Johnny Depp and Amber Heard #23

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
1
They just mentioned Amber slipping up & admitting why she wrote the Op-Ed. Calling her disingenuous. I just hope the jury remembers?
It's a pity Camille didn't bring that up in closing, along with the texts he didn't write & how we never once heard on tape her mention to him about any physical violence to her unlike JD talking about her hitting/punching him & throwing pots, pans & vases at him.
In Oz she also spat at him. Disgusting cow. But then her leaving a turd on his side of the bed speaks volumes about her mindset. :sick:
 
LadyLockdown said:
There is absolutely no doubt in my mind that Rupert Murdoch is one of the most dangerous men since Hitler. He holds so much power it is insane.
Click to expand...

I agree completely. People haven't a clue how powerful he is.

@Mags44 Whether it's right or not, I'm glad this trial was televised in its entirety if only to point out the glaring differences between what actually happens in court and what media are reporting about what happens in court. It may help people to think a little more independently when future cases come up.
 
Dotty Merton said:
Geoffrey founder of said legal chambers speaks of dating Nigella Lawson to get his QC back in the day (his autobiography is boakkk about women) and then moved onto comedian Kathy Lette who would lick anyones arse for press and held a party for 'Ambers Angels' which inc aussies Kylie and Cate B. hence a) why I wonder what they think about the case now and b) I think he did it for press.
Click to expand...
I'm taking anything with a pinch of salt that can't even fact check enough to get someone's profession correct. Kathy Lette is an author
 
I know the trial is set in Virginia in Fairfax as that is where the Washington Post is based so obviously its there. I have been there and its a truly beautiful place and the people are very welcoming.however I wouldn't want a case of this nature to be based there.
Muchosgracias said:
I agree completely. People haven't a clue how powerful he is.

@Mags44 Whether it's right or not, I'm glad this trial was televised in its entirety if only to point out the glaring differences between what actually happens in court and what media are reporting about what happens in court. It may help people to think a little more independently when future cases come up.
Click to expand...
Yes I accept that point of view correctly and respectfully.
 
Imhereapparently28 said:
What does that mean and why is that so significant?
Click to expand...

If they’re asking questions it gives an insight into their thought processes and shows they want more clarification on a certain subject. Apparently a jury on a murder case once asked if they could have a police escort out of the court - that kind of question just shows what their verdict will be 😂
I’m taking it as meaning they pretty much know what they’re doing and don’t need to ask anything for clarification… could mean they’re pretty certain of what they think and what they’re doing. I could be wrong tho!
 
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Back
Top