Katie Price #2

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
1
ShowMeYourFeline said:
Enough with this sanctimonious nonsense.

You know exactly why all of this is relevant, but I will spell it out since you are making a show of being so open minded your brain has fallen out.

All unknown males - all - are a potential risk to children, and should be treated as such until it can be determined that they are trustworthy. The rate of non-fathers harming the children of their female partners is astronomical. It is common for predatory men to target single mothers with the intention of harming their children.

KP has been with him for three weeks so he is still very, very much an unknown quantity.

The fact that he is gay is relevant because it calls into question his motives behind having relationship with a woman. It could be entirely innocent, such as that it’s a mutually beneficial arrangement for them both: he gets attention, possible free housing, and more views on his channel; she gets an ego-boost, column inches, possible sub-letting money. But it could also be sinister, as he now has unfettered access to a vulnerable young male who is utterly incapable of speaking up for himself. The former scenario is obviously far more likely, but the latter can’t be discounted, because Al is unknown. And the fact that his orientation is to males makes a sinister motivation somewhat more likely than if he were straight in this particular case (the opposite would be true if Harvey were a girl).

On to the porn: this is a smallish flat making privacy difficult. Harvey is known to have gone rampaging through the mansion, so how will he behave in a confined flat during lockdown?

Porn involves continuous re-takes until the scene looks good, therefore the sex goes on for far longer. Al sometimes films scenes with other men, raising questions about which other unknown sleazy men will be allowed into the flat.

(Additionally, the fact his scenes often involve anal raises concerns about biohazards).

Finally, there is nothing wrong with having concerns with the morals and judgement of those who make porn. Not everyone agrees with porn, and you are the one being judgemental towards those with a differing worldview to yourself.

We’re not talking about acquaintances, we’re talking about Harvey living with this man in 24 hour lockdown after knowing him for 3 weeks.

I hope this answers your questions and you stop throwing around accusations of isms and phobias.



My guess is a combination of sympathy-fishing and ineptness. If she is now living in a different county, she may not know where to start with getting him re-assessed for help under a different local authority. Every county is different and has different processes, all of them hard to understand.
Click to expand...
Exactly, moving a man in youve known as 3 weeks is risky to your kids, end off. Especially those that are more vulnerable than most.
 
ShowMeYourFeline said:
Enough with this sanctimonious nonsense.

You know exactly why all of this is relevant, but I will spell it out since you are making a show of being so open minded your brain has fallen out.

All unknown males - all - are a potential risk to children, and should be treated as such until it can be determined that they are trustworthy. The rate of non-fathers harming the children of their female partners is astronomical. It is common for predatory men to target single mothers with the intention of harming their children.

KP has been with him for three weeks so he is still very, very much an unknown quantity.

The fact that he is gay is relevant because it calls into question his motives behind having relationship with a woman. It could be entirely innocent, such as that it’s a mutually beneficial arrangement for them both: he gets attention, possible free housing, and more views on his channel; she gets an ego-boost, column inches, possible sub-letting money. But it could also be sinister, as he now has unfettered access to a vulnerable young male who is utterly incapable of speaking up for himself. The former scenario is obviously far more likely, but the latter can’t be discounted, because Al is unknown. And the fact that his orientation is to males makes a sinister motivation somewhat more likely than if he were straight in this particular case (the opposite would be true if Harvey were a girl).

On to the porn: this is a smallish flat making privacy difficult. Harvey is known to have gone rampaging through the mansion, so how will he behave in a confined flat during lockdown?

Porn involves continuous re-takes until the scene looks good, therefore the sex goes on for far longer. Al sometimes films scenes with other men, raising questions about which other unknown sleazy men will be allowed into the flat.

(Additionally, the fact his scenes often involve anal raises concerns about biohazards).

Finally, there is nothing wrong with having concerns with the morals and judgement of those who make porn. Not everyone agrees with porn, and you are the one being judgemental towards those with a differing worldview to yourself.

We’re not talking about acquaintances, we’re talking about Harvey living with this man in 24 hour lockdown after knowing him for 3 weeks.

I hope this answers your questions and you stop throwing around accusations of isms and phobias.



My guess is a combination of sympathy-fishing and ineptness. If she is now living in a different county, she may not know where to start with getting him re-assessed for help under a different local authority. Every county is different and has different processes, all of them hard to understand.
Click to expand...
What an excellent post. So refreshing to see someone slap down ridiculous woke implications of 'isms and phobias' and right-on defending of what is a very dodgy situation for a vulnerable child to be exposed to.
 
