Louise Pentland #10 Nicole navigates content I create, kids increase my engagement rate!

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
1
I'm still fuming about her asking us to save the Darcy leaf post on Instagram, a few pages back. I bit my tongue with the ridiculous Christmas decorations expense/"you can do it too" condescending crap, but I'm really, really tempted to say something to her regarding this (even although I haven't used my Instagram for months and I'm not in that great a place mentally to deal with her passive aggressive response and/or minion retaliation).

We all know she's only asking for the save, for the algorithm, but how can anyone be an ambassador for a charity that protects children and ask complete strangers to save a video of their young child? Surely, she can't be that stupid? Choosing to expose your kids on social media is one thing and different people have different levels they are comfortable with (and I know viewers will/can save videos/photos regardless of you asking), but it shows that getting her ratings up, means more than the safety of her own child here...that's what I can't get my head around. We can nit-pick her lack of parenting and our opinions there will vary, but I'm flabbergasted she or anyone could think this is ok and can't see how wrong it is. She was married to a teacher, now engaged to a detective, how can she not have ANY knowledge of the dangers of publicly sharing child images and videos and asking to save them for future 'reference'? Reference for what exactly, because we've never seen leaves before? There's NO justification for asking people to save that post, none. The NSPCC need to see that and ditch her pronto, she's not an ally to kids, she's a danger.
 
I am in awe of her lack of common sense at this point. After listening to a few horrendous speeches about the freaks and creeps who create such networks, I am amazed she's even keeping her child content up for all to access. It's one thing if Darcy wants to be on social media publicly once she is an adult. Again and again I'm amazed at how Liam can be chill about this. Even if he intervened, I'm sure Lousy Louise would clap back with some "my kids, my house, my rules" type of tit. I don't even see Liam as an equal part in that family anymore, based on how Louise portrays the whole dynamic.
 
Noona said:
I'm still fuming about her asking us to save the Darcy leaf post on Instagram, a few pages back. I bit my tongue with the ridiculous Christmas decorations expense/"you can do it too" condescending crap, but I'm really, really tempted to say something to her regarding this (even although I haven't used my Instagram for months and I'm not in that great a place mentally to deal with her passive aggressive response and/or minion retaliation).

We all know she's only asking for the save, for the algorithm, but how can anyone be an ambassador for a charity that protects children and ask complete strangers to save a video of their young child? Surely, she can't be that stupid? Choosing to expose your kids on social media is one thing and different people have different levels they are comfortable with (and I know viewers will/can save videos/photos regardless of you asking), but it shows that getting her ratings up, means more than the safety of her own child here...that's what I can't get my head around. We can nit-pick her lack of parenting and our opinions there will vary, but I'm flabbergasted she or anyone could think this is ok and can't see how wrong it is. She was married to a teacher, now engaged to a detective, how can she not have ANY knowledge of the dangers of publicly sharing child images and videos and asking to save them for future 'reference'? Reference for what exactly, because we've never seen leaves before? There's NO justification for asking people to save that post, none. The NSPCC need to see that and ditch her pronto, she's not an ally to kids, she's a danger.
Click to expand...
I was shocked too!! I think that she is realising that Darcy is 99% of her earnings and engagement so she is cashing out whilst she still can! I think it kills her that she isn't better than that, that she isn't a successful author or clothing designer. She truly is just a youtuber who got famous off the back of Zoella and now sells her kids privacy to make money. Her books were merch. I wonder how she sleeps at night!
 
Sailorchibbi said:
5k on decorations , when people are loosing their jobs and 3 million have been excluded and loosing their business’s. Honestly.

Obviously she can do what she likes with her money, but justifying it by saying “when I was on 16k when I was younger” - just shows how privileged she is. 16k is still a lot of money to a lot of people. I wish I had been on that in my early twenties.
Click to expand...

Kick in the face that, my mum is a cash office manager and she gets 20k a year and I’ve seen her pay slip she gets...£1,223 (after tax obv)a month . She’s 60 and works 6am- 5pm (half the time stays longer as she’s on salary she isn’t paid for the extra) 6 days a week. Makes me physically sick these influencers getting paid that much hand on heart unless I was giving half to help ppl in need I could never accept 10k to promote a toothbrush etc
 
sophiavictoria said:
Is it just me that finds it weird that in her most recent Swarovski ad she says that baths are ‘a chance to escape from my family’, I might just be being picky but I feel like she could’ve just said ‘it’s a chance for a bit of alone time’, just something a bit less harsh and dramatic 😂
Click to expand...
Yeah honestly starting to see why people are getting bored of “honest mumming” seems like they don’t enjoy time with the kids. But I guess lockdown has exacerbated things...
 
Noona said:
I'm still fuming about her asking us to save the Darcy leaf post on Instagram, a few pages back. I bit my tongue with the ridiculous Christmas decorations expense/"you can do it too" condescending crap, but I'm really, really tempted to say something to her regarding this (even although I haven't used my Instagram for months and I'm not in that great a place mentally to deal with her passive aggressive response and/or minion retaliation).

We all know she's only asking for the save, for the algorithm, but how can anyone be an ambassador for a charity that protects children and ask complete strangers to save a video of their young child? Surely, she can't be that stupid? Choosing to expose your kids on social media is one thing and different people have different levels they are comfortable with (and I know viewers will/can save videos/photos regardless of you asking), but it shows that getting her ratings up, means more than the safety of her own child here...that's what I can't get my head around. We can nit-pick her lack of parenting and our opinions there will vary, but I'm flabbergasted she or anyone could think this is ok and can't see how wrong it is. She was married to a teacher, now engaged to a detective, how can she not have ANY knowledge of the dangers of publicly sharing child images and videos and asking to save them for future 'reference'? Reference for what exactly, because we've never seen leaves before? There's NO justification for asking people to save that post, none. The NSPCC need to see that and ditch her pronto, she's not an ally to kids, she's a danger.
Click to expand...
I, and many others on this thread, understand how you feel. If you don’t want to contact Louise directly as we know she’ll get pissy, it might be worth contacting her management company. Why would someone actively encourage strangers to save pictures/videos of their child?!?
 
I saw this graphic and made think of Louise's comment: "Save this video of Darcy for future reference". She only did it for the algorithm.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20201119-061905.png
    Screenshot_20201119-061905.png
    72.2 KB · Views: 268
Happymeinthecanaryislands said:
I saw this graphic and made think of Louise's comment: "Save this video of Darcy for future reference". She only did it for the algorithm.
Click to expand...

oh yeah she outright admitted this last time she asked people to save a picture, literally ‘save this picture of Darcy for my engagement/the algorithm‘. Handing your kid out to perverts on a silver platter but never mind, you got those clicks, eh?
 
Do we thinking she's leading up to quitting with all these Darcy ads? Making as much as she can before going cold turkey?
Also can we just do the numbers a bit here, is it 1 or 2 houses she rents out? - around these parts the house she just did up would be rented for around 6 - 700 depending on the area. Plus she owns a pub with her dad. Plus what else?
 
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Back
Top