Mother Pukka #3 I think we might be remarkable

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
1
Just need to reiterate how much she does NOT know stripey top yet. She thinks she does. She thinks he’s told her everything and she’s seen exactly who he is. She hasn’t. It takes YEARS to get to know someone properly. Plus the type of man who love bombs and accelerates everything the way he has is usually the type of man who hides who he really is.

And she’s chosen to marry him, have a kid with him and involve her own children. Bravo Anna.
 
I once dated a man like this. I was completely enthralled. I remember sitting in the back of a taxi and telling myself I had never felt so loved, when after four weeks he told me he wished he'd met me first and had his kids with me (and wanted me to have one with him). Funnily enough, three messy years later he was gone and I thank my lucky stars every day that I didn't agree to have that child with him.
 
pennypinchpam said:
Here we are. From the archives 🤮
Click to expand...

this post is vile and illuminates the fact she had given thought to NOT inviting them!! Wtf! Surely you just invite their best friends or do whole class? She’s tried to look woke and instead looks like a pathetic joke! Rhyme intended. I can’t get over this .. who the duck divides their kids class by race, religion, disability or their BMI!!!
 
GingerSquid said:
this post is vile and illuminates the fact she had given thought to NOT inviting them!! Wtf! Surely you just invite their best friends or do whole class? She’s tried to look woke and instead looks like a pathetic joke! Rhyme intended. I can’t get over this .. who the duck divides their kids class by race, religion, disability or their BMI!!!
Click to expand...
You’re right. It’s like publishing a self-serving ‘don’t push minority groups into moving traffic’ when the idea had simply not occurred to anyone anyway.
 
Stringyone said:
Follow up to lala’s original post. Problem is that Anna is trying to normalise her super fast new relationship/pregnancy/engagement by squawking about stigma. Lala treading carefully.
Click to expand...
Anna has definitely been in DMs with her “I’m just a fumbling sleep deprived crisp packet mum making mistakes and telling my truth”. It’s a campaign when you solicit press, media and articles about “breaking stigmas” that don’t exist to brush past poor and risky life choices.
 
b20212017 said:
.

She does wield a lot of power that’s the thing. I doubt she got in touch as they don’t follow eachother. I think lala is just careful and knows better than to draw attention from someone with an army of blind rats praising their every insane move. She isn’t doing anything illegal just bloody stupid. Her content aside from this has always been very clear, as a social worker from the experiences she’s had and seen, rushing in with a new partner when kids are involved is a huge red flag for predatory or abusive behaviour. Hopefully Anna is the exception for the kids sake and hopefully no one else sees this and thinks it’s normal. Because it isn’t.
Click to expand...

Anna will have seen it. And she would have been in touch with her instantly, hence the back peddling and the “Good luck to this person” nonsense. Anna doesn’t have to be following someone to get wind of things, believe me.

Plus, her and her other influencer friends will
have have read it on here and their sad little WhatsApp group will have been pinging away over it (hi guys!)

She Is very calculating and goes over and above to protect herself.

I just wish other people wouldn‘t always back down, or start grovelling to her.
---
hattie27 said:
Why the blocking of people liking comments?
Click to expand...

Because she can’t risk anyone who may also write comments she doesn’t like in future. They all do it and it’s pathetic.
 
Last edited:
mamaCP123 said:
I got blocked! For one comment that simply asked what the stigma was exactly. LOL. She's absolutely unhinged.
Click to expand...
Easier to block you than admit there isn't one, it's just her own prejudice she's having to undo. The more she bangs on, the more obvious it is that she feels a very strong need to "justify" her choices.shes trying so bleeping hard to sound like a trail blazer when really it's extremely normal to have blended families. Maybe not quite at the speed of light, but otherwise, normal.
 
