Lizzy didn’t buy either of the Prada bags, both bags were gifted to her. I honestly think Lizzy wouldn’t have bought them with her own money, she seemed to use the Cleo bag more after people on IG liked it - story of Lizzy’s life.
Lizzy has lost all her integrity and this is why advertising standards exist but are are we really surprised that Elizabeth thinks she is above conforming to them?
Under ASA guidelines if influencers accept gifted items under the terms they will show the items X amount of times, or on X platform it needs to marked as AD.
Under CMA guidelines gifted items that have been gifted with no strings attached also need to be labelled as sponsored content, so another word for AD.
Either way both those Prada bags need to be labelled as AD whenever they are featured, either in the IG caption or Youtube description ‘ad - gifted’, ‘advertisement feature’ or something similar needs to appear somewhere.
That whole Italian styling video is a declaration headache. Shouldn’t there be an AD in the title? At least AD should appear on the screen whenever she talks about the jewellery.
Similarly in that video a lot more clothing was gifted to Lizzy then disclosed. She mentions Asceno gifted her the black dress and the shorts were gifted. In reality the gifted items were; the skirt, both bikinis, both bags, both black dresses, sunglasses, the other jewellery she didn’t mention, white shorts, Church’s shoes and even the blue Arket shirt she was wearing at the end of the video.
In the description when Lizzy links to the items she needs to put AD before each one, especially the ones that are affiliate links - even if she bought those items herself.
Her IG is even more of a headache, some of her ADs have the disclosure hidden and others [the Lampoo AD] doesn’t even feature AD anywhere in the caption.
I suppose Lizzy is becoming so irrelevant no one can even be bothered to report her.
