Oh totally. His excuse that he stayed in the nyc place that time because he was going to ‘break it off’ with him but he ended up staying four days for ‘convenience’ is barely an excuse at all it’s so flimsy - at this point Epstein had been charged as a sex offender and everything! What baffles the mind is how he went into that interview without a better answer prepared about why he stayed there. Emily Maitlis seemed in disobelief that that was all he had on that one, she asked several times. Some mutterings about it being full of people like a palace... but let’s put it straight. What innocent person would want to stay at the home of a convicted sex offender? Even if it was large and full of staff. Especially if you don’t even know the guy well as he claims! (Another instance where that line doesn’t make sense)