PTWM #202 Rach gets pierced, Josh gets p!ssed, That pelican mouth has never been kissed.

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
1
BusyDoinNuffin said:
Correct me if I am wrong, but Betsy isn’t even qualified. I hope she has the appropriate approvals from the regularly authority to care (unqualified) for children in her own home. That will require risk assessment etc. let’s hope she is declaring those earnings and, finally, she has something in writing from the school confirming that any outside care arrangements are strictly between her and the parents. There is a risk to them (imagine if something awful happened) there would need to be recourse at school too. They need to ensure they clearly define where her work for them finishes and the relationship with the family begins. I come back to the fact she has no qualification so what on earth are these parents thinking.
Click to expand...

The school is an excellent school I used to work there many years ago and then returned to train staff there. The school has pretty solid procedures in place. Betsey would have done a lot of in house training and will probably be on her level 3, the school is very good at providing training and qualifications for their staff.
 
Seenthelighttorbay said:
The school is an excellent school I used to work there many years ago and then returned to train staff there. The school has pretty solid procedures in place. Betsey would have done a lot of in house training and will probably be on her level 3, the school is very good at providing training and qualifications for their staff.
Click to expand...

And then she’ll take all that training and duck off travelling again on her rotten mother’s scammed cash.
 
I just skidded over here to say what the very fucks are the day in the life off ? Who the fucks told the relatable bint to do them ?
no ones arsed gerl …. Obsessed with Damon ? Tell me more ?….pies and petrol ?
wheres the not managing a cup of tea because works so busy ? Having a wee when you have just done whatever ? &
You look like 14 year old boy burning bins lad
 
Using neurodiversity week to sell her book, what the duck is wrong with her 🤯

IMG_4465.jpeg
 
Any school that see,knows Bs social media presence via her mother is not a good school.and then if after her bloody mother announced it they keep sending vulnerable kids home. after seeing the state of the toxic air in that house? No way would they tick any box for a stable,calm and safe space for our most vulnerable kids to be.
They would also be straight off the list simply for the risk factor that R does film at random times and you can't guarantee the kids anonymity. It would just blurr the lines too much to be considered. One day of watching R social media page and theyd be offthe requirement needed.
 
Seenthelighttorbay said:
The school is an excellent school I used to work there many years ago and then returned to train staff there. The school has pretty solid procedures in place. Betsey would have done a lot of in house training and will probably be on her level 3, the school is very good at providing training and qualifications for their staff.
Click to expand...
I have no doubts about that. My point is that as a parent of an ND child, knowing many other ND children with different and complex needs, I would not leave my child with an unqualified practitioner. I’m sure there is lots of in-house training and B may very well be in the midst of her L3 but at school she has the benefit of qualified and experienced colleagues around her. The risk comes once she is working on a 1:1 basis, in an environment that is probably not risk assessed with a stream of other people and triggers. If you include W in that, the suggestion from Rach being he requires 1:2, I don’t think it is safe. What happens when a child dysregulates? Is a runner? A refuser? Who manages that properly and looks after the other children when B is chasing a runner up her path? She may very well have maybo training but nobody else in that household does, what happens if their instinct is to step in and injury occurs? My point is that I have no issue with experienced and qualified practitioners, in a properly assessed environment, but not entry level, social media wannabe.
 
katesbess said:
Any school that see,knows Bs social media presence via her mother is not a good school.and then if after her bloody mother announced it they keep sending vulnerable kids home. after seeing the state of the toxic air in that house? No way would they tick any box for a stable,calm and safe space for our most vulnerable kids to be.
They would also be straight off the list simply for the risk factor that R does film at random times and you can't guarantee the kids anonymity. It would just blurr the lines too much to be considered. One day of watching R social media page and theyd be offthe requirement needed.
Click to expand...
But do they have time to be constantly checking the social media of every single employee? She's posted a photo from within the school before (didn't show students or location however) and has been shown on Rachael's stories before saying things that might be thought of as derogatory about where she works (not very nice, but probably no more than most of us have said in private when talking to partner or friends about work). Most of the "bad" stuff is on PTWM account, - if they looked on Betsy's they would probably just see what every other 19 / 20 year is posting of nights out etc, with some tit ads for Wild deodorant thrown in. From the effort she's made from dressing up etc for theme days and other things she's said, Betsy seems to really be enjoying her job (I think it's the job she's had for the longest time?), it would be a real shame if her mother's need to monetise and share everything ruined it for her.
 
