Mrs Makeup #7 Michelle with her airs and graces, off to be a celebrity at the races

1
I’m unsure whether they understand hypocrisy in the Reggazolli- Stone household 🤬🤬🤬
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0561.jpeg
    IMG_0561.jpeg
    53.4 KB · Views: 8
Tiggers_news said:
I’m unsure whether they understand hypocrisy in the Reggazolli- Stone household 🤬🤬🤬
Click to expand...

bleeping hell the actual NECK of her posting anything about animal welfare
Filthy scumbag family she married into and the absolute HORROR of what they did to animals

I'm actually mortified for her, she's either as thick as a plank or has a solid brass neck and doesn't give a duck.

The ego enters the room before she does to be fair so I'd imagine it's the latter
 
BellabeauJo said:
bleeping hell the actual NECK of her posting anything about animal welfare
Filthy scumbag family she married into and the absolute HORROR of what they did to animals

I'm actually mortified for her, she's either as thick as a plank or has a solid brass neck and doesn't give a duck.

The ego enters the room before she does to be fair so I'd imagine it's the latter
Click to expand...
I’d go with both
 
She has some neck.......animal welfare doesn't run in that family...
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20241121_170226_Chrome.jpg
    Screenshot_20241121_170226_Chrome.jpg
    54.4 KB · Views: 8
  • Screenshot_20241121_170234_Chrome.jpg
    Screenshot_20241121_170234_Chrome.jpg
    64.1 KB · Views: 4
  • Screenshot_20241121_170242_Chrome.jpg
    Screenshot_20241121_170242_Chrome.jpg
    64.1 KB · Views: 4
  • Screenshot_20241121_170249_Chrome.jpg
    Screenshot_20241121_170249_Chrome.jpg
    51.8 KB · Views: 6
  • Screenshot_20241121_170256_Chrome.jpg
    Screenshot_20241121_170256_Chrome.jpg
    64.6 KB · Views: 5
  • Screenshot_20241121_170301_Chrome.jpg
    Screenshot_20241121_170301_Chrome.jpg
    62.4 KB · Views: 7
  • Screenshot_20241121_170308_Chrome.jpg
    Screenshot_20241121_170308_Chrome.jpg
    62.6 KB · Views: 8
  • Screenshot_20241121_170314_Chrome.jpg
    Screenshot_20241121_170314_Chrome.jpg
    59.9 KB · Views: 4
  • Screenshot_20241121_170320_Chrome.jpg
    Screenshot_20241121_170320_Chrome.jpg
    70.4 KB · Views: 5
  • Screenshot_20241121_170324_Chrome.jpg
    Screenshot_20241121_170324_Chrome.jpg
    63.6 KB · Views: 5
  • Screenshot_20241121_170331_Chrome.jpg
    Screenshot_20241121_170331_Chrome.jpg
    58.2 KB · Views: 12
Dogs trust using feckin designer dogs owned by influencers is alot of the animal welfare issues. We have a mutt, adopted. Kids adore her. They always look at the big designer dogs too and I refuse to feed into puppy farms which in turns feeds into the huge amount of people not considering what dog ownership really is then feeds into rescues which are bursting at the seams.
 
Amazing they can speak out for Natasha O Brien but complete radio silence about yesterday’s verdict of that rapist Conor McGregor. The level of violence shown in court that Nikita Hand experienced at the hands of that monster, Internal bruising, being choked, a forceps to be used to remove a tampon, post traumatic stress
Shame on everyone of those Insta huns this morning who have not supported this lady, afraid to speak out over that knacker Erin McGregor.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0603.jpeg
    IMG_0603.jpeg
    44.9 KB · Views: 8
  • IMG_0604.jpeg
    IMG_0604.jpeg
    51.9 KB · Views: 8
Bellatrix#7 said:
Amazing they can speak out for Natasha O Brien but complete radio silence about yesterday’s verdict of that rapist Conor McGregor. The level of violence shown in court that Nikita Hand experienced at the hands of that monster, Internal bruising, being choked, a forceps to be used to remove a tampon, post traumatic stress
Shame on everyone of those Insta huns this morning who have not supported this lady, afraid to speak out over that knacker Erin McGregor.
Click to expand...

It’s not the same really though, is it? Natasha O Brien was an unprovoked attack walking down the street. Therefore influencers spoke out against attacks on innocent women. Nikita’s was a civil case for money. She had to go home and TELL her boyfriend she spend the night in a hotel room with Conor Mc Gregor! The DPP decided there was simply not enough evidence for a criminal case. I do have to ask if it wasn’t a Mc Gregor in the box, if the jury would’ve been a favourable?
 
Iamwoman said:
It’s not the same really though, is it? Natasha O Brien was an unprovoked attack walking down the street. Therefore influencers spoke out against attacks on innocent women. Nikita’s was a civil case for money. She had to go home and TELL her boyfriend she spend the night in a hotel room with Conor Mc Gregor! The DPP decided there was simply not enough evidence for a criminal case. I do have to ask if it wasn’t a Mc Gregor in the box, if the jury would’ve been a favourable?
Click to expand...
Rape is an unprovoked attack.
 
I got up at 5am said:
It’s rape. He raped her & regardless we should ALL be speaking out against any sort of violence against women.
Click to expand...
Did the court decide it was rape? Yes, violence against women is wrong! However, this was a civil case for money. The DPP decided there was not enough evidence for a criminal trial.
 
Iamwoman said:
Did the court decide it was rape? Yes, violence against women is wrong! However, this was a civil case for money. The DPP decided there was not enough evidence for a criminal trial.
Click to expand...
If it was about money she would have take the rumoured 1m he offered to keep quiet.
the fact the DPP let her down by not taking action, she took the civil case to prove he did attack her that night and the night his thugs broke into her home and stabbed her partner. No one would put themselves through all that for a scabby 250k
 
Kiiiikiiii said:
If it was about money she would have take the rumoured 1m he offered to keep quiet.
the fact the DPP let her down by not taking action, she took the civil case to prove he did attack her that night and the night his thugs broke into her home and stabbed her partner. No one would put themselves through all that for a scabby 250k
Click to expand...
That’s a rumour, though! Where is the story on that? The DPP made an informed decision based on the evidence. Didn’t they see more evidence as well? The judge said he wasn’t allowing the attack on her home as evidence. He didn’t believe it was connected to Conor.
 
Iamwoman said:
It’s not the same really though, is it? Natasha O Brien was an unprovoked attack walking down the street. Therefore influencers spoke out against attacks on innocent women. Nikita’s was a civil case for money. She had to go home and TELL her boyfriend she spend the night in a hotel room with Conor Mc Gregor! The DPP decided there was simply not enough evidence for a criminal case. I do have to ask if it wasn’t a Mc Gregor in the box, if the jury would’ve been a favourable?
Click to expand...
Only because the DPP said there wasn’t enough evidence to bring a case!! How often is this the case for many Rape victims in this country, it doesn’t make it right whatever the scenario. What do you mean by a favourable jury? Seriously? Give your head a wobble, he should be locked up for the many rapes of women that he was never charged for. He’s a monster and a disgrace is what he is, Dee is worse for standing by a cheating, rapist monster who hasn’t an ounce of respect for her or his children, she’s clearly only with him for the money is all & the only reason his family stood by him in court as the bank of Conor would dry up fairly quickly. He’s no respect for women. Hopefully all the other women he’s raped will now come forward and speak out. His parents must be so proud of him!!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top