I've been watching some old food diary videos (work is very slow at the moment) and lo and behold. The fake baby makes an appearance here at 4:45 in this classic. (My favourite part is when she films herself taking a nap but the specialest turkey in the world from Aldi is a close second)
Thomas is such a melt. He's just so slimey and smarmy. Ick.
I agree that they are different for everyone, however Mel has an holier than thou attitude towards being a mother. Therefore it seems that she thinks C-section is an easy way out, which it defintiely isn't. No one has ever had a more painful birth than her and no one is ever going to be a mother of two before her. She often acts like she has invented pregnancy and that only she knows how it is. She also acts like she can just go in to the hospital and say I want a C-section and they'll just grant it her. She obviously haven't got a clue.
This may have been said already but to be fair, after a fourth degree tear they will usually actively encourage a section so they would almost certainly grant one at maternal request in her case. After a severe tear and similar complications, or after a previous c section, you can generally choose which route to take next time around, pretty much no questions asked.
I think Rudy O’ Rourke is original and more importantly ( for Mel) non-binary , she can thank me laterIf it's Rudolph O' Rourke I can honestly die happy
His name is David . You could see a banner of his name in one of her stories months ago in the MILS house in the room they had all his toys.Pans name starts and ends with D if I remember from some stories of his birthday where his name was in them
Maybe it’s the FILs from childhood, they’ve got a thing about recycling old family belongingsHis name is David . You could see a banner of his name in one of her stories months ago in the MILS house in the room they had all his toys.
From what I recall her consultant was looking at induction ,they were concerned the baby was on the large side ,but she was having none of it .I’m not surprised she ended up tearing.This may have been said already but to be fair, after a fourth degree tear they will usually actively encourage a section so they would almost certainly grant one at maternal request in her case. After a severe tear and similar complications, or after a previous c section, you can generally choose which route to take next time around, pretty much no questions asked.
(Also, tbh, you can choose a section even in ordinary circumstances, they just usually make you jump through a couple of hoops first. But after a fourth degree tear they certainly wouldn’t stand in your way if you wanted a c section and many doctors would actively advise against another vaginal.)
From what I recall her consultant was looking at induction ,they were concerned the baby was on the large side ,but she was having none of it .I’m not surprised she ended up tearing.
I think she was? that’s why they wanted to move her to theatre but she wanted to carry on pushing.She was probably offered a c section with her first as well but I think I remember she stated she didn’t want a c section. I was offered c section or induction due to my baby measuring big and I chose induction but my waters broke a few days before I was due to have a sweep. I can see her trying for a natural birth again, but she will be at higher risk of tearing because she did before as far as I’m aware not necessarily to the same degree as the 1st time but I know quite a lot of women who had 4th degree tear had a 2nd or 3rd degree with the next birth
Don’t they call him Davey Paul?His name is David . You could see a banner of his name in one of her stories months ago in the MILS house in the room they had all his toys.
I found the original postDon’t they call him Davey Paul?
All I can think of is Baby David in the Royle FamilyHis name is David . You could see a banner of his name in one of her stories months ago in the MILS house in the room they had all his toys.