Sarahs Day #50 Malachi has arrived, DJ Sezbot has survived, Doing squats already, Get rid of this belly!

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
1
WhiteFox said:
So the question is.....how many tries to get the perfect Instagram shot?

And how orange will this baby be? Do you guys remember Fox arrived pre tanned? Obviously his hands stayed white.View attachment 1131693 q
Click to expand...
My reply disappeared so sorry if it reappears 😂
But wow is that an orange baby. Orange head and grey little hands 😬 why would you put a tan filter on your baby 😂
 
For once I actually thought that Sarah was kinda warranted to call that woman out on her tit tbh. And I'm surprised and impressed at her honesty around doing it. Yes the new baby is a cash cow! I want to get a good photo first! Fine, her choice (not that I agree with it).

Let me say first that what she did to Sabi & Soul was absolutely out of line and she should have taken responsibility for her actions, and same with others that she's doxxed in the past. Whether the message was textbook hate crime or not, the message was despicable and not even true by the sounds of it 🤷‍♀️ the woman who sent Sarah that message directly shouldn't have done it. Also - IT? Money Ka$h isn't an it. It's a boy. We know this. The woman's message kinda insinuated to me that it's an it because they think the baby has DS. Doesn't make the baby any less of a baby. Does she think this about other patients she works with that have extra needs?

If someone wrote racist tit online targeted at someone under their own name, they'd get doxxed for it. Why should it be any different because Sarah is a(n admittedly crappy human) public figure? Sarah is a POS but I would never dream of messaging that to someone. I doubt that woman would have ever said something like that to Sarah's face, so why send the message?

The woman is prob going to get trashed now because of crazy Stans, which I don’t agree with. I do believe in being responsible for your own actions tho.
peridoe said:
Bit late to the DM party but I agree with what others have said. That DM was out of line and frankly disgusting and should not have been sent.

That being said, I also hate doxxing and Sarah is also out of line for doing that. Because let's be honest, if it had been a troll account she wouldn't have bothered. She only shared that message because it was an actual account. Her intention was to doxx, no two ways about it.

While the message was callous and rude, she doesn't deserve Sarah's stans going after her. We know what extremes they can go to. Sarah said this person was a nurse so it probably wouldn't be too hard to find where she works. This person could end up harrassed or in trouble with her job just for sending a rude message to someone online. It's not even a hate message (in the actual definition), it was just uneducated and rude. She doesn't deserve the potential IRL backlash from it. If it had been actual hate (ie; racial, homophobic etc) then yes, call her out because that's a totally different ball game.
Click to expand...
 
Ok, there is no defence for that person sending Sarah that dm. I don't know what that person was even thinking to send that to anyone.
I thought it was pretty peak Sarah to say that she felt comfortable posting it tho because that person obviously stands by their words if they sent it to her. Hmmm so Sarah when you delete follower's comments about your ebook or just not address it, is that you standing by your words? If you put it out there, you obviously believe it so should't you accept whatever reaction you receive?

Also, I feel like the vibe people are getting from her stories is that the fun part is over for Sarah now. While she was pregnant, it was all about her. Her body, her wants/needs, her her her. Now, tit is real and it's not about her anymore. She realizes that she has to go home and take a back seat to her new baby and that tornado of a child 🦊 . I am being very sarcastic when I say that about him because I don't think he is any different than most kids his age. Unfortunately tho, he is surrounded by a group of Sarah enablers so that will definitely have an impact on his behaviours. Also, if he's had a temp for weeks then he was sick when Beth and Brenton brought their days old baby over.
 
AgatheC said:
The DM was out of line, yes. But blasting this person's username is even worse than the message itself in my opinion.
The Sez loves to talk about accountability and then shares a non public person's personal info to 1 million crazy stans who will no doubt bully this girl until she shuts down all her socials. It's disgusting.
Click to expand...
I agree, I think sending a DM using an account with your real name is already taking accountability for your words, it's as close as you can get to a face-to-face comment in the online world.

That being said, it's naive to think that a DM will stay private between you and that person. And while I understand why she was hurt, I think publishing her account name was unnecessary, especially if you're trying to position yourself as the bigger person.
 
android_x said:
It’s several pages back now, but I agree with the commenter who said something felt off about Sarah’s most recent stories. And not just like her normal manic overposting or whatever. Her eyes were all over the place, she was struggling to think of her next words, and she had that inappropriate (for the context) smile plastered on her face once she started getting really confrontational. Her word choice was also weird at times. Like not her normal vocabulary.

