Katie snooks #5 Cheese, meat, booze and cake! Back to A&E with a tummy ache

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
1
Tom_Nook said:
her last tattoo video with Andrew in it is still on her channel, weirdly.
Click to expand...

I rewatched that video and here comes my possibly unpopular opinion….
I loved this era of Katie. I loved how she looked, I loved her cuteness, and I loved the chemistry with Andrew.
I know she put on the damsel in distress stuff whenever he was in the vids but I found it endearing, whereas when she does the same act with G I find it creepy.
 
Colorofleaves said:
I rewatched that video and here comes my possibly unpopular opinion….
I loved this era of Katie. I loved how she looked, I loved her cuteness, and I loved the chemistry with Andrew.
I know she put on the damsel in distress stuff whenever he was in the vids but I found it endearing, whereas when she does the same act with G I find it creepy.
Click to expand...
Totally agree! This era was when I came to love her. Then I loved her through the single dating era. This era with Daddy Geoff just gives me the creeps and he has sapped any creativity she had. It’s sad really
 
Babybail93 said:
Totally agree! This era was when I came to love her. Then I loved her through the single dating era. This era with Daddy Geoff just gives me the creeps and he has sapped any creativity she had. It’s sad really
Click to expand...

I think with age certain behaviour is socially acceptable, like how the dynamic was with Andrew and her endearing mannerisms.
fast forward several years and she’s trying to replicate it with Geoffro and ofcourse it’s gna look weird n creepy. She’s 33 and he’s 40 and looks like a vicar. Ive also deduced that with time being in her job- which isn’t exactly growing exponentially, she’s become entitled and whingey, as we all know, her dedication and passion with what she put out was clear in her content. Unlike now.
 
Whenever I shop online, if I see an item of clothing which is not being shown on a model from the front, but rather from the side, the model is posing in strange, twisted manner or if the model is covering up the waist area so you can't see how the garment is sitting, I don't buy because I can't imagine it'll look good. If the retailer has nothing to hide, they will show you a full frontal picture, so to say.
That's why I'd never buy these pants, you just can't possibly guess how they'll sit around the waist and hip area.
Plus of course Katie is way shorter than the model.
Screenshot_20210825-215616.png

Screenshot_20210825-215609.png
Screenshot_20210825-215625.png

Screenshot_20210825-215633.png
 
martaS said:
Whenever I shop online, if I see an item of clothing which is not being shown on a model from the front, but rather from the side, or if the model is covering up the waist area so you can't see how the garment is sitting, I don't buy because I can't imagine it'll look good. If the retailer has nothing to hide, they will show you a full frontal picture, so to say.
That's why I'd never buy these pants, you just can't possibly guess how they'll sit around the waist and hip area.
Plus of course Katie is way shorter than the model.
View attachment 730069 q
View attachment 730074 qView attachment 730077 q
View attachment 730078 q
Click to expand...
That’s very true - you can’t even tell in the ASOS photo that they’re pleated.
She’s so dumb. Order from the petites range, or find a good dressmaker and get them altered.
 
Are these vlogs getting more boring or is it me? When someone starts showing you inside their washing machine you've got to wonder. Either way, most of it has been shown on Instagram already.

'If you guys wear mules*, let me know what you would wear them with'.
It's a bit late for that, she's bought them. Unpacking used shoes and clothes onto the kitchen worktop gave me the ick.

*does anyone wear mules?
 
martaS said:
Whenever I shop online, if I see an item of clothing which is not being shown on a model from the front, but rather from the side, the model is posing in strange, twisted manner or if the model is covering up the waist area so you can't see how the garment is sitting, I don't buy because I can't imagine it'll look good. If the retailer has nothing to hide, they will show you a full frontal picture, so to say.
That's why I'd never buy these pants, you just can't possibly guess how they'll sit around the waist and hip area.
Plus of course Katie is way shorter than the model.
View attachment 730069 q
View attachment 730074 qView attachment 730077 q
View attachment 730078 q
Click to expand...

Let’s not ignore ‘trousers to through on’ 🤦🏼‍♀️
 
So the second trousers looks nice on her. Coming from a 5ft1 girl, it is not easy buying pants. My go-to was topshop because they have a petite range or Pull & Bear is quite shortie friendly. Did she expect to look exactly like the model when she is 25cm shorter?
 
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Back
Top