Roadside Mum #6 It is immoral to charge me for my own victimisation

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
1
The move to Scotland may be in the offing! Will RN be allowed to attend school up there? Will LO be asked to rewrite the curriculum on Scottish history once those wild celts realise what a genius is in their midst? Will RSM be able to use her vague association with Catholicism as an identity for people to bash? What will become of RD who lives on the drive?
I cannae wait!
 
Why is she posting proudly about her LO making fun of a boy for having “long yellow nails with black spots”? If that’s true, then at their age, she’s mocking another child for being neglected by their parents. Charming, Louisa. What happens when the other kids turn round and mock LO for having to push you around? Or because they’re late because you struggled to get to school? It won’t be ok, will it? So why is it ok for your little Kray to mock another child for something they have no control over (and if his nails are yellow and black it could equally be due to a medical condition but the same applies, something not the boys fault in the slightest.)

Edited to not double post as I finally found the old thread: looks like UC rent in Scotland can go straight to the LL but it also seems like it would be RSMs choice. I know here if people were moved from HB to UC, they generally did the procedure to make sure the rent still went straight to the HA but perhaps different areas have different thresholds on whether they’ll allow that… or different advisors knowing the ones here!
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0584.png
    IMG_0584.png
    38.4 KB · Views: 107
Last edited:
Episode eleventythousand of “My child is so very VERY special - so I must also be, as their mother”. If the poor sod exists at all. I wonder if it’s the one she has decided is a lesbian? Or the one that is treated as an indentured dogsbody and coffee supplier.

Also - brownie points for “undiagnosed” conditions - holding out for a bit more disability benefit RSM? No wonder her and Bex are special friends.
 

Attachments

  • 31ECBECE-8F36-452F-A0B6-AE05038181BB.jpeg
    31ECBECE-8F36-452F-A0B6-AE05038181BB.jpeg
    60.1 KB · Views: 128
Episode eleventythousand of “My child is so very VERY special - so I must also be, as their mother”. If the poor sod exists at all. I wonder if it’s the one she has decided is a lesbian? Or the one that is treated as an indentured dogsbody and coffee supplier.

Also - brownie points for “undiagnosed” conditions - holding out for a bit more disability benefit RSM? No wonder her and Bex are special friends.
In short Louisa, no normal parent would need your input on anything related to parenting. Hth.
 
I think I’ve said this before but I absolutely 100% do not believe those children exist. Everything she writes about them (and herself) smacks of weird internet roleplaying. Through her fake kids she can ‘explore’ hundreds of different personalities - her fake eldest kid who is the most disabled by her epilepsy ever, but also out on the gay scene every night; her autistic historian savant LO; wisecracking, fighty RN. If she hadn’t done that radio interview with her ‘real’ voice I’d be convinced she was actually some weird basement dwelling man who gets off on pretending to be the most disabled ever but also a horny bisexual woman with a lesbian love internet. It sounds weird but I’ve seen people role playing as weirder tit online…
 
The only thing that makes me think she and the kids must exist in some form is that she did have real meetings with Chartwells after she first went viral. So presumably she would have had to provide details of the school RN/LO went to and I think if they were entirely fictional it would have fallen right down there.

I suspect the kids bear little resemblance to the ones she talks about online though.
 
Oh jeez. The illest ill person ever and her two children far away from their main support. I hope not.

She’s not directly said it so I’m hoping she’s just worded it badly, but that’s what it really sounds like to me.


I’m worried that the kids are real and she’s taking them rural to isolate them/hold them hostage

I think she’s trying to run from SS scrutiny. That’s why it had to be Scotland, she’s hoping switching countries will help.
 
I don’t think she’s moving there for the option of a free university education for the girls…
Im sure someone Scottish has told us on here that homeschooling doesn’t really fly there?

She might slip under the radar, it’s harder because you need council permission to withdraw your children from school there but she won’t have to withdraw the krays if she never sends them to school…
 
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Back
Top