miserysorrow
VIP Member
Apologies I could've added more context and I'm a bit tired from working today. I know that's normal and you'd expect that realistically if you or me or anybody else had a baby but it's more the fact that she has made such a big deal coming up to the birth of her daughter and not to show her face which is probably something she saw on tiktok and just stuck with it? My thoughts were that if she was so concerned about privacy then maybe she wouldn't be oversharing as much as she is, it's not the case at all that she's not allowing people to see it because she does bring it out as seen on videos it's just that I don't get her approach whatsoever when it comes to the baby's privacySorry but I don’t understand what you mean at all? A little birdy told you Jason’s work colleagues met the baby? That’s totally normal. When she says privacy at all costs she doesn’t mean nobody is allowed look at the baby, she means she doesn’t post her face/name/loads of details online. Plenty of parents do this but they don’t hide the baby at home, they still meet local people in their day to day life. They just don’t have their pictures up on the internet.
(my 2 cents: Not sure why she has to keep the name a secret but is constantly filming her to curate views for youtube videos also she has accidentally shown the babys face before on videos and even a faceswap filter with eimear and her daughters face as seen on the last thread)
---
Keelins daughter getting the Streisand effect the minute she was bornI've seen the baby. When they were in Galway a while back I saw them, I recognised that dopey-looking fella of hers first. Realistically they have to live and people are going to recognise and see them but that is different than having the babies face all over the internet. I agree with that one. who commented on her video though, hiding names and faces doesn't mean that you are protecting the childs privacy though, they still have an internet presence even if it is a faceless one.