Roadside Mum #6 It is immoral to charge me for my own victimisation

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
1
CabalofBolorneaise said:
She might slip under the radar, it’s harder because you need council permission to withdraw your children from school there but she won’t have to withdraw the krays if she never sends them to school…
Click to expand...
She can’t fly under the radar, social services and child services will be wise to this sort of thing. She needs a doctor so she’ll be registering herself, accompanied by one or both krays, surely.
 
HotesTilaire said:
She can’t fly under the radar, social services and child services will be wise to this sort of thing. She needs a doctor so she’ll be registering herself, accompanied by one or both krays, surely.
Click to expand...

I mean more for the homeschooling. It will be effectively the same as England if she doesn’t need permission to withdraw (which she won’t if she doesn’t enrol them in school, and she doesn’t have to do), the council/authority can and should check up on the education but it will depend on where she is, how on it they are, whether she and the krays can talk a good talk etc. Especially if she goes down the undiagnosed special needs route.
 
CabalofBolorneaise said:
I mean more for the homeschooling. It will be effectively the same as England if she doesn’t need permission to withdraw (which she won’t if she doesn’t enrol them in school, and she doesn’t have to do), the council/authority can and should check up on the education but it will depend on where she is, how on it they are, whether she and the krays can talk a good talk etc. Especially if she goes down the undiagnosed special needs route.
Click to expand...
Oh I agree, but Scotland must know parents exploit the council permission loophole. And it will be known that they’re new in town. She can’t totally hide them.
 
I’ve just seen this obviously I can’t speak for all Scottish schools but round here while blazers are in the list, many kids don’t wear them or it’s just any blazer from any shop if they do
IMG_1865.jpeg
 
alphaspagbol said:
I’ve just seen this obviously I can’t speak for all Scottish schools but round here while blazers are in the list, many kids don’t wear them or it’s just any blazer from any shop if they do View attachment 2146935 q
Click to expand...

Wait… a blazer for primary school is £85? RN is probably on the cusp of primary or secondary depending when her birthday is, but LO is firmly primary, especially in the Scottish system.
 
CabalofBolorneaise said:
Wait… a blazer for primary school? RN is probably on the cusp of primary or secondary depending when her birthday is, but LO is firmly primary, especially in the Scottish system.
Click to expand...
If she turned 11 before Feb 28 this year she’ll start secondary this August. The summer term here ends at the end of June so depending on when the move is they may just skip the end of the summer term
 
FrannyGallops said:
The wording on that tweet is odd…’£85 for one each’. Is that £85 for one blazer or for two for each of her kids? If it’s the latter, £42.50 for a blazer is pretty standard. It was £35 for a blazer when I was in school and that’s going back over 30 years now.
Click to expand...
Any amount will be a shock, as one of the kids doesn’t even have a school uniform at the moment
 
alphaspagbol said:
If she turned 11 before Feb 28 this year she’ll start secondary this August. The summer term here ends at the end of June so depending on when the move is they may just skip the end of the summer term
Click to expand...

Ah for some reason I thought she was 10! I think RSM has posted varying ages.

A lot of secondaries here have blazers too (very rarely primaries which I know is a difference) and the prices would be the same region presuming she actually means it’s £85 for both…
 
Yer_wha?! said:
No. It actually states on our polling cards in England that you don't need to take it to the polling station. I've never taken one once!
Click to expand...

She’s such an attention seeker. I’m surprised she’s not claiming she doesn’t have ID despite being a driver.

If she suspects she’s got a faulty socket that her toaster is plugged into, why on earth is she using the socket at all leaving it plugged in (presumably with switch on as well) overnight? She’s asking for a fire, this is Jack M level fire safety stupidity.
 
CabalofBolorneaise said:
I mean more for the homeschooling. It will be effectively the same as England if she doesn’t need permission to withdraw (which she won’t if she doesn’t enrol them in school, and she doesn’t have to do), the council/authority can and should check up on the education but it will depend on where she is, how on it they are, whether she and the krays can talk a good talk etc. Especially if she goes down the undiagnosed special needs route.
Click to expand...


The previous LA will act on it once they disappear, because the school has to notify them of EHE as well. If you actually read the CME (Children Missing From Education) policies for LAs (I don't expect anybody who doesn't literally do this sort of tit for a living to, but it completely contradicts the perception of EHE and moving = freedom from pesky child protection procedures), they all require schools to notify them of this before they have permission to remove them from their registers. As soon as this happens, the original CME team then get checking for the change of address and when it's found - which it will be, you don't get benefits including housing costs without evidencing a new address - they notify the new area which is, being Scotland, very, very thorough about these things. And that's before you add in the information provided with the risk assessments and potential SS involvement when this all gets put together.

Oh, and they'll contact RD as well. Best not to piss him off too much when you're already taking his children away from him, eh?
 
TheDragonWithAFlagon said:
The previous LA will act on it once they disappear, because the school has to notify them of EHE as well. If you actually read the CME (Children Missing From Education) policies for LAs (I don't expect anybody who doesn't literally do this sort of tit for a living to, but it completely contradicts the perception of EHE and moving = freedom from pesky child protection procedures), they all require schools to notify them of this before they have permission to remove them from their registers. As soon as this happens, the original CME team then get checking for the change of address and when it's found - which it will be, you don't get benefits including housing costs without evidencing a new address - they notify the new area which is, being Scotland, very, very thorough about these things. And that's before you add in the information provided with the risk assessments and potential SS involvement when this all gets put together.

Oh, and they'll contact RD as well. Best not to piss him off too much when you're already taking his children away from him, eh?
Click to expand...
See, I knew it wouldn’t be simple to just disappear
 
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Back
Top