It was also weird to me that she’d sandwich that call out between an update about everyone being so sick and her announcement that she can finally go home. It was an inappropriate DM for sure. (And completely gross that the woman called the baby “it” while shitting on Sarah for hiding his face.) I can’t say that it was offensive enough for her to have to address it IMMEDIATELY, though. I imagine she gets far worse and more hurtful comments on the daily. Why did this one rattle her so much? I know she’s the distraction and misdirection Queen but it was all so damn awkward/disjointed that I believe it when she said it really hurt her.

And, no, I don’t think bubs has Down Syndrome. That’s not what I’m playing at here. I’m genuinely wondering what else is going on that made Sarah so sensitive that this was the DM that made her unravel. Especially when she had so much other content to lean on if she was only hoping to bury her eBook response.
Click to expand...

Just wanted to mention that in some languages it’s normal to use „it“ as a pronoun for a baby. Maybe the girl is just not a native English speaker and didn’t mean for it to sound rude. Although obviously the main message was very rude.
 
lbwadoam said:
Just wanted to mention that in some languages it’s normal to use „it“ as a pronoun for a baby. Maybe the girl is just not a native English speaker and didn’t mean for it to sound rude. Although obviously the main message was very rude.
Click to expand...
Fair enough, but her bio says she's a nurse in South Australia, so I think she MUST know that in English we use she/he. "It" isn't even gender-neutral, it's always non-human/inanimate.
 
allthetime123 said:
If someone wrote racist tit online targeted at someone under their own name, they'd get doxxed for it. Why should it be any different because Sarah is a(n admittedly crappy human) public figure?
Click to expand...

Agreed, if someone sends racist abuse online they deserve to be outed for it and banned from social media platforms. The message sent to Sarah wasn't, though. Although it was disgusting it wasn't bad in the grand scheme of things. The woman just accused Sarah of being ashamed of her baby because they think he has DS due to Sarah hiding his face. While it was extremely poorly worded it's no different to what has been posted on here in the last few days. Do we deserve to be doxxed for the things we post? I don't believe so. There is a difference though. We post on a forum where Sarah has the choice of whether to read our posts or not, instead of dm'ing her directly so she has no choice but to read them.

Sarah was right to show the message. Her followers need to know sending those kinds of messages is not ok and can hurt people, even if, in this case, that hurt was fake. But she should not have doxxed the woman's full name, profile picture, location (if it was on her profile) and her job with the intention of inflicting second hand abuse on that person. Not to mention if her stans managed to check her follower list and posts for ID clues before she deleted her account. This is just my opinion, it's cool if others disagree.

I will also say that what Sarah did to Sabi & Soul was way worse. Sarah accused that woman of being a scammer and a thief. Those words caused this woman to lose her business. Sarah was proved wrong but she refused to apologise. The difference between Sarah and the nurse is that Sarah's large following and platform shielded her from backlash. There's nothing stopping the more obsessive stans from harrassing this woman or contacting her family and employer. They've done it before.

And to run the risk of victim blaming this might not have happenef if Sarah hadn't spent three days hiding the baby's face and baited problems with his health. She brought that on herself. And if she didn't want people speculating his health condition she shouldn't have said a word about it in the first place. But Sarah is calculated. She knew what she was unleashing and probably jumped at the chance to share a "hate" message she knew she'd inevitably get.

I hope this doesn't start doxxgate. We're all going to have a different opinion on it. At the end of the day what that woman did was wrong. What Sarah did was also wrong.
 
Finethx4asking said:
I agree, I think sending a DM using an account with your real name is already taking accountability for your words, it's as close as you can get to a face-to-face comment in the online world.

That being said, it's naive to think that a DM will stay private between you and that person. And while I understand why she was hurt, I think publishing her account name was unnecessary, especially if you're trying to position yourself as the bigger person.
Click to expand...


But she's a smol human
 
Until I find my proper screenshot, ad standards are fucked. She lied, from memory, her audience is right up there for 18-24 year olds. Can I send it to ad standards for a proper investigation? This witch cannot get away with her ED book.

omg my free trial ended, I need to find a work email! Brb
 
Last edited:
rulebreaker101 said:
What’s that program called where we can see % of fake followers? Because from memory, we can see their insights. Ages of their followers etc etc...
Click to expand...
My free trial is up soon but here ya go 😂
Screenshot_20220317-203616_Chrome.jpg
Screenshot_20220317-203623_Chrome.jpg

Sadly she's also made it to 1.3M followers 😬 that baby is making the $$$ already 🤢
 
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Back
Top