Thing is, you know she will ruin this for Betsy. Everything the kids do has to involve her so it won't be long before she overshares something and gets Betsy in trouble. It will then be blamed on the 'nasty trolls' instead of her realising she shouldn't be inserting herself into her 19 year old daughters working life in the first place.
She can't stand them having anything going on that doesn't involve her and her phone. She's no better than her 'toxic' parents she is always complaining about.
 
BusyDoinNuffin said:
I have no doubts about that. My point is that as a parent of an ND child, knowing many other ND children with different and complex needs, I would not leave my child with an unqualified practitioner. I’m sure there is lots of in-house training and B may very well be in the midst of her L3 but at school she has the benefit of qualified and experienced colleagues around her. The risk comes once she is working on a 1:1 basis, in an environment that is probably not risk assessed with a stream of other people and triggers. If you include W in that, the suggestion from Rach being he requires 1:2, I don’t think it is safe. What happens when a child dysregulates? Is a runner? A refuser? Who manages that properly and looks after the other children when B is chasing a runner up her path? She may very well have maybo training but nobody else in that household does, what happens if their instinct is to step in and injury occurs? My point is that I have no issue with experienced and qualified practitioners, in a properly assessed environment, but not entry level, social media wannabe.
Click to expand...

What happens if Wobble is having a meltdown? That can’t be a very calm environment for another ND child.
 
I hope one by one all her children leave and go and do something good for themselves and she's left with level 8127 non verbal child that she so badly wanted but then didn't! Josh would have ran off and be with the Mrs Marshall number 4 and Rach will still trying to squeeze her size 12 body into a pair of size 8 gym leggings!
 
Queeniebee said:
I hope one by one all her children leave and go and do something good for themselves and she's left with level 8127 non verbal child that she so badly wanted but then didn't! Josh would have ran off and be with the Mrs Marshall number 4 and Rach will still trying to squeeze her size 12 body into a pair of size 8 gym leggings!
Click to expand...
Me too. Trouble is look at them, already so brainwashed. What "normal" regulated child would ever,ever allow or think it ok to have shared the bits of their life they do? I can't imagine it. Well, I can't imagine it simply because it's so unthinkable for my parents or anyone around me to do! They wouldn't.so I can't even put myself in that position and think nah no way, i wouldn't be OK with that. Because it just would not happen. And thank god for that. But those kids do. Apart from T who keeps trying her best to get the camera away from her. But then she keeps keeps sharing this private pictures of their life. The most private,the most sacred and meant to be safe parts of their lives.

And true narc Rach will do anything to stop them having a life, not being in her control and or having anything good. We've already seen what means she goes to do this.
 
BusyDoinNuffin said:
I have no doubts about that. My point is that as a parent of an ND child, knowing many other ND children with different and complex needs, I would not leave my child with an unqualified practitioner. I’m sure there is lots of in-house training and B may very well be in the midst of her L3 but at school she has the benefit of qualified and experienced colleagues around her. The risk comes once she is working on a 1:1 basis, in an environment that is probably not risk assessed with a stream of other people and triggers. If you include W in that, the suggestion from Rach being he requires 1:2, I don’t think it is safe. What happens when a child dysregulates? Is a runner? A refuser? Who manages that properly and looks after the other children when B is chasing a runner up her path? She may very well have maybo training but nobody else in that household does, what happens if their instinct is to step in and injury occurs? My point is that I have no issue with experienced and qualified practitioners, in a properly assessed environment, but not entry level, social media wannabe.
Click to expand...

I wasn't disagreeing with you, I just don't want to the school to get a bad name because of ratchet and bracket. The school invests in their staff and pupils. Its parental choice and the parents have chosen Bracket to care for their child. I personally wouldn't have but they have. They may not be aware of what goes on in the household.
---
Marshallmum1982 said:
Thing is, you know she will ruin this for Betsy. Everything the kids do has to involve her so it won't be long before she overshares something and gets Betsy in trouble. It will then be blamed on the 'nasty trolls' instead of her realising she shouldn't be inserting herself into her 19 year old daughters working life in the first place.
She can't stand them having anything going on that doesn't involve her and her phone. She's no better than her 'toxic' parents she is always complaining about.
Click to expand...


This 100 percent
 
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Back
Top