There are gag orders and there are injunctions.
Gag orders relate to criminal trials, injunctions in civil trials. Even in Ralph Harris, gag orders only suppress a limited amount of info for the purpose of protecting victims. The only gag orders that would prevent the reporting of the fact of a criminal trial is if there are multiple prosecutions, in order not to prejudice future trials.
I get the feeling it’s not crime, as PS would be at the Bailey. I think a civil suit is likely, and I wonder if it’s termination of contract and all the sordid bullying and dodgy behaviour is central. I personally live and work in a jurisdiction with no super injunctions, and they’ve long been criticised as being a tool used by the rich to manipulate the system
The proof will be when PS has to disappear to attend court, wether any news agency will report it or not.
The British paparazzi must be sitting on so much info they can’t print.
And I am not even in the uk, lol, this is all just interesting from a legal point of view.