Youtubegossip said:
I don’t really understand why it’s a safeguarding issue if he’s in a room away from Harvey and Katie is keeping him occupied?
I’m sure Katie has sex whilst Harvey is in the house, what’s the difference??


It’s not indefensible ... he’s not filming Harvey ffs


You’ve just got a vendetta against KP and nothing she said or did you’d agree with though? And that’s fine if that’s your opinion. Doesn’t make it correct though


Also. Harvey isn’t a child he’s 17 or 18 isn’t he. I know he has problems and mentally isn’t an adult but your talking as if he’s a baby. He was probably in the house when Katie’s filmed sex tapes herself
Click to expand...
Oh well, that's alright then! 😮
 
Whenever I ask myself “who is Katie Price’s audience” and who is buying her “merch” and tickets to her “events”? All I need to do is look over the people on Tattle who try to support and justify her actions and think ”bingo”.

I don’t think it’s humanly possible to make Feline’s post any simpler and I don’t think that those who support Jordan / The Pricey, will ever be convinced that criticism of her doesn’t come from a place of censorship or infringing civil liberties.

I cynically wonder if this apparent downwards trajectory is just the simple run up to her next “reinvention” story arc. She has been doing the cycle successfully since the nineties. And dammit, whether we are for or against her, we all fall for her drama every bloody time.
 
thatstupidcat said:
Whenever I ask myself “who is Katie Price’s audience” and who is buying her “merch” and tickets to her “events”? All I need to do is look over the people on Tattle who try to support and justify her actions and think ”bingo”.

I don’t think it’s humanly possible to make Feline’s post any simpler and I don’t think that those who support Jordan / The Pricey, will ever be convinced that criticism of her doesn’t come from a place of censorship or infringing civil liberties.

I cynically wonder if this apparent downwards trajectory is just the simple run up to her next “reinvention” story arc. She has been doing the cycle successfully since the nineties. And dammit, whether we are for or against her, we all fall for her drama every bloody time.
Click to expand...
When I see those supportive posts I always visualise the poster furiously typing "calm down" while red faced with frustration that anyone could criticise their idol or any of her dubious choices regarding her children.Obviously manky old images of katie with her tits out will adorn their walls and their chilldren will be cally Fluffy-wuffy, Pinkie-pet,Lady-lovely or some such name.

I watched her flounce from celeb SAS last night. Yes I know, flouncing and SAS are words rarely used together, but katie managed it when she slammed down her sand bag and ripped off her arm band in fury at being told to "Lift the effing bag over yer head!" Her anger at those blokes was palpable, and hilarious.😂 Don't they know who she is ? Yes, a quitter who thought her page 3 rep would get her a free pass. Next!
 
Does anyone else think Katie looks pregnant in the Tesco pics? Pic #9 especially. But then again, if she is pregnant she probably wont know about it until she is atleast 6 months gone...
 
BumbleB said:
Does anyone else think Katie looks pregnant in the Tesco pics? Pic #9 especially. But then again, if she is pregnant she probably wont know about it until she is atleast 6 months gone...
Click to expand...
No not really. She does have a belly but always photo shops it away for piics.
Who is gonna tell her that there is no point in wearing gloves and then touching your face and flicking your hair with them still on.
 
Foxybrown said:
Does anyone know what happened about her brother looking after her money? I remember in one of her reality shows she mentioned how so many 'celebs' spending was outta control & they go bankrupt & she doesn't want to be one of them, so that's why she let her brother be her financial manager, he's not even featured in her 'Crazy Life show', probably cos her house smells of tit !
Click to expand...

I read somewhere that when her brother renovated his house, she pitched a fit and accused him of stealing money from her. She‘s an absolute psychopath so the fact she would have the nerve to say those things to one of the few people in her life who tried to help her, manage her and dig her out of the mess she made of her career, comes as no surprise. He put up with her crap for far too long IMO.

What I would like to know is what happened to Gary and Phil? I have a theory as they seemed to bail on her after the court case against CAN heated up. Those two know where ALL her bones are buried. They arranged for her to have sex with that Andre Pinto guy from Ibiza only 3 weeks after Pete left...in their own house! Gary also returned to Britain with her over Mother’s Day when she was filming in the States with Pete. I speculate that they took her to have that poor unborn child aborted because she had no idea who the father was. There was a scene in ’Stateside’ when Pete picks them up at the LAX airport and Katie and Gary gave each other a look in the car...thick as thieves.

