......
I'm happy to call them out when in my opinion its warranted and voice my opinion but not just criticise for sake of it.
Do appreciate that this isn't a gushing site and people are hear to voice their opinions on what they feel is wrong but reading some of comments have to wonder why some people bother to waste time following them .eg somebody had a whole rant that in recreation dances Joe was to close to her when he jumped over her and there could've been a serious accident! Come on shouldn't the debate been about him releasing these at the same time strictly starts?
Debate and opinion or hate please let me know.
I hope it might clarify matters a little to briefly analyse how these threads have evolved:
The first strand would be the views about influencing, which breaks down into
- Joe (Pros and Cons);
- Dianne (Pros and Cons);
- JOANNE (Pros and Cons)
The second strand inevitably consists of matters outside influencing, and includes anything from family to showbiz to cars, to holidays etc and breaks down into
- Joe (Pros and Cons)
- Dianne (Pros and Cons)
- JOANNE (Pros and Cons)
I have used the noun
strand deliberately, because these categories weave into each other ineluctably, and there are many permutations, which is one reason why these threads are, I think, interesting and keep going.
e.g. Eucalyptus in post #909 summed up a lot of frustration here, and you have yourself appeared to articulate exasperation with Joe. Many here have apparently unsubscribed from them both, I unsubscribed from the Sugg side a couple of months ago. I am not interested in his take on gaming, and this particular vid is what finally did it for me:
I do occasionally watch his vids if there are referred to here. Like many other posters here, I am interested in the dark art of influencing and the (mis)behaviour of influencers.
As MeganSnarkle stated, the JOANNE relationship is on public display and has prompted a range of observations from those who think it is a PR fix, to those who query how it works and if it works.
You queried the comments about Sugg in the dance studio, when he executed a potentially dangerous manoeuvre. That was simply an extension of observations about Joe's selfish behaviour and continuing lack of high level skill at dance routines.
I do not believe such observations are 'hate': they are expressions of cynicism engendered by exasperation. This was never a fan thread,- that exists in
Rave About: We have never suggested other sugar sweet fan sites should closed, albeit middle aged stans who fawn over JOANNE on such inane sites might not act with the same generosity of spirit towards Tattle. For instance, you cannot be critical on a site like this one. viz
in posts '#8563 & #8570. (Perish the thought that an influencer would ever try to breach the ad regs) History does not record if Andy lived to tell the tale.