Juice Plus Past & Present #11 Carpentry, porn & hair extensions how else will skint huns pay for JP conventions

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
1
Harriet's triggered by someone asking a reasonable question about Weshop.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20231206_135023_Samsung Internet.jpg
    Screenshot_20231206_135023_Samsung Internet.jpg
    72.1 KB · Views: 68
  • Screenshot_20231206_135127_Samsung Internet.jpg
    Screenshot_20231206_135127_Samsung Internet.jpg
    70.2 KB · Views: 69
  • Screenshot_20231206_135100_Samsung Internet.jpg
    Screenshot_20231206_135100_Samsung Internet.jpg
    69.3 KB · Views: 87
The only person she knows that has "cashed out" is one of the owners. They keep posting screenshots from this guy.
And also, why is she so offended that someone asked her to "prove" what she's saying? She's been banging on about weshop for months and trying to persuade people to join promising a load of money back, yet seems annoyed when someone asks her to prove that it actually works. Harriet is going to look such a tit when this crashes down around her.
 
So i looked into the vote for we shop. It wasnt an ‘equal’ or fair vote. So it wasnt 1 vote per person, it was 1 vote per share. So olivia who has lots of ‘shares’ she gets multiple votes. But somehow i dont believe that she would vote to not take out her shares as she has around £46k in balance.

unless the owners have bribed her and h into voting against 🧐
 
So i looked into the vote for we shop. It wasnt an ‘equal’ or fair vote. So it wasnt 1 vote per person, it was 1 vote per share. So olivia who has lots of ‘shares’ she gets multiple votes. But somehow i dont believe that she would vote to not take out her shares as she has around £46k in balance.

unless the owners have bribed her and h into voting against 🧐
In theory any sort of “community” vote they’ve had is actually pretty meaningless regardless of how many votes people may have. Because there hasn’t been a public share offer the likes of Olivia and Harriet actually have no say in how the company is run, that’s all down to the directors. Of course the directors might be very genuine and be listening to all of the people who think they have a say in this company, but then again they could be doing surveys as a bit of a PR stunt and then just ploughing on however they want to regardless.

Harriet can’t explain how things are being run because she has no more idea than anyone else. She just hedging her bets in pushing it and hoping it pays off.
 
Not sure why it popped into my head, but just been thinking back to the time big H said her an Dan liked to travel a lot, so it made sense for them to put their house on air bnb. Hahahahahaha that went well didn't it. An the time they went to Spain for half an hour in February an tried to make out they were there for a month 🤣 good times.
 
Not sure why it popped into my head, but just been thinking back to the time big H said her an Dan liked to travel a lot, so it made sense for them to put their house on air bnb. Hahahahahaha that went well didn't it. An the time they went to Spain for half an hour in February an tried to make out they were there for a month 🤣 good times.
They're such tools those two. I also don't recall this overpriced nonsense happening in November either. Probably abandoned the idea because nobody was interested. I think they've also abandoned their little partnership - probably a good thing for Rachael - it appears she's doing some gift swap thing for Christmas - just hope greedy old big H doesn't try to get involved and monetise it as it's actually a very sweet idea.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20231206_231359_Samsung Internet.jpg
    Screenshot_20231206_231359_Samsung Internet.jpg
    34.3 KB · Views: 56
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Back
Top