I wonder if Gary and Phil were called to testify during the CAN case? Lying to Pete and Claire is one thing...but lying under oath and being dragged into potential perjury, that’s another. And then **poof** they disappeared.
 
maytoseptember said:
Tell me more about the court case, or does no one really know much about it? I remember Popbitch mentioning it from time to time. What was it actually about?
Click to expand...

In a nutshell: Katie accused CAN (Claire’s management/PR firm) and Peter of running a hate campaign against her after her and Pete split and misuse of confidential personal information. So, as usual, she was looking to blame others for her terrible business sense and life choices. Neville and Claire broke up (Neville also ran CAN) which split the firm. He ended up going to Katie and talking a load of crap to her in a bid to get revenge on Claire. In the end, they settled and Katie agreed to pay a substantial amount of court costs to Claire and Peter. Ive also read that her own legal fees were in excess of £2 million. The case broke her. It was a terrible mistake.
 
So what is the current situ with Katie? She no longer lives in the mucky mansion, is it still being renovated or did she sell it and buy something else? Also she no longer has any of her kids full time at home? Younger ones with their dads and Harvey in supported accommodation, But currently isolating with mum. So did the kids just prefer to lives with their dads or did she loose custody?
 
Bonnie Bisou said:
So what is the current situ with Katie? She no longer lives in the mucky mansion, is it still being renovated or did she sell it and buy something else? Also she no longer has any of her kids full time at home? Younger ones with their dads and Harvey in supported accommodation, But currently isolating with mum. So did the kids just prefer to lives with their dads or did she loose custody?
Click to expand...

It's hard to say what the actual arrangement is because child custody and family court matters are private/sealed but if Pete has the power to forbid the kids from appearing on Katie's shows, as well as order her to take drugs tests before she could see them, that implies he has full parental rights over the kids. Plus he registered them in new schools near his home. Not sure about Kieren. Doesn't really seem to matter these days though. Her kids are more of a burden to her anyways. She'd rather shag strangers, snort coke and get pissed.

And just to quickly introduce myself...i know it seems i've come out of know where. I've been reading about Katie and Pete for years and commenting slightly. I used to read Digital Spy and the 3am site. Does anyone remember that? It was CRAZY in those days. Katie and her minions would comment under fake names and say awful things about Pete's family, calling his parents ******* etc. It was really bad back then!
 
Cacacoisfarraige said:
She seems hardly to bother with the youngest two children. I remember noticing the difference between the presents for the older kids and the cheap tat (packs of markers) for the younger ones.
Click to expand...
I recall her giving them both quad bikes around Christmas time and being disgusted. They are just 5 and 7 and far too young for something like that, safety gear or not. At that age their judgement is not good regarding what is safe to do. They don't live on her mucky mansion land any more, where using a quad might have been ok under supervision. Not sure when they get to use them or even if they have anywhere to store them, especially since corona lockdown, but hey, she got pictures of herself giving them to them so that's the main thing innit.
 
I've always been intrigued by the situation with Kieran. Did he really cheat on her? Watching the last series of her reality show, there were a few interactions between them and it came across through his resentful digs at her, that at one point he genuinely cared for her, but simply became fed up of her behaviour and left. He didn't come across like the sneaky, cheating type. If it was a lie, I would wonder why he went along with it?

If she's lost custody of all 4 kids, there must be some compelling evidence about what she is really up to behind the scenes. Either that, or she just couldn't be bothered and gave up on them.

It seems pointless trying to revamp her image now. She looks a wreck, still has those enormous 90s bimbo breasts. And the years of her shennanigans have left her on dustbin level. Her "career" is over. It'll be a sad state of affairs once she is fully able to register that.
 
Hunnaybadgerz said:
Katie’s money woes come from the court case with CAN and PA. She lost a huge amount of money. Hundreds of thousands.
Click to expand...

Hundreds of thousands is a lot but for someone who claimed to be worth millions? Has the amount she had to pay ever been disclosed?

freda19 said:
Correct.
Plus, according to my ex workmate(who once was a huge Katie fan) she was offered the chance several times for them to withdraw the case if she made a public apology, but she refused because she was so sure she'd win. That's why it ran on for literally years. She lost and had to make the apology as well as forking out the compo and paying costs for both sides. Because she'd been so stubborn her legal costs went through the roof and it's alleged that payment to that legal team is part of the bills that caused her recent bankruptcy.
Click to expand...

imagine this women was at one point meant to be worth 42. million. You have to wonder did she put that out herself. Also if it was the court case imagine being so pig headed to keep it going for so long? Plus she hardly learnt from it when she was spouting off about Alex Reid on telly.
 
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Back
Top