melfish
VIP Member
That overwrought phrasing still makes me cringeWell, women are the worst you know. Teachers of children among them!
(I still chuckle about that).
That overwrought phrasing still makes me cringeWell, women are the worst you know. Teachers of children among them!
(I still chuckle about that).
It always reminds me of Yoda.That overwrought phrasing still makes me cringe
It's such an affectationIt always reminds me of Yoda.
That was the same for me as the comments a couple of times about 'nasty' supermarket perfumes and toiletries. Honestly we all know other perfumes are probably far better. We aren't daft. But I don't think attempts to look after yourself, laughable and nasty they may be, should be judged. If you are on a tight budget it is so bloody easy to let your appearance slide for any number of reasons, MH also playing a part in the spiral. I don't think there should be any judgment or hierarchy on what you can and cannot afford.I’m such a skid mark I don’t even hear my plates.
The microwave thing irked me the same way the latest gel polish piece did. How she told people to walk out of places that use the electric file or metal scraper.
these places are usually helmed by immigrants. They’re usually cheaper. When you’re getting press treatments a £40 gel manicuremight not seem like much. But I can get a full set of acylics for less in a shopping centre nail bar. Lots of people like to have nice nails but can’t afford not to go to places that use these tools.
The tone as usual was snippy and snooty.
no idea why that column in particular really annoyed me. Funny what gets under your skin.
I think it irritated someone at the guardian too, as shortly after there was an article about the role nail bars play in human trafficking...no idea why that column in particular really annoyed me. Funny what gets under your skin.
Oh, you mean the sort of story an actual journalist would write?I think it irritated someone at the guardian too, as shortly after there was an article about the role nail bars play in human trafficking...
Has SH ever (as far as we know) tackled a story about the murkier side of the beauty business?Oh, you mean the sort of story an actual journalist would write?
The only one that springs to mind is the article she did on PPD which she said on GTL was cut after being legalled.Has SH ever (as far as we know) tackled a story about the murkier side of the beauty business?
CH sometimes obliquely refers to things with a 'oh the stories I could tell' kind of vague post.
The sort of article an actual beauty editor would commission....oopOh, you mean the sort of story an actual journalist would write?
You mean writing about something that affects her directly? As opposed to what she usually does.The only one that springs to mind is the article she did on PPD which she said on GTL was cut after being legalled.
Has SH ever (as far as we know) tackled a story about the murkier side of the beauty business?
CH sometimes obliquely refers to things with a 'oh the stories I could tell' kind of vague post.
Is it worse than having a lipstick named after Susan Sarandon?a range called Cougar or something like that
And bravely doing a selfie even though she is always 'horrified' by doing one. 100% influencer.wouldn’t that require talent and impartiality? Not her bag, full blown influencer now isn’t she. Latest vanity post proves the point. Not paid etc etc so why tag it all out? ”look at me Pat, buying your lipstick with my own money”
Irony is obviously not in their vocabulary.