Krissy Cela

1
Not her posting in her broadcast channel ‘new wallpaper’ with this pic of her fiancé with a very clear tattoo of his exes name on his neck 💀
 

Attachments

  • IMG_8274.png
    IMG_8274.png
    103.7 KB · Views: 3
  • IMG_8275.png
    IMG_8275.png
    163.3 KB · Views: 5
She seems to have fallen out with a lot of people she was close to. Anyone remember Hollie? Also what happened to her merch? A friend of mine is a teacher in London and said that they’ve had some evolve you brand reps organise fitness classes for the students. Apparently they gifted them merch in random sizes. Basically just getting rid of things they couldn’t sell while trying to promote the app 😂
 
I’m not a mum and not rich so can’t fathom it but surely you’d want to try a bit more to manage when having your first baby instead of having a 24hr nanny immediately post birth then using a night nanny for sleep training a few weeks in. I guess that’s what happens when boss mumma Krissy doesn’t plan strategically to take maternity leave. Vik doesn’t strike me as the type of guy to want that for his kid either but I guess he could step up then if he cared that much about it? Does anyone know how it was when Mel had his daughter?
 
Vdayqueen24 said:
I’m not a mum and not rich so can’t fathom it but surely you’d want to try a bit more to manage when having your first baby instead of having a 24hr nanny immediately post birth then using a night nanny for sleep training a few weeks in. I guess that’s what happens when boss mumma Krissy doesn’t plan strategically to take maternity leave. Vik doesn’t strike me as the type of guy to want that for his kid either but I guess he could step up then if he cared that much about it? Does anyone know how it was when Mel had his daughter?
Click to expand...
she's a narc and here for the novelty and social currency of being a mother and "business owner", so she'd never ever have done any of the graft, and there's no shame in it, but she's doing it because she just doesn't want to do more than hold him every so often, pump his milk, and use him for content...she's already registered Arlo Nutrition on companies house so it says a lot about her desires to become a mother...it's all for clout and narc supply. Vik gets a lot out of their arrangement but I doubt he's faithful...how you get them is how you lose them and all that!
 
singleplantparent said:
she's a narc and here for the novelty and social currency of being a mother and "business owner", so she'd never ever have done any of the graft, and there's no shame in it, but she's doing it because she just doesn't want to do more than hold him every so often, pump his milk, and use him for content...she's already registered Arlo Nutrition on companies house so it says a lot about her desires to become a mother...it's all for clout and narc supply. Vik gets a lot out of their arrangement but I doubt he's faithful...how you get them is how you lose them and all that!
Click to expand...
This is just an assumption, I thought that she’d be a hands on mum based on how much she respects her own mother. She’s had a good mum so she would naturally fall into that same style….. clearly not!! That’s wild she has all that help already.
That poor baby just wants his mum and dad
 
ekm0236 said:
This is just an assumption, I thought that she’d be a hands on mum based on how much she respects her own mother. She’s had a good mum so she would naturally fall into that same style….. clearly not!! That’s wild she has all that help already.
That poor baby just wants his mum and dad
Click to expand...

Let’s be honest if most people could afford help, they would absolutely hire help. This is coming from a place of anger because you don’t have access to the same. I promise you no child is going to be negatively affected by the fact that they have a nanny doing the nappy changes and night feeds
 
qtr100 said:
Let’s be honest if most people could afford help, they would absolutely hire help. This is coming from a place of anger because you don’t have access to the same. I promise you no child is going to be negatively affected by the fact that they have a nanny doing the nappy changes and night feeds
Click to expand...

Help when going back to work sure (but I would still want my child to go to nursery for socialisation stuff) but on mat leave when I live a life of luxury already I genuinely don’t think I would. It’s such a short amount of time!

Just noticed you can see who I’m assuming is the nanny in the background when Krissy is holding Arlo post bath. Makes me think she came in for the photo op lol
 
Last edited:
qtr100 said:
Let’s be honest if most people could afford help, they would absolutely hire help. This is coming from a place of anger because you don’t have access to the same. I promise you no child is going to be negatively affected by the fact that they have a nanny doing the nappy changes and night feeds
Click to expand...
I agree, also interesting that people are very critical of those who hire a nanny but less critical of women who have help from family? Totally get people dislike her but she has money so of course she has a nanny. The idea that women have to do it all themselves and be totally worn out and exhausted when you have the money (or family support!) not to is an extension of the whole thing that you should suffer through birth with no pain relief/c section etc etc etc IMO. And I don't even want kids. Why not make it as easy as you possibly can if you have the means, whether that's a nanny or family around helping. Her body needs to recover too, she needs sleep too, I wish we would take the view that it's a shame that more women don't have access to the same instead of criticising those who can
 
qtr100 said:
Let’s be honest if most people could afford help, they would absolutely hire help. This is coming from a place of anger because you don’t have access to the same. I promise you no child is going to be negatively affected by the fact that they have a nanny doing the nappy changes and night feeds
Click to expand...
I’m not sure if you’re saying my response is coming from a negative place? Support and help whether it’s paid or unpaid is important to every family. I personally believe that the balance has to be there though, parents should have the dominant percentage of responsibility and time with their children. Otherwise, why bother if you’d rather pay someone.
---
judgejohndeed said:
I agree, also interesting that people are very critical of those who hire a nanny but less critical of women who have help from family? Totally get people dislike her but she has money so of course she has a nanny. The idea that women have to do it all themselves and be totally worn out and exhausted when you have the money (or family support!) not to is an extension of the whole thing that you should suffer through birth with no pain relief/c section etc etc etc IMO. And I don't even want kids. Why not make it as easy as you possibly can if you have the means, whether that's a nanny or family around helping. Her body needs to recover too, she needs sleep too, I wish we would take the view that it's a shame that more women don't have access to the same instead of criticising those who can
Click to expand...
Absolutely, the everyday folk totally should have the most support paid and unpaid. The more support whilst cooking, cleaning, working, paying bills, trying to maintain relationships and socialisation all whilst raising your children is essential.

However, I hardly see how Krissy would be struggling to do any of the above as her lifestyle is far different to the rest.

I would suspect she just wants to maintain the life she had before kids.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top