Reann Jenkins

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
I for one am glad she’s directing people here so they can see absolutely NO ONE write a comment about her son dribbling. What a sick and twisted mind to dream that up.
I briefly described a really objectionable and invasive video she posted of him in his underwear. Objectionable because it strips him of all privacy and dignity and shouldn't be out there on an unlocked account (or at all imo) and apparently that's the problem rather than the video itself. She's trying to twist that into mockery when it absolutely wasn't any anyone mocking a disabled child would be rightly run off here.
---
She's absolutely through the looking glass and totally lying about what we do here, whipping herself into a frenzy over something that didn't happen.
 
Last edited:
All these grifters post the same tit in the same incoherent way, the stuff about I never read Tattle, I don't care, someone showed it to me once, is Sarah Jay verbatim. None of these dipshits have ever had an original thought, all the same high conflict, disageeable personalities, incapable of taking responsibility for their own behaviour and instead blaming the people who call them out on their crappy behaviour.

Stop exploiting your poor, innocent children online and we'll have nothing to talk about.
 
Nothing pleases me more than when this bunch see the begging drop off a cliff. Retweeted her beg again. After ranting about us (thanks for the traffic and showing your followers where to read about the real Reann) Last donation was 17 days ago. Peppering her rants with random stories of frustrated disabled people so she can pretend to be a “campaigner”. And no doubt planning her next gig (watch out Olly) and arcade visit with the £5k a month of handouts that apparently isn’t enough to cover her family needs.

Still - thumbs up to the fuzz. A nice little copy and paste reply every time she tags them.

There is limited scope for giving her credit due to trauma imo. If her childhood was so tough and supporting additional needs children so hard, why carry on having them one after another? And I am not for a second giving her the indulgence of mental health issues, she is just a very stupid gobshite. Anyone with a working class background that has or is living on council estates knows exactly the sort of family this is - could probably name a couple of likeminded families themselves. Never worked. Never WILL work. Breeds until they can’t and then the daughters take over. Sometimes supporting their benefits with illegal low level criminal activity - hates the coppers, screams discrimination when they turn up, until they are wronged then are on the phone constantly. Nearly always white and tout BNP/Yaxley-Lennon nonsense alongside homophobic and transphobic attitudes - because it’s NEVER their fault when their life is tit, always someone else, usually brown and/or educated and in positions of importance or doing the graft of ten because they are on minimum wage and have no recourse to public funds due to their immigrant status.

TL-DR - she isn’t in mental health crisis. She is just in unlikeable and stupid person. This is her day to day - we are just seeing more of it and having it directed to us instead of the other stuff she normally moans about.

Interesting about the child protection meetings. I wonder how many they've attended. Those poor, poor kids

Screenshot_20240926_123304_Samsung Internet.jpg
 
Interesting about the child protection meetings. I wonder how many they've attended. Those poor, poor kids

View attachment 3190457 q
Putting that incredibly personal info online and being mad when ppl have an opinion on it is willlllld. Likewise writing revenge porn about the ppl you believe have wronged you.

I know I'm into Sarah J/Colombo territory of just-1-more-thing now but I'm honestly swerving this thread now. For the kids sake only. They don't need this ranting delusional individual to have yet something else to distract her from their care.
 
Putting that incredibly personal info online and being mad when ppl have an opinion on it is willlllld. Likewise writing revenge porn about the ppl you believe have wronged you.

I know I'm into Sarah J/Colombo territory of just-1-more-thing now but I'm honestly swerving this thread now. For the kids sake only. They don't need this ranting delusional individual to have yet something else to distract her from their care.
All I’m hanging around for are the “screenshots”
 
I woke up today in a really good mood after a particularly delicious sleep, full of sunshine, rainbows and empathy. I really wanted to find some justification for her behaviours in my earlier comment.

But now I’ve just accidentally emptied Rice Krispies all over my floor, I’m back to thinking they’re cousins. Thick, aggressive, entitled, inbred-dregs-of-the-gene-pool slobs whose children deserve better. I’m relieved that child protection are keeping a close eye on them.
 
My nephew head bangs, he hand flaps, he dribbles, he often has unfocused eyes. Note how this is a description of certain aspects of his physicality and not mocking or mimicry. His mums videos and photos of him showing these characteristics stay private- not because there's anything 'shameful' about these attributes, not because disabled people should be hidden away but because he lacks the capacity to consent to these physical vulnerabilities being shared. Private, not secret.

PS, he is adorable. As is J.
 
