It really was shoehorned in. The silly joking about SH fancying GC wasn't anything to do with GC having a sock account.
But SH's clumsy segue gives me an idea for my own clumsy segue. Talk of the one year anniversary of GC's sock being exposed reminds of another anniversary which had quite slipped my mind.
It's 10 years since the Christmas period of 2009. What was significant about that Christmas? Saintly Hughes spent Christmastide 2009 slagging off an easily identifiable private individual for shits, giggles, follows and retweets. Only replies and manual RTs remain, of course. But the amount of these strongly suggest that SH spent A LOT of that Christmas on Twitter taking the piss out of the individual who is very much not a public figure. On a forum her sons and sons' friends could read as well (one if the criticisms she made about us posting here). Not at the time of course, they would have been too young, but now or in the future. It seems like Sali really didn't think it through when she was trashing (and I would suggest making stuff up about) this person for attention. Did SH really try and posit herself as some sort of guide and arbiter of modern manners in her Pool columns?