Phillip Schofield #49 Holly asks "Are you ok?", Phil cries "I'm gaaaaay I'm gaaaaaaay"

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
1
It's nothing to do with the rights of children and their status in society (nice try at deflection) - it's about making them available for sex with adults with no repercussions.

This is not about age gap relationships at all

This is what some find hard to understand if you have a decent mind there’s people that believe children are sexual beings from birth “professionals”

What’s this about do you think it’s the rights of children?

Did you hear those P.I.E men say children need to be taught at younger age?

WHO wants children by the age of 9 to hear first sexual experiences of adults and to know if they want to have a sexual experience or not, 0-4 pleasure and enjoyment of touching themselves

 

Attachments

  • 6002D1BB-9577-4C6A-8F92-A636E6C4E809.jpeg
    6002D1BB-9577-4C6A-8F92-A636E6C4E809.jpeg
    93.5 KB · Views: 31
That (second) Youtube video is sickening but I'm glad (as one Youtuber commenter says) that they had the chance to speak, because they showed who they truly were.

The interviewer had the guy on the left "on the ropes" towards the end, and floundering, anyway, as he knew the point he was trying to make was nonsense - who is he to talk for all children? How does he know what's right for a child and what they are emotionally and physically mature enough for?

Of course it's an abuse of power. Children can't consent.

It's nothing to do with the rights of children and their status in society (nice try at deflection) - it's about making them available for sex with adults with no repercussions.

I dearly hope these two scumbags aren't parents. Maddening but at least we learn from history. How P.I.E. gained any traction and media attention back then is absolutely astonishing.

What is worrying is that some of these people likely still walk amongst us.
This is happening again now - certain sections of society trying to break down safeguarding for children and arguing that young children should be aware of all elements of sexual fetishism etc etc. It’s done in the name of progressivism so if you object or raise concerns, you’re painted as a bigot.
As for Tatchell, I recall him delivering a eulogy or writing an obituary (can’t remember which) for one of his friends who was a known pedalo.
 
This is happening again now - certain sections of society trying to break down safeguarding for children and arguing that young children should be aware of all elements of sexual fetishism etc etc. It’s done in the name of progressivism so if you object or raise concerns, you’re painted as a bigot.
As for Tatchell, I recall him delivering a eulogy or writing an obituary (can’t remember which) for one of his friends who was a known pedalo.

It was for Ian Dunn. Founder of PIE. You can tell can't you, it's the specs and the slightly wide ranging eye.

phillip-schofield-pedalo-glasses.jpg


ooops

Ian_Dunn.jpg


We called them 'pedalo glasses'. It's a shame they aren't so easy to spot these days.
 
What’s that got to do with anything?????

Because it was mentioned about educating children at a younger age about sex etc. Under a quote at the top of this page.

I mean, look at the absolute shambles that is sex education in the UK, I can understand why wanting a decent, reformed education around the subject is discussed. And if you have any idea about sexual development and how early some things happen, I can also appreciate why a reform is needed.
 
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Back
Top