlucky.
 
sarahslongday said:
She says in her latest reel that her and Kurt always knew they’d call their first son Fox. Correct me if I’m wrong, but I thought she said Fox’s name came to her in a dream? Or was that just his middle name
Click to expand...
The middle name. I remember she had a different middle name planned when pregnant with fox but had a dream his name was fox ocean so changed it
 
La_Pina_Collab_Copycat said:
According to Statistics Queen Svessel, with each baby she has, the higher likelihood of having a boy. Love the irony that she’s the rule and not the exception. You’re not special Svessel 😂
Click to expand...
This is actually just 1000% inaccurate. And the comments about her ph and his sperm being more likely to create male babies is just also based in absolutely zero scientific fact and is not evidence based at all.

Not that she has ever cared about anything being evidence based. We all know her “research” involves a Google search and cherry-picking whatever she can find that suits her agenda.
 
GuiltySnarker said:
If I were Kurt I'd be booking a vasectomy ASAP. The way she keeps saying it's the last 'planned' baby is super weird. Like, it's a given that if they are both still fertile there is a non-zero chance (depending on contraception etc) of another, but for her to say it out loud definitely makes me think she's hoping for it/might try to engineer it. Can you imagine a 4th baby, the 'oopsie' and it's another boy 😂
Click to expand...

According to Sarah on the Sleep Deprived podcast Kurt won't touch her again after this pregnancy and if she wants a 4th baby it won't be with him 🤣

I do expect her to sneakily try for a 4th though. There's no way she won't. She wants a girl too much not to try again. Kurt should seriously consider the snip.
 

Attachments

  • ZomboDroid_15062024062747.jpg
    ZomboDroid_15062024062747.jpg
    63.1 KB · Views: 27
I will say that all my midwives said the same thing about me being statistically much more likely to have a third boy. But I don’t think it’s actually based on there being a scientific reason but simply the figures of what combos of kids people have. So whether it’s accurate or not it’s definitely a thing even medically trained people are saying.
 
kmartplate said:
I will say that all my midwives said the same thing about me being statistically much more likely to have a third boy. But I don’t think it’s actually based on there being a scientific reason but simply the figures of what combos of kids people have. So whether it’s accurate or not it’s definitely a thing even medically trained people are saying.
Click to expand...
Evidence based research and statistical probability are very different things. Probably a bit hard for Sez to comprehend
 
Wow, a boy, I'm so surprised...pause...NOOOOOT!

My 3yo at the time cried when we did a gender reveal, not because he was getting a brother but because his big sister popped the balloon before he did haha

I've always been a bit blunt in how I feel about gender disappointment, all I've ever cared about is having healthy babies (although apparently we aren't allowed to say this anymore either...) but I do respect that everyone is entitled to their own feelings. What is actually worse than being disappointed with whatever sexual organs your child is born with, is pretending that you aren't! Just say that you're sad it's not a girl. Or stop bloody harping on about how you always knew. Or maybe just STFU altogether.
 
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Back
Top