bagpuss17278
VIP Member
Lots of new videos on the IG page that shall not be named. Some amusing. Some a little childish.
The art attack head is funnyLots of new videos on the IG page that shall not be named. Some amusing. Some a little childish.
I'm not remotely sorry for writing anything about her or anyone else anywhere on the internet. In Rachael's case perhaps she should stop writing about people on her social media and permanently in print before she complains any further. After all I/ we can always delete if I/ we choose, she can't delete the vitriol in those books .I’m sorry, but expressing my disdain and writing on a forum about someone who shamelessly shares their children’s most private moments, does not mean that there is something wrong with me. It appalls me that she is flippant about safeguarding her children.
It’s disgusting that she thinks it’s ok to share that her daughter passed a blood clot the size of a fist, leaving people to speculate if it could have been a miscarriage (she even said she questioned her daughter about whether it could have been a pregnancy)
It’s awful that she thinks it’s ok to share her children’s sexual activity and visits to GUM clinics.
It’s hypocritical that she thinks it’s ok to talk about and do podcasts regarding absent family members (the step daughters, the girls’ Dad, the boys’ Mum, her siblings etc.) She says horrible things about them and yet no one is allowed to say anything against her? She herself hates these people, harasses them, abuses and writes about them online via her social media platforms and in her books….. HYPOCRITE!
As, I believe, was the response
---
Plus, I think we all know that Silky’s bum hole is as frictionless as his legs
The irony is completely lost on her isnt it? At least we're not monetising what we write about herWhat about if you write books about them
The death stare that she's made better gravy than him
By the way Rach, she's 15 now.
View attachment 2815428 q