Last edited:
yellow_daisies said:
Easier to block you than admit there isn't one, it's just her own prejudice she's having to undo. The more she bangs on, the more obvious it is that she feels a very strong need to "justify" her choices.shes trying so bleeping hard to sound like a trail blazer when really it's extremely normal to have blended families. Maybe not quite at the speed of light, but otherwise, normal.
Click to expand...
THIS! So much this. She’s using a non issue to justify her poor and irresponsible decision making and trying to manipulate any critique she’s received as a result of blending families faster than a Vitamix with a random she met within 3 months (she met him in Sept, got engaged in Dec) into “stigma against blended families”.

the royal family is a blended family. And has been for many many many generations. What is she even talking about?

On another note, she needs to stop banging on about being a mum of 5. She is not a mum of 5. Stripey’s kids have a mum because she’s not dead (if she was, we can all be assured Anna would be campaigning for breaking stigmas that don’t exist against widows) . At best, Anna is the step mother for a whole of two minutes who’s trying to exploit having step kids for content. It’s entirely disrespectful to their actual mum. Stripey should really get her to wind her neck in and show his ex the respect she deserves.
 
You know what gets me about Anna is she does something for 5 minutes and suddenly she’s the world’s expert at it. The arrogance.

parenting
Divorcing
Magpie-ing
Finding “love” after divorce
Getting up the duff in her 40s
STEP PARENTING 🥴

Easy to look like everyone is agreeing with you if you’re deleting any comments to the contrary and blocking those that co-sign the comment by liking.
 
Lalalaletmeexplain did seem to go straight from backtracking a bit about MP to then posting about particular situations where women put the new male partner first and all the things that can go wrong so I think she backtracked enough to keep the instahuns off her back but knows for sure what an utter tit show it is.
 
pennypinchpam said:
THIS! So much this. She’s using a non issue to justify her poor and irresponsible decision making and trying to manipulate any critique she’s received as a result of blending families faster than a Vitamix with a random she met within 3 months (she met him in Sept, got engaged in Dec) into “stigma against blended families”.

the royal family is a blended family. And has been for many many many generations. What is she even talking about?

On another note, she needs to stop banging on about being a mum of 5. She is not a mum of 5. Stripey’s kids have a mum because she’s not dead (if she was, we can all be assured Anna would be campaigning for breaking stigmas that don’t exist against widows) . At best, Anna is the step mother for a whole of two minutes who’s trying to exploit having step kids for content. It’s entirely disrespectful to their actual mum. Stripey should really get her to wind her neck in and show his ex the respect she deserves.
Click to expand...
Yes! It's really starting to sound very calculated. She knew people were going to judge this bizarre whirlwind of insanity she's currently swirling around in (no doubt with a multitude of empty crisp packets) and she preemptively decided it was going to be A Cause. Except its backfiring because people are still judging AND pointing out that her prejudice is showing. Blended families have always existed, some harmoniously and some not. She's not reinventing the wheel or smashing any stigmas here!
And yes it's hugely disrespect to his ex to be referring to herself as his kids "mum". It's a bit vague, but I'm guessing his children don't live with them full time? Presumably nor do hers since they'll be spending time with their dad in whatever arrangement they have? So all 5 children being in the house wont be an all the time thing? And with the latest info that Stripey allegedly works 24/7 and is just barely able to "carve out an hour" to touch base with his kids it's starting to look like getting a new PeRsOn was a cheaper option than getting a nanny for the time he has his children... I said what I said.
---
WeHadFunRight said:
You know what gets me about Anna is she does something for 5 minutes and suddenly she’s the world’s expert at it. The arrogance.

parenting
Divorcing
Magpie-ing
Finding “love” after divorce
Getting up the duff in her 40s
STEP PARENTING 🥴

Easy to look like everyone is agreeing with you if you’re deleting any comments to the contrary and blocking those that co-sign the comment by liking.
Click to expand...
And she's only ever speaking from her own very specific set of circumstances and experiences! The confidence/arrogance she has is astounding!
 
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Back
Top