Katie Price #2

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
1
ShowMeYourFeline said:
Does anyone else think that “Harvey’s Law” sounds horrifically totalitarian? The idea that “online abuse”, ie rude comments online, can be criminalised to the point of putting people on a national register?

Depending on what the government decide is “abuse”, this can and will be used to force people to conform to certain political opinions. It will also be used to silence criticism of public figures and politicians.

Just so sad weaklings don’t get called mean names, that they would never even see if they didn’t set out to look for it.

Katie claiming it’s driven her to suicide, drug abuse and rehab is manipulative nonsense. It’s part of fame, especially her type of fame. If she has mental breakdowns at the sight of anonymous rude words, then the problem is with her. This kind of manipulation should never be used as the basis for laws.
Click to expand...
Here’s the thing there’s one thing having an opinion and getting called a troll for telling an influencer purple is purple when they think it’s green like we do and there’s another saying completely vile things about an innocent person.

Not sticking up for Kate as I think she can be a bully and nasty piece of work but even recently I saw “Harvey” trending on twitter and the things I read were quite frankly shameful from thousands of grown men.
 
What I explained is exactly why you can’t criminalise speech.

Everyone agrees that it’s appalling to be insulting a defenceless disabled boy. (Even those making jokes know morally they shouldn’t be doing it) The unfairness evokes strong a strong emotional need for justice which is why people say something must be done.

But because the definition of “abuse” is subjective and cannot clearly be defined, it must be defined widely and vaguely. Like all similar anti-speech laws, it will be used to control speech and politics. It is impossible to create a law against online “abuse” that doesn’t exclude “abuse” (ie criticism) of politicians and other influential people, or opposition to recent moral standards (gender, race politics etc) as “abuse”.

Many members of certain movements think that it is abuse, hate and violence to disagree with them on any matter, and the law agrees with them. For example, even the most mild disagreement with transgender ideology can and has got people fired. The recent slogan “white silence is violence” defines white people not fully cheering on black lives matter as violent. I use these examples to show how “abuse” can be defined and used to further political movements.

It’s sad that people insult Harvey, but it’s not worth throwing away free speech for. These comments don’t hurt him, and shouldn’t hurt Katie; and if it does, it’s her own problem to deal with.
 
Crazycatlady18 said:
Thought she was going to keep relationships out of the public eye? Lasted long.
Click to expand...
Another of her lies, I recall her claiming to get sober.

www.mirror.co.uk

Katie Price gifts Princess choc bars called 'f**ker' & 'oral' for 13th birthday

Katie Price's daughter Princess, 13, shared a picture of a pile of chocolate bars with inappropriate names that her mum got her for her birthday
www.mirror.co.uk www.mirror.co.uk

Classy as ever, Pete must be bleeping furious.

https://www.12ft.io/https://www.dai...s-13-officially-launches-YouTube-channel.html

Oh dear!
 
Last edited:
This photo is too freaky.
As for ‘watch this space’... August wedding? 😂
 

Attachments

  • D84DC607-DB88-4ECB-9538-B65760718D4E.png
    D84DC607-DB88-4ECB-9538-B65760718D4E.png
    102.6 KB · Views: 153
You can’t criminalise people for slinging insults online 😂 yes it’s tit but it’s never going to be an arrestable offence for calling someone (even a kid) a bleep on the internet. I agree with the likes of Hopkins being booted off twitter but that’s completely different. Plus she chose to plaster poor Harvey all over the internet, it was never his choice.
 
QuirkyFlamingo said:
And then she comes back with “That’s why we know what we know and know we are forever”...
I can hear the wedding bells from here...
Click to expand...
I can hear people saying "Oh no NOT AGAIN!"

Weescottishmaw said:
Or baby news???
Click to expand...
hope not.

Oh MY!! Breaking news.

www.mirror.co.uk

Katie Price 'is gutted as £2m mucky mansion is completely flooded in break-in'

Katie Price reportedly recoiled in horror when she discovered her £2million family home was destroyed in a break-in
www.mirror.co.uk www.mirror.co.uk
 
Last edited:
Dog tit filled and cat pissed in mucky mansion flooded... Hey swanky katie... Think of it as a freebie washout.. Assume you 'll claim on the skank mansion house / buildings insurance!! How'd the eff can a bankrupt go on holidays kids shopping trips , buy designer clothes. Thought all credit cards not allowed by the bankcruptcy legal team banned them and gave a weekly cash allowance... Any extra earned money e.g. Ads, social media PA appearances ( earn usually at least a grand) was split between creditors owed by the bankcruptcy legal team????
 
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Back
Top