My nephew head bangs, he hand flaps, he dribbles, he often has unfocused eyes. Note how this is a description of certain aspects of his physicality and not mocking or mimicry. His mums videos and photos of him showing these characteristics stay private- not because there's anything 'shameful' about these attributes, not because disabled people should be hidden away but because he lacks the capacity to consent to these physical vulnerabilities being shared. Private, not secret.

PS, he is adorable. As is J.
Do we think Reann was 'into children' and is now also that Tattle one?
It's disturbing stuff. Like really twisted.
Nobody will contribute to the wheelchair if they glance at her recent posts. Obsessing over a relatively obscure gossip forum and retweeting posts about sticking carrots up arses.

Oh Matt.

Screenshot_20240926_160009_Google.jpg
 
Do we think Reann was 'into children' and is now also that Tattle one?
It's disturbing stuff. Like really twisted.
Nobody will contribute to the wheelchair if they glance at her recent posts. Obsessing over a relatively obscure gossip forum and retweeting posts about sticking carrots up arses.

Oh Matt.

View attachment 3190747 q

Ironically, Reann and Ryan would have been excellent characters on Little Britain.
 
Posts that Tattle 'targets women' (it doesn't, there are numerous threads about men) when there have been at least two alts in the last week which posted delights such as:

Implying breast size is some sort of barometer for how attractive or worthy a woman is and repeatedly making reference to it.

Posting a meme about how women who post on here just need to learn how to give a hand job.

Inventing weird sexual tales about women.

Repeatedly posting images of a tent implying it resembles a vagina.

Referring to a woman in her 60's as a 'dried up old sprout'.
---
Definitely them. If it's not, surely they'd be following others with a thread on here such as Sare and Tanya?
They're only following kippers & 'patriots' like themselves.
Also, unfamiliar with the full stop and the indefinite article.
Could be Rebecca Vardy though 🤷‍♀️

This pretty much confirmed to me it's her or both of them.

Screenshot_20240926_183119_X.jpg
 
Definitely them. If it's not, surely they'd be following others with a thread on here such as Sare and Tanya?
They're only following kippers & 'patriots' like themselves.
Also, unfamiliar with the full stop and the indefinite article.
Could be Rebecca Vardy though 🤷‍♀️
I’d venture to say a couple of the people interacting with intokids and the tattle one are socks as well.

And the ones that are genuine….wow. The caliber of people that interact with them both certainly tells you a lot.
 
Posts that Tattle 'targets women' (it doesn't, there are numerous threads about men) when there have been at least two alts in the last week which posted delights such as:

Implying breast size is some sort of barometer for how attractive or worthy a woman is and repeatedly making reference to it.

Posting a meme about how women who post on here just need to learn how to give a hand job.

Inventing weird sexual tales about women.

Repeatedly posting images of a tent implying it resembles a vagina.

Referring to a woman in her 60's as a 'dried up old sprout'.
---


This pretty much confirmed to me it's her or both of them.

View attachment 3191031 q
All of the weird sexual stuff is Ryan. Personally I think someone able to make up stuff that weird should have their hard drive checked and not be allowed anywhere near kids but that’s just me.

I just can’t understand why they didn’t stick to the believable lies (like the like someone mocked her disabled child), ones that the thickos following them actually believe until they come here and see they made it all up.

All of the stuff about the messages that don’t exist will be easily found out and the weird sexual fantasies of Ryan’s that he keeps sharing and attributing to us are just making the account look like it’s run by a complete nutter.

EDIT: no wonder she dresses up like a clown, the circus is probably one of Ryan’s kinks.
 
Last edited:
She's a disgusting, attention seeking liar. As others have said - keep directing your followers over here, Reann

View attachment 3190819 q

How are these two issues related?

With every tweet she sounds thicker and more mental.

If you have a negative interaction with every organisation you come into contact with, you're the problem.

I deal with people like this all the time at work, who think I'm "biased" against them, when all I really would like to be able to do is give them the answer they want to hear so they'll duck off. But I can't, because they are almost always the architects of their own misfortune.
 
How are these two issues related?

With every tweet she sounds thicker and more mental.

If you have a negative interaction with every organisation you come into contact with, you're the problem.

I deal with people like this all the time at work, who think I'm "biased" against them, when all I really would like to be able to do is give them the answer they want to hear so they'll duck off. But I can't, because they are almost always the architects of their own misfortune.
It’s ok, she’s in for a rude awakening because she genuinely thinks the police are going to come knocking at all of our doors which has given me a good laugh this evening.
 
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Back
Top