Katie Price #373 Easter lunch the ex's have united, while Katie’s out getting intoxicated!

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
1
Let's not forget she dumped Bunny with a load of strangers for hours getting her hair braided in Thailand ... anything could have happened... if something does, God forbid, she will just cash in on it, she doesnt give a toss about the well being and safety of her kids. She doesn't give a tit when they are inside her ... she is still shagging around, boozing and doing ❄
Especially as skank constantly goes on about the abuse she's suffered from a young age yet puts her youngest daughter in similar positions, randomly left in foreign salons, or with men who she's known for 5 mins..no safeguarding .like you say its like she wants harn to come to her to use for media pity press attention just like she fed off the kh cheating for years and years now its the revised versions of abuse with added extras depending whose she's talk to on these podcasts
 
Catching up with skanks baby dreams it seems every bloke after PA she was dangling babies to the new blokes within a week either naturally, ivf or going aDoption

The only one who gave her kids was kh and now he's suffering with her vile nasty parenting





https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.12...rate-bid-conceive-baby-husband-Alex-Reid.html

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.12...ands-revealing-IVF-treatment-SIXTH-child.html

Even then she was calling the shots during the divorce process with pa putting up barriers to him on seeing j&p..just like she did with DY over Harvey 😒

so in the packed Lunch interview/fiasco. Carl said that AFP knows KP’s cycle and rings them up to say she’s ovulating and have you done the deed!!!!! As bleeping if 🤣🤣
 
Especially as skank constantly goes on about the abuse she's suffered from a young age yet puts her youngest daughter in similar positions, randomly left in foreign salons, or with men who she's known for 5 mins..no safeguarding .like you say its like she wants harn to come to her to use for media pity press attention just like she fed off the kh cheating for years and years now its the revised versions of abuse with added extras depending whose she's talk to on these podcasts
I don't necessarily think that she WANTS harm to come to the kids, she just doesn't really care if it does
 
The Skinny Foods story has made the front page of the BBC, means a lot more people are aware she’s a total grifter. The two twatty chancers won’t be putting this story in their 💩 podcast this week will they. Hey Braindead fans she’s ripping you off, but bet you all will still excuse this Skank no doubt 🤦🏽‍♀️

She doesn’t give a 💩 about you, get it into your thick heads, she just wants your coin.

IMG_9294.jpeg
IMG_9295.jpeg
 
The Skinny Foods story has made the front page of the BBC, means a lot more people are aware she’s a total grifter. The two twatty chancers won’t be putting this story in their 💩 podcast this week will they. Hey Braindead fans she’s ripping you off, but bet you all will still excuse this Skank no doubt 🤦🏽‍♀️

She doesn’t give a 💩 about you, get it into your thick heads, she just wants your coin.

View attachment 2852859 qView attachment 2852860 q
Not the kind of public attention that skinny foods want to get...being called out etc
 
Michelle didn’t mention Jett in her post today but on the last thread someone posted Kieran said on TikTok he does see them both. I wonder if the three hearts mean the three boys & she’s just not naming/not allowed to name Jett on social media? View attachment 2852309 q

I wouldn't read that much into it, she didn't name Valentino or Kieran either, she probably didn't have room. I've said it before, so sorry for being a beige bore but I seriously doubt the courts can ban people from putting up regular photos of their kids on SM or mentioning them. It would have to be some very serious child protection stuff / abuse for someone to be banned from mentioning a child or putting photos up.
It could be that Jett has said he doesn't want mentioning, a bit like Valentino doesn't want to be in their posts.
 
I completed my annual Safeguarding training last week. I found myself mentally putting J&B into the case-studies referred to. On the one hand, it appears that there are much, much worse scenarios than theirs where the children are not deemed at risk enough for removal - for instance, they ARE fed (despite what we suspect about Christmas Day) and clothed and live in a warm house. Low bar, I would say, but still.
However, one thing that stood out for me backs up what another poster said up-thread. ANYONE can report suspicions of neglect or danger about children to the authorities. If @WillowTree21 has reasonable evidence, then it's got to be worth a shot? At the very least it might add weight to information they already have.
 
As someone who didn't leave a violent partner despite police intervention, coercive control is very real and difficult to break.

Very true. Has anyone else watched the documentary on Sheree and Richard Spencer? It might explain why people don't leave. He was with her 20 years. He was beaten badly for days at a time, with wine bottles so he was disfigured. The footage shows his 2 girls watching everything......so was he complicit? Is he responsible for his kids being abused? It started off with the occasional outburst and he always tried to smooth things over, when they had kids it got worse.

When his wife was mid abuse she would threaten to cut herself and then call the police and tell them it was him so he would never see his kids again, she coached the eldest daughter to tell people it was him, she shouted out of the window he was hitting her, so the neighbours would hear. All he could think about day to day was appearing normal on the outside so he wouldn't lose his kids.

Was he pathetic? Was he complicit? No of course he wasn't. He felt trapped. It's psychological abuse and it starts slowly and builds up until the person doesn't feel normal. It's actually chemical changes in the brain due to our natural survival responses not just being 'pathetic'. So none of us here on the outside can look in and say that person should have done this and that....people are not it a 'normal' state of mind. He did eventually tell people and he did record evidence but it took him years.
Again it seems a double standard, would anyone say a woman who was abused and had kids was complicit in abusing them?

https://www.channel5.com/show/my-wife-my-abuser-the-secret-footage

https://www.12ft.io/https://www.dai...pencer-slurs-speech-arrest-husband-abuse.html
 
I saw a bit of Kieran’s live. He said about Carl…we aren’t going to be going down the pub together or anything but he has been on the scene a long time as I used to call him to speak to the kids.

That's what I've been saying all along. As Carl was assigned the role of dogsbody chauffeur and babysitter for a time, it makes sense they would communicate.
I'm sure at times he will have told Kieran what was going on with KP and her habits and meltdowns! He would feel very hard done by being left to deal with the kids.
 
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Back
Top