Reann Jenkins #2 I'm just lurking for the droopy wabs tbh.

1
She/they really are more stupid than Sarah Vag! Which is saying something!

What’s up hun? Not keen on us pointing out that 8 tickets plus travel and food, tee shirts - and a new tube of pan stick, new Sharpie - to see Take That in the summer must have cost getting close to a grand and yet you want handouts from the kindhearted and gullible for disability aides you get thousands in benefits for?

How much cash have you put your hand in your pocket for, to take the fat lump and the kids to drool (you btw, not your disabled kid) over poor Olly?
 
VeniVidiVicki said:
It’s a hate crime to post about a multiple fundraisers apparently which would be taken v seriously by the police if Ryan n Reann were black.

View attachment 3199968 q

View attachment 3199973 q

You are absolutely free to speak up online Reann. As are the people who criticise you.

That is literally the meaning of free speech. It’s not free if it’s only the opinions you like to hear.
Click to expand...

"I have a disabled child therefore any criticism of me is a hate crime" is a bit of a stretch even for someone as thick as her.

She really should screenshot the awful things we've said about her disabled children and share them, shouldn't she.

But she can't, because it never happened.
 
Let me get this right - they post about their children publicly and don't expect comments? It's why I don't post on twitter under my real name which apparently means I've got something to hide? I'm the only person in the UK with my name.

Maybe they should get off the internet and actually get the help they say their children need

Maybe the police will be interested in Ryan threatening me on twitter last week and his mate implying I'm a pweirdo because I don't use my real name (which if you look closely, is on my twitter somewhere)
 
Melian said:
Let me get this right - they post about their children publicly and don't expect comments? It's why I don't post on twitter under my real name which apparently means I've got something to hide? I'm the only person in the UK with my name.

Maybe they should get off the internet and actually get the help they say their children need

Maybe the police will be interested in Ryan threatening me on twitter last week and his mate implying I'm a pweirdo because I don't use my real name (which if you look closely, is on my twitter somewhere)
Click to expand...

If your real name is on your twitter and you have engaged with them there you are giving them quite a lot of personal info. Please be careful. There’s a reason why crossing the streams is discouraged here.
 
Jelly Bean said:
Why don't either of them work? Have they actually given a reason why we pay to fund them and raise all their children?
And still the ungrateful twats moan about the unfairness of it all.
Click to expand...

When you've got nine kids, more than one of whom has complex additional needs, looking after them is a full time job.

The firstborn, A, was born with spina bifida. Depending on the severity of her condition (and from what Reann has said on her wide open socials, it's quite severe), I'd have probably stopped there, especially as, given her family history, and the fact that A has spina bifida, there's an increased risk that subsequent children would have it. However, they decided to keep rolling the dice and had more children. J was born with spina bifida and hydrocephalus. Then they had another one.

Even the most devout Catholic "children are a gift from God and we're not going to interfere" people I know (and I know a few, for reasons), would have stopped after J. If I were in their position, I would not have made the choices they have, and in this day and age, endlessly having kids is a choice. Even in Wales, there's free family planning. And yes, I know, accidents happen, but not that often.
 
- Especially - in Wales there's free family planning. There's loads more free NHS provision here than in England, in my experience.

But if you were a doctor advising this pair of fuckwits they might want to consider not having more kids it'd be a hate crime and abuse and probably race would be brought into it somewhere too. Bet they've been banned from half the GPs in Bridgend County.
 
My god, these people.

The only people you have ever helped is yourself. And that goes double for your mate that never shared evidence her begging supports anyone other than herself in her fancy kitchen and her own kid in his full Liverpool kit.

Another person that has realised people are inherently kind and will chip a few quid in when kids are used. And milked it for every single penny they can.

We don’t target you because you are a woman. We target you because you are a thief. Just like the Unbound enabled RsM (who was no stranger to a CashApp beg even when she was flying up and down the country for a shag). And Bex - who is currently doing exactly the same thing. The sooner you delete your account and stop stealing, the sooner we will stop highlighting your theft.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_2042.jpeg
    IMG_2042.jpeg
    68.6 KB · Views: 10
  • IMG_2043.jpeg
    IMG_2043.jpeg
    73.6 KB · Views: 12
The fact is that a lot of women who use Tattle have ND children or children with physical disabilities.
I have a physical disability myself and am ND. I'm also a feminist but also a realist, I don't support women who are actual arseholes just because they have the same XX chromosomes.

While I'm on my soapbox, my mum worked with children with disabilities, she sometimes would take my brothers and I to work for the day so we could hang out with her 'other kids.' We thought it was a fun day but it was also a life lesson.
Get off your high horse, Reann. You don't know us and you don't know our families or living situations.
 
Witchfinder Sargeant said:
When you've got nine kids, more than one of whom has complex additional needs, looking after them is a full time job.

The firstborn, A, was born with spina bifida. Depending on the severity of her condition (and from what Reann has said on her wide open socials, it's quite severe), I'd have probably stopped there, especially as, given her family history, and the fact that A has spina bifida, there's an increased risk that subsequent children would have it. However, they decided to keep rolling the dice and had more children. J was born with spina bifida and hydrocephalus. Then they had another one.

Even the most devout Catholic "children are a gift from God and we're not going to interfere" people I know (and I know a few, for reasons), would have stopped after J. If I were in their position, I would not have made the choices they have, and in this day and age, endlessly having kids is a choice. Even in Wales, there's free family planning. And yes, I know, accidents happen, but not that often.
Click to expand...

