Roadside Mum #6 It is immoral to charge me for my own victimisation

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
1
CabalofBolorneaise said:
This depends on the bank I think. But presuming her PayPal is connected to her bank account, she absolutely knows deliveroo etc use PayPal and if she was that desperate for a supermarket she could always buy a e-voucher from the various places using her PayPal then use that to check out. So she’s deffo on the beg again.
Click to expand...


In March she was bitching about her card not working and Natwest were involved by DM. Mr D has a Natwest account.
 
She is no doubt volcanic with jealousy and rage every time someone gets some traction or engagement on HER picture (TM). She was so very very ill a couple of days ago that she could barely function. Stil raged about this though. And again.

Still, at least she has the kids to take her rage out on. 😞
 

Attachments

  • IMG_8238.jpeg
    IMG_8238.jpeg
    67.7 KB · Views: 68
  • IMG_8237.jpeg
    IMG_8237.jpeg
    54.4 KB · Views: 61
Christ - is she still pretending she is working class? With her Tory granddaddy reading FT articles to her, and her hippy chick New Age traveller with a small T lifestyle, and her overly wordy, faux academic gobshiteyness and pretend multilingual skills?

She is about as working class as Jack Monroe. She also has the biggest, most furiously bitter chip on her shoulder - she WISHES she was working class because then she could blame her current position in this sort of rambling nonsense.

BTW RSM - the vast majority, if not all of the working class people I know live in a spotless house and their kids tend to have manners. Not like your gobby offspring, and self described pit of filth.

Yours, a daughter of a steelworker and a jackofallmannerofmenialtrades mum.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_8247.jpeg
    IMG_8247.jpeg
    60 KB · Views: 53
Thread title!

"... it's self declared."
---
Shimmering said:
Worked out well for Rachel Dolezal.

I hope the same for RSM and her "self declared" race/ethnicity.
Click to expand...
In Aus, self declared is important for people who are Aboriginal and or Torres Strait Islander.

The self declaration includes:
Screenshot_20230821_094101_Chrome.jpg


It's not the same as class.

Regardless of her class, Roadsidemum has no class.
 
Last edited:
Gosh - who would have imagined? Another episode of debilitation as she has a “work” meeting.

Funny how these episodes don’t strike when they are gallivanting around portions of the NC500.

How are Unbound still putting up with this….well over £20k of pledged money for this?

And HOW is RSM getting away with this nonsense whenever she has to either provide a modicum of planned parenting or meet a commitment that is classed as “work”?
 

Attachments

  • IMG_8249.jpeg
    IMG_8249.jpeg
    78.9 KB · Views: 50
For anyone relatively new - this project started in January 2022 - pre Russia attack, and pre cost of living crisis.

You were promised £250 if you succeeded in making a submission about your current state of poverty. You HAD to be poor to be in it.

There have been many excuses and a memorable rant at some poor sod called Mason - that must have taken SO much energy from someone suffering so much for their art.

The book is still missing in action. It’s also largely irrelevant and out of date now. And no one has received a penny for their submission. Holidays/Xmas and no doubt crises by the dozen will have rolled on and away from those people that probability traumatised and triggered themselves for the hope of £250.

Some classic screenies for posterity.

Roadside mum aka Louise Britain aka who the duck knows, and Unbound are ghouls.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_8249.jpeg
    IMG_8249.jpeg
    78.9 KB · Views: 45
  • IMG_8250.jpeg
    IMG_8250.jpeg
    53.9 KB · Views: 45
  • IMG_8251.jpeg
    IMG_8251.jpeg
    84.7 KB · Views: 62
  • IMG_8252.jpeg
    IMG_8252.jpeg
    85.7 KB · Views: 45
  • IMG_8253.jpeg
    IMG_8253.jpeg
    61.7 KB · Views: 42
CabalofBolorneaise said:
Why do they have to be on packed lunch for a short while? Even if whatever the Scottish equivalent of the FSM system is still processing her application, if she went to the school (including by phone RSM if you can’t get up there) and explained the situation I bet they’d be able to allow the kids to have school meals.
Click to expand...

Exactly. She's just drama farming for attention. Hopefully it's all lies.

Aren't they old enough to walk or cycle to school (with their new bikes and kit she bought them) anyway given that she's in such a bad way she can't manage the school run?

Or call a taxi to take them all with some of the cash she has from the back payment? Or has that all been blown on shite?

She's pissed me off with this one. The kids don't deserve this. She is the one who uprooted them. And she can't even manage to get them in to school on time. And live tweets the whole thing for clout.

She's an utter twit of a person.
 
Shimmering said:
Exactly. She's just drama farming for attention. Hopefully it's all lies.

Aren't they old enough to walk or cycle to school (with their new bikes and kit she bought them) anyway given that she's in such a bad way she can't manage the school run?

Or call a taxi to take them all with some of the cash she has from the back payment? Or has that all been blown on shite?

She's pissed me off with this one. The kids don't deserve this. She is the one who uprooted them. And she can't even manage to get them in to school on time. And live tweets the whole thing for clout.

She's an utter twit of a person.
Click to expand...

I bet she’s gearing up for a “they wouldn’t feed my kids” claim.

I don’t know how the system works in Scotland but assuming it’s got similarities with the English one for FSM, we had kids move into area and be applying for them all the time and they’d be allowed meals if the parents asked and told us (obviously we were not psychic if they came with a normal looking pack up and didn’t mention anything) - it always evened out with the kids who were entitled but chose to bring a pack up which I imagine is even more common for kids to do at high school than it is in primary and unless it was a very popular meal day there were inevitably left overs anyway. She literally creates problems.

(RSM if you’re going to claim that the kitchen is broken or something, you realise they still have to make provision for kids entitled to free meals right? They can’t just go “duck you” unless maybe you’ve sent them to a private school…)
 
Shimmering said:
Exactly. She's just drama farming for attention. Hopefully it's all lies.

Aren't they old enough to walk or cycle to school (with their new bikes and kit she bought them) anyway given that she's in such a bad way she can't manage the school run?

Or call a taxi to take them all with some of the cash she has from the back payment? Or has that all been blown on shite?

She's pissed me off with this one. The kids don't deserve this. She is the one who uprooted them. And she can't even manage to get them in to school on time. And live tweets the whole thing for clout.

She's an utter twit of a person.
Click to expand...
I know 😕 I can't remember if the children were at school last term - but even so they are still very new and finding their feet in a new school in a new location.
Trust RSM to make them stand out by being late. Why didn't she get their sandwiches ready last night? She knew she had a really busy day today.
But yes plenty of time to write long tweets about it all.
 
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Back
Top