Laurence Fox

1
What’s this?
In May this year, there was a minor Twitter spat between Narinder Kaur and Leilani Dowling(?) and LF decided to intervene by posting a photo taken years ago by paparazzi of NK's private parts (taken without her consent when she was in the back seat of a car apparently not wearing knickers). It was available on Twitter for a day or two before it was taken down. She complained to the met police and they are investigating. LF said various obnoxious things afterwards and never apologised.
 
In May this year, there was a minor Twitter spat between Narinder Kaur and Leilani Dowling(?) and LF decided to intervene by posting a photo taken years ago by paparazzi of NK's private parts (taken without her consent when she was in the back seat of a car apparently not wearing knickers). It was available on Twitter for a day or two before it was taken down. She complained to the met police and they are investigating. LF said various obnoxious things afterwards and never apologised.
Christ! Surely that comes under Revenge Porn?
 
Christ! Surely that comes under Revenge Porn?
I think it's a malicious communications offence (section 127 Communications Act 2003), because he didn't take the photo himself. It was such an obviously horrible, nasty thing to do that even his own followers had a go at him, but he more or less said "she was asking for it". His brain needs fixing. I hope the police do something about it soon - I'm not a lawyer but it must be a criminal offence to do something like that.
 
I think it's a malicious communications offence (section 127 Communications Act 2003), because he didn't take the photo himself. It was such an obviously horrible, nasty thing to do that even his own followers had a go at him, but he more or less said "she was asking for it". His brain needs fixing. I hope the police do something about it soon - I'm not a lawyer but it must be a criminal offence to do something like that.
Thanks for explaining. What an evil twit.
 
Back
Top