👏👏👏

She had at least 2 more after J. Another girl who was born 9 months after him (and is in his same school year) and then there was a boy who needed open heart surgery. There may have been another boy in the middle too.

She’s had 10 kids all in all, an older boy N followed by her girl A with spina bifida and then 8 more, including J with spina bifida, T with a heart condition, and multiple with alleged neurodevelopmental conditions. Is it any wonder A was taken away? She can’t have been meeting all of her complex additional needs with a brood that large.

He should have tied a knot in it years ago. Not because I don’t think disabled children are a blessing nor because I’m against big families, but because I believe children with complex needs deserve to have their needs met and not overshadowed by the needs of more and more (disabled) younger siblings. It’s bleeping irresponsible, verging on neglectful.

I stopped at two because my youngest is autistic. It wasn’t fair on them, or their older sibling, to spread myself any thinner. I agree caring for all of those kids is a full time job, they can’t possibly work as well, but when you choose to make breeding your career don’t expect the rest of the world to put their hand in their pocket to fund your lifestyle.
 
Last edited:
Exactly. We're not bullying diabled children, they are the victims in this situation. Victims of their parents horrible aggressive maladaptive behaviours. Yes it is a struggle to get everything you need for kids but popping off at everyone doesn't benefit you, nor does it benefit the people who come after you to have to deal with people who are ultimately trying to do their best for everyone with limited resources and who probably get very jaded after dealing with aggy bastards like this pair. It's not campaigning it's throwing a strop.
 
IMG_8959.jpeg


Let’s look a little closer at what Reann has posted here, rather ironically:

IMG_8960.jpeg


IN YELLOW, what she has done to the health board, IN GREEN what she continues to do to her children, and IN ORANGE exactly what we suspect she is doing with all these crowdfunds. All points yellow, green and orange are precisely why she has a thread here.


We’ve seen J’s wheelchair was fully funded + £50 through GoFundMe, we’ve seen he currently uses that one from the pictures on the crowdfund and him on her Twitter, we’re glad he got that.

But to be asking for separate PayPal donations, to the point GoFundMe puts an alert on the page to warn people that it’s iffy, is, well, umm, iffy.

IMG_8954.jpeg
IMG_8953.jpeg

£11,580 raised for a new wheelchair for J on 25 June 2023. Fab. 4 years have gone by, kids grow fast, their needs change, but wait… why is he still in the same one he got in 2019 then? Where’s that £11.5k gone?

IMG_8955.jpeg
IMG_8956.jpeg

And if they raised £11.5k for a wheelchair for him in 2023, why do they need another £15k for a wheelchair for him 15 months later? It seems… excessive, no? Are they hoping that people who don’t have experience with the cost of disability will just be too polite or naive to call them out?

IMG_8958.jpeg


And why does it coincide with the flop of their dubious £20k crowdfund earlier this year?

IMG_8957.jpeg

None of this is unfounded rumours, it’s interpretation of data that is laid bare in front of us that she doesn’t seem to be able to explain any other way. WHERE IS THAT £11.5K?

Oh. Still posting about her eldest daughter’s private and sensitive medical information related to her continence I see, freshly re-shared today. I hope her daughter or someone caring for her reports Reann for POINTS IN GREEN.
 
Last edited:
Fully 1/3 of my salary fucks off before I even see it to pay for people like Reann to pop sprogs out like she's got a clown car down there. When you add in the provision I'm sensibly making for my own retirement, it's over 40%. I do without so she can sit on socials screeching about being bullied and discriminated against and meanwhile there's talk of the single person council tax discount being abolished, in part because council social care bills are skyrocketing. Slow handclap for Reann and others of her ilk who've managed to make me resentful of the existence of the social safety net.
 
Witchfinder Sargeant said:
Slow handclap for Reann and others of her ilk who've managed to make me resentful of the existence of the social safety net.
Click to expand...

Dude I literally benefit from said social safety net and Reann & co even make me resentful of it.

ahkrin said:
It's not campaigning it's throwing a strop.
Click to expand...

Another premature thread title nomination btw.
 
FlashBoof said:
My god, these people.

The only people you have ever helped is yourself. And that goes double for your mate that never shared evidence her begging supports anyone other than herself in her fancy kitchen and her own kid in his full Liverpool kit.

Another person that has realised people are inherently kind and will chip a few quid in when kids are used. And milked it for every single penny they can.

We don’t target you because you are a woman. We target you because you are a thief. Just like the Unbound enabled RsM (who was no stranger to a CashApp beg even when she was flying up and down the country for a shag). And Bex - who is currently doing exactly the same thing. The sooner you delete your account and stop stealing, the sooner we will stop highlighting your theft.
Click to expand...

Helped others? How? I'm reading a book (for Reann, that's paper pages in a cardboard cover with words inside that you read, hopefully to learn something) at the moment about self-delusion, and how we live in an age where people think performing an identity on the Internet is the same as actvism, while the actual forces of real change (grassroots organising, trade unions, etc) still exist in the fringes. And yet these idiots act like they deserve an MBE for posting their every thought online.

Regarding harassment, talking about someone, not to them, isn't really harassment. If you have to seek out the things people are saying about you, the best way to save yourself any "distress" is to just stop looking at it?
 
Last edited:
ahkrin said:
Bit of a stretch to say it's a disability hate crime when we only criticise the (afaik non-disabled) parents. And the racism comment is a bigger projection than when they light up tower bridge.
Click to expand...
Discrimination by association (eg excluding parents from services specifically because their children are disabled or from a specific ethic background etc) is a thing in equalities law, not sure if it's a thing in hate crime legislation though.
Either way, I agree, it's quite the stretch